When reporting scientific information, journalists often present common myths that are refuted with scientific facts. However, correcting misinformation this way is often not only ineffective but can increase the likelihood that people misremember it as true. We test this backfire effect in the context of journalistic coverage and examine how to counteract it. In a web-based experiment, we find evidence for a systematic backfire effect that occurs after a few minutes and strengthens after five days. Results show that forming judgments immediately during reception (in contrast to memory-based) can reduce backfire effects and prevent erroneous memory from affecting participants’ attitudes.
AjzenI. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In KuhlJ.BeckmannJ. (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
2.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
AndersonN. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
ArkesH. R.BoehmL.XuG. (1991). Determinants of judged validity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 576-605. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(91)90026-3
6.
ArkesH. R.HackettC.BoehmL. (1989). The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2(2), 81-94. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960020203
7.
BaconF. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241-252. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241
8.
BeggI.AnasA.FarinacciS. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446
9.
BeggI.ArmourV.KerrT. (1985). On believing what we remember. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 17, 199-214. doi:10.1037/h0080140
10.
BizerG. Y.TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D.PettyR. E. (2006). Memory-based versus on-line processing: Implications for attitude strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 646-653. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.002
11.
BoehmL. E. (1994). The validity effect: A search for mediating variables. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 285-293. doi:10.1177/0146167294203006
12.
BornsteinR. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
13.
ChaikenS. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.572
14.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
DechêneA.StahlC.HansenJ.WänkeM. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238-257. doi:10.1177/1088868309352251
EvansJ. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
18.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In AllbaracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173-222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
GigerenzerG. (1984). External validity of laboratory experiments: The frequency-validity relationship. American Journal of Psychology, 97, 185-195. doi:10.2307/1422594
20.
HamiltonD. L.ShermanS. J.MaddoxK. B. (1999). Dualities and continua: Implications for understanding perceptions of persons and groups. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 606-629). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
HargreavesI.LewisJ.SpeersT. (2003). Towards a better map: Science, the public and the media. London, England: Economic and Social Research Council.
22.
HasherL.GoldsteinD.ToppinoT. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1
23.
HastieR.ParkB. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258
24.
HilbigB. E. (2009). Sad, thus true: Negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 983-986. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.012
25.
HilbigB. E. (2012). Good things don’t come easy (to mind). Explaining framing effects in judgments of truth. Experimental Psychology, 59, 38-46. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000124
26.
JohnsonH. M.SeifertC. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1420-1436. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420
27.
KahnemanD.FrederickS. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KochT.PeterC.ObermaierM. (2013). Optimisten glaubt man nicht. Wie sich valenzbasiertes Framing auf die Glaubwürdigkeit von Aussagen und deren Kommunikator auswirkt [Optimists do not believe you. How valence based framing affects the credibility of statements and their communicator]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 61, 551-567.
29.
KochT.ZerbackT. (2013). Helpful or harmful? How frequent repetition affects perceived statement credibility. Journal of Communication, 63, 993-1010. doi:10.1111/jcom.12063
30.
KuklinskiJ. H.QuirkP. J.JeritJ.SchwiederD.RichR. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. Journal of Politics, 62, 790-816. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00033
31.
LavineH. (2002). On-line versus memory-based process models of political evaluation. In MonroeK. R. (Ed.), Political psychology (pp. 225-274). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
LeinerD. (2012). SoSci Panel: The noncommercial online access panel. Poster presented at the General Online Research Conference, Mannheim, Germany.
LewandowskyS.EckerU. K. H.SeifertC. M.SchwarzN.CookJ. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106-131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018
35.
MackieD. M.AsuncionA. G. (1990). On-line and memory-based modification of attitudes: Determinants of message recall-attitude change correspondence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 5-16. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.5
36.
MandlerG. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252
37.
MatthesJ.WirthW.SchemerC. (2007). Measuring the unmeasurable? Toward operationalizing on-line and memory-based political judgments in surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 247-257. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm001
38.
NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303-330. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
39.
NyhanB.ReiflerJ.RicheyS.FreedG. L. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133, 835-842. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112
40.
ParksC. M.TothJ. P. (2006). Fluency, familiarity, aging, and the illusion of truth. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13, 225-253. doi:10.1080/138255890968691
41.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123-205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
42.
ReberR.SchwarzN. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338-342. doi:10.1006/ccog.1999.0386
43.
ReberR.SchwarzN.WinkielmanP. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
44.
ReberR.WinkielmanP.SchwarzN. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008
45.
RoggeveenA. L.JoharG. V. (2002). Perceived source variability versus familiarity: Testing competing explanations for the truth effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 81-91. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_02
46.
SchwartzM. (1982). Repetition and rated truth value of statements. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 393-407. doi:10.2307/1422132
47.
SchwarzN.SannaL. J.SkurnikI.YoonC. (2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 127-161. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X
48.
SkurnikI.YoonC.ParkD. C.SchwarzN. (2005). How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 713-724. doi:10.1086/426605
SrullT. K.WyerR. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.58
51.
TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2001). On-line versus memory-based processing: The role of “need to evaluate” in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1599-1612. doi:10.1177/01461672012712004
52.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
53.
UnkelbachC. (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17, 339-345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01708.x
54.
UnkelbachC. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 219-230. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219
55.
UnkelbachC.BayerM.AlvesH.KochA.StahlC. (2011). Fluency and positivity as possible causes of the truth effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 594-602. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.015
56.
WilkesA. L.LeatherbarrowM. (1988). Editing episodic memory following the identification of error. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 40, 361-387. doi:10.1080/02724988843000168
