This research note discusses the representation of scientific controversies in museums in a particular national context, Portugal. Despite the recent development of the national scientific system and the field of science museums, the connection between science and society has remained weak. The description of the content of scientific exhibitions, namely about controversial issues, shows that science is still portrayed as beyond dispute and unequivocally beneficial and the public is dismissed as irrational and in need of enlightenment. The role of museums as forums for debate and exchange of ideas is yet to be fulfilled.
Arnold, K. ( 1996) "Presenting Science as Product or as Processes: Museums and the Making of Science," in S. Pearce (ed.) Exploring Science in Museums , pp. 57-78. London: The Athlone Press.
2.
Bradburne, J. ( 1998) "Problématique d’une création: Newmetropolis," in B. Schiele and E. Koster (eds) La révolution de la muséologie des sciences, pp. 39-77. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
3.
Butler, S. ( 1992) Science and Technology Museums. Leicester : Leicester University Press.
4.
Durant, J. ( 1998a) "Introduction," in J. Durant (ed.) Museums and the Public Understanding of Science, pp. 7-11. London: Science Museum.
5.
Durant, J. ( 1998b) "A Reply to Les Levidow," EASST Review 17(2).
6.
Durant, J. ( 2004) "The Challenge and Opportunity of Presenting ‘Unfinished Science’," in D. Chittenden, G. Farmelo and B.V. Lewenstein (eds) Creating Connections: Museums and the Public Understanding of Research, pp. 47-60. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
7.
Einsiedel, A.A. and Einsiedel, E.F. ( 2004) "Museums as Agora: Diversifying Approaches to Engaging Publics in Research," in D. Chittenden, G. Farmelo and B.V. Lewenstein (eds) Creating Connections: Museums and the Public Understanding of Research, pp. 73-86. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
8.
Elam, M. and Bertilsson, M. ( 2003) "Consuming, Engaging and Confronting Science: The Emerging Dimensions of Scientific Citizenship," European Journal of Social Theory6: 233-51.
9.
European Commission (2005a) Eurobarometer 63.1: Europeans, Science and Technology. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/ public_opinion/archives/eb_special_en.htm (accessed February 2008).
10.
European Commission (2005b) Eurobarometer 64.3: Europeans and Biotechnology. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/ public_opinion/archives/eb_special_en.htm (accessed February 2008).
11.
Felt, U. (ed.) (2003) OPUS-Optimizing Public Understanding of Science and Technology: Final Report. URL: http://www.univie.ac.at/virusss/opus/OPUS%20Report%20Final.pdf (accessed February 2008).
12.
Friedman, A. ( 2000) "Museums, Communities and Contemporary Science," in S. Lindquist (ed.) Museums of Modern Science, pp. 43-51. Canton : Watson Publishing International.
13.
Gaskell, G. ( 2004) "Science Policy and Society: The British Debate over GM Agriculture," Current Opinion in Biotechnology15: 241-5.
14.
Gieryn, T.F. ( 2001) "Balancing Acts: Science, Enola Gay and History Wars at the Smithsonian," in S. Macdonald (ed.) The Politics of Display: Museums, Science, Culture, pp. 197-228. London: Routledge.
15.
Gonçalves, M.E. ( 2002) "Implementation of EIA Directives in Portugal: How Changes in Civic Culture are Challenging Political and Administrative Practice," Environmental Impact Assessment Review22: 249-69.
16.
Gonçalves, M.E. and Castro, P. ( 2003) "Science, Culture and Policy: A Triangle of Changing Relationships ," Portuguese Journal of Social Sciences1(3): 157-73.
17.
Gregory, J. and Miller, S. ( 1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility . New York: Plenum Trade.
18.
Hagendijk, R. and Irwin, A. ( 2006) "Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe," Minerva44: 167-84.
19.
Irwin, A. ( 1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
20.
Klintman, M. ( 2002) "The Genetically Modified (GM) Food Labelling Controversy: Ideologic and Epistemic Crossovers," Social Studies of Science32(1): 71-91.
21.
Lehr, J.L., McCallie, E., Davies, S., Caron, B., Gammon, B. and Duensing, S. ( 2007) "The Value of ‘Dialogue Events’ as Sites of Learning: An Exploration of Research and Evaluation Frameworks," International Journal of Science Education29(12): 1467-87.
22.
Levidow, L. ( 1998) "Domesticating Biotechnology: How London’s Science Museum has Framed Controversy," EASST Review 17(1).
23.
Macdonald, S. ( 2002) Behind the Scenes at the Science Museum. Oxford: Berg.
24.
Macdonald, S. ( 2004) "Exhibitions and the Public Understanding of Science Paradox," The Pantaneto Forum 13. URL: http://www.pantaneto.co.uk/issue13/macdonald.htm (accessed February 2008).
25.
Macdonald, S. and Silverstone, R. ( 1992) "Science on Display: The Representation of Scientific Controversy in Museum Exhibitions," Public Understanding of Science1: 69-87.
26.
Maranta, A., Guggenheim, M., Gisler, P. and Pohl, C. ( 2003) "The Reality of Experts and the Imagined Lay Person ," Acta Sociologica46(2): 150-65.
27.
Matias, M. ( 2004) "‘Don’t Treat Us Like Dirt’: The Fight against the Co-incineration of Dangerous Industrial Waste in the Outskirts of Coimbra," South European Society and Politics9(2): 132-58.
28.
Mazda, X. ( 2004) "Dangerous Ground? Public Engagement with Scientific Controversy ," in D. Chittenden, G. Farmelo and B.V. Lewenstein (eds) Creating Connections: Museums and the Public Understanding of Research, pp. 127-44. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
29.
Miller, S., Caro, P., Koulaidis, V., de Semir, V., Staveloz, W. and Vargas, R(2002) Report from the Expert Group Benchmarking the Promotion of RTD Culture and Public Understanding of Science. Brussels: European Commission. URL: ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/era/docs/bench_pus_0702.pdf (accessed February 2008).
30.
Morton, A. ( 1990) "Tomorrow’s Yesterdays: Science Museums and the Future," in R. Lumley (ed.) The Museum Time-machine, pp. 128-43. London : Routledge.
31.
Nelkin, D. ( 1995) "Science Controversies: The Dynamics of Public Disputes in the US," in S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen and T. Pinch (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 444-56. London: SAGE.
32.
Pedretti, E. ( 2002) "T. Kuhn Meets T. Rex: Critical Conversations and New Directions in Science Centres and Science Museums," Studies in Science Education37: 1-42.
33.
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. ( 1985) Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
Tercier, N.S. ( 2003) "L’Alimentarium, un musée en activités," in B. Pellegrin (ed.) Sciences au musée. Sciences nomades, pp. 107-13. Geneva: Georg Éditeur.
35.
Van Schendelen, R. ( 2003) "The GMO Food Arena in the EU (1998-2001)," Journal of Public Affairs3(3): 225-31.
36.
Ward, L. ( 1997) "Lessons of Science Box," in G. Farmelo and J. Carding (eds) Here and Now: Contemporary Science and Technology in Museums and Science Centres, pp. 83-90. London: Science Museum.
37.
Wynne, B. ( 1995) "Public Understanding of Science," in S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen and T. Pinch (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 361-88. London: SAGE.
38.
Wynne, B. ( 2002) "Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?," Current Sociology50(3): 459-77.
39.
Zolberg, V.L. ( 1998) "Contested Remembrance: The Hiroshima Exhibit Controversy ," Theory and Society27: 565-90.
