Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research indicates that balanced news coverage of opposing scientific claims can result in heightened uncertainty among audiences about what is true. In this study, we test the ability of a weight-of-experts statement to enhance individuals’ ability to distinguish between more versus less valid claims. An experiment found that the weight-of-experts narrative led participants to greater certainty about what scientists judged to be true, which made participants more likely to “buy in” to that judgment themselves.

Keywords

weight of evidence weight of experts controversial science balance uncertainty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abelson

R. P.

Prentice

D. A.

(1997). Contrast tests of interaction hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 2, 315-328. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.2.4.315

Berinsky

A. J.

Huber

G. A.

Lenz

G. S.

(2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057

Binder

A. R.

Hillback

E. D.

Brossard

(2015). Conflict or caveats? Effects of media portrayals of scientific uncertainty on audience perceptions of new technologies. Risk Analysis, 36, 831-846. doi:10.1111/risa.12462

Brechman

Lee

C. J.

Cappella

J. N.

(2009). Lost in translation? A comparison of cancer-genetics reporting in the press release and its subsequent coverage in the press. Science Communication, 30, 453-474.

Brossard

Nisbet

M. C.

(2007). Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding US opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 24-52.

Buhrmester

Kwang

Gosling

S. D.

(2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980

Cacciatore

M. A.

Scheufele

D. A.

Iyengar

(2016). The end of framing as we know it . . . and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 7-23.

Chaiken

Duckworth

K. L.

Darke

(1999). When parsimony fails . . . Psychological Inquiry, 10, 118-123.

Chen

Chaiken

(1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In Chaiken

Trope

(Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

10.

Cialdini

R. B.

(2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

11.

Clarke

C. E.

Dixon

G. N.

Holton

McKeever

B. W.

(2015). Including “evidentiary balance” in news media coverage of vaccine risk. Health Communication, 30, 461-472. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.867006

12.

Clarke

C. E.

McKeever

Holton

Dixon

G. N.

(2015). The influence of weight-of-evidence messages on (vaccine) attitudes: A sequential mediation model. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 1302-1309. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1023959

13.

Corbett

J. B.

Durfee

J. L.

(2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26, 129-151. doi:10.1177/1075547004270234

14.

Dearing

J. W.

(1995). Newspaper coverage of maverick science: Creating controversy through balancing. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 341-361.

15.

Dixon

G. N.

(2016). Applying the gateway belief model to genetically modified food perceptions: New insights and additional questions. Journal of Communication, 66, 888-908.

16.

Dixon

G. N.

Clarke

C. E.

(2013). Heightening uncertainty around certain science media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication, 35, 358-382.

17.

Dixon

G. N.

McKeever

B. W.

Holton

A. E.

Clarke

Eosco

(2015). The power of a picture: Overcoming scientific misinformation by communicating weight-of-evidence information with visual exemplars. Journal of Communication, 65, 639-659. doi:10.1111/jcom.12159

18.

Dunwoody

(1982). A question of accuracy. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-254), 196-199.

19.

Dunwoody

Griffin

R. J.

(2002). Judgmental heuristics and news reporting. In Gowda

Fox

J. C.

(Eds.), Judgments, decisions, and public policy (pp. 177-198). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Dunwoody

Konieczna

(2013). The role of global media in telling the climate change story. In Ward

S. J.

(Ed.), Global media ethics: Problems and perspectives (pp. 171-190). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

21.

Eagly

A. H.

Chaiken

(1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

22.

Fleury-Bahi

(2008). Environmental risk: Perception and target with local versus global evaluation. Psychological Reports, 102, 185-193.

23.

Freudenburg

W. R.

(2001). Risk, responsibility and recreancy. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 9, 87-108.

24.

Gifford

Scannell

Kormos

Smolova

Biel

Boncu

. . .Uzzell

(2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1-12.

25.

Gigerenzer

Selten

(2001). Rethinking rationality. In Gigerenzer

Selten

(Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 1-2). Cambridge: MIT Press.

26.

Hanigan

Thurman

E. M.

Ferrer

Zhao

Andrews

Zhang

. . .Westerhoff

(2015). Methadone contributes to N-Nitrosodimethylamine formation in surface waters and wastewaters during chloramination. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2(6), 151-157. doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00096

27.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

28.

Imai

Keele

Tingley

Yamamoto

(2010). Causal mediation analysis using R. In Vinod

H. D.

(Ed.), Advances in social science research using R (pp. 129-154). New York, NY: Springer.

29.

Jaffe

(2016, March 28). Obama calls for more facts, fewer insults in speech to journalists. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-calls-for-more-facts-fewer-insults-in-speech-to-journalists/2016/03/28/736c0b1c-f53f-11e5-a3ce-f06b5ba21f33_story.html

30.

Kahan

D. M.

(2015). What is the “Science of Science Communication”? Journal of Science Communication, 14(3), 1-12.

31.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1982). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11, 143-157.

32.

Kelman

H. C.

Hamilton

V. L.

(1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

33.

Koehler

D. J.

(2016). Can journalistic “false balance” distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22, 24-38.

34.

Kohl

P. A.

Kim

S. Y.

Peng

Akin

Koh

E. J.

Howell

Dunwoody

(2016). The influence of weight-of-evidence strategies on audience perceptions of (un)certainty when media cover contested science. Public Understanding of Science, 25, 976-991. doi:10.1177/0963662515615087

35.

Kortenkamp

K. V.

Basten

(2015). Environmental science in the media: Effects of opposing viewpoints on risk and uncertainty perceptions. Science Communication, 37, 287-313. doi:10.1177/1075547015574016

36.

Kostich

M. S.

Batt

A. L.

Lazorchak

J. M.

(2014). Concentrations of prioritized pharmaceuticals in effluents from 50 large wastewater treatment plants in the US and implications for risk estimation. Environmental Pollution, 184, 354-359.

37.

LaFrance

(2016, May 6). The golden age of reading the news. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/05/oh-internet-you-wonderful-newsy-readable-lovely-internet/481500/

38.

Levay

K. E.

Freese

Druckman

J. N.

(2016). The demographic and political composition of Mechanical Turk samples. SAGE Open, 6(1), 1-17.

39.

Lewandowsky

Ecker

U. K.

Seifert

C. M.

Schwarz

Cook

(2012). Misinformation and its correction continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106-131.

40.

Lewandowsky

Gignac

G. E.

Vaughan

(2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399-404.

41.

W. C.

(2014). Occurrence, sources, and fate of pharmaceuticals in aquatic environment and soil. Environmental Pollution, 187, 193-201.

42.

Liberman

Trope

(2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201-1205. doi:10.1126/science.1161958

43.

Manjoo

(2013, June 6). You won’t finish this article: Why people online don’t read to the end. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/06/how_people_read_online_why_you_won_t_finish_this_article.html

44.

Myers

T. A.

Maibach

Peters

Leiserowitz

(2015). Simple messages help set the record straight about scientific agreement on human-caused climate change: The results of two experiments. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0120985. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120985

45.

Nussbaum

Liberman

Trope

(2006). Predicting the near and distant future. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 152-161. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.152

46.

Simon

H. A.

(1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138.

47.

Singer

(1990). A question of accuracy: How journalists and scientists report research on hazards. Journal of Communication, 40(4), 102-116.

48.

Sweney

(2015, June 1). Time spent reading newspapers worldwide falls over 25% in four years. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jun/01/global-newspaper-readership-zenithoptimedia-media-consumption

49.

Thomm

Bromme

(2012). “It should at least seem scientific!” Textual features of “scientificness” and their impact on lay assessments of online information. Science Education, 96, 187-211.

50.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463. doi:10.1037/a0018963

51.

Trope

Liberman

Wakslak

(2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83-95.

52.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.

53.

Uzzell

D. L.

(2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 307-318. doi:10.1006/jevp.2000.0175

54.

van der Linden

S. L.

Leiserowitz

A. A.

Feinberg

G. D.

Maibach

E. W

. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0118489. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489

55.

Weinstein

N. D.

(1989). Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science, 246, 1232-1233.

Using Weight-of-Experts Messaging to Communicate Accurately About Contested Science

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References