This study presents a media content analysis of representations of the Square Kilometre Array telescope on Twitter by South African users, drawing on a sample of 1,588 Tweets recorded over a period of 1 year from September 2011 to August 2012. The framing of the Square Kilometre Array was dominated by the site allocation process, which focused on the contestation between South Africa and Australia and formed a proxy discourse for politico-symbolic themes that framed the project as a symbol of African achievement. The overall composition of messages is dominated by large media firms, but there remains substantial scope for individual agency in shaping the discourse, particularly for high-profile users and leading science journalists. Micro-determinants also played a key role in shaping the virality of messages.
AlderS. (2010). Competition and innovation: Does the distance to the technology frontier matter? (Working Paper No. 493). Zurich, Switzerland: Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
2.
AndersonA. A.BrossardD.ScheufeleD. A.XenosM. A.LadwigP. (2014). The “nasty effect”: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 373-387.
3.
BauerM. W. (2005). Public perception and mass media in the biotechnology controversy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(1), 5-22.
4.
BonfadelliH. (2005). Mass media and biotechnology: Knowledge gaps within and between European countries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(1), 42-62.
5.
BrossardD. (2015). New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(Suppl. 3), 14096-14101.
6.
BrossardD.ScheufeleD. (2013). Science, new media, and the public. Science, 339, 40-41.
ClaassenG. N. (2001a). Exploring a model for training journalism students. Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies, 22(1), 3-24.
9.
ClaassenG. N. (2001b). Science communication: A process of mutual education. Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 12, 249-250.
10.
ClaassenG. N. (2011). Covering science in South Africa: Perspectives of science journalists (Research report for the South African Science Journalists’ Association). Cape Town, South Africa.
11.
ClaytonJ.JoubertM. (2012). The need for an African science news service (Report prepared on behalf of SciDev.Net for the UK National Commission for UNESCO).
12.
DudoA.BrossardD.ShanahanJ.ScheufeleD.MorganM.SignorielliN. (2011). Science on television in the 21st century: Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communication Research, 48, 754-777.
13.
FagerbergJ.VerspagenB. (2006, September). Innovation studies: The emerging structure of a new scientific field (TIK Working Papers on Innovation Studies No. 20090104). Brighton, England: Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, and Centre for Advanced Study, Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters.
14.
FinleyD. (2002). Public relations for a national observatory, in organizations and strategies. In HeckA. (Ed.), Organizations and strategies in astronomy (Vol. 3., pp. 21-34). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
15.
GastrowM. (2010). The public understanding of biotechnology in the media (A report for the National Advisory Council on Innovation and the National Biotechnology Advisory Committee). Pretoria, South Africa: National Sciences Research Council.
16.
GastrowM. (2015). The stars in our eyes: representations of the Square Kilometre Array telescope in the South African media (Doctoral dissertation). University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
17.
GottschalkK. (2005, November). The political uses of astronomy. Paper presented at the African Astronomical History Symposium, Cape Town, South Africa.
18.
HabermasJ. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, England: Policy Press. (Original work published 1962)
LewensteinB. V. (1993). NASA and the public understanding of space science. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 46, 251-254.
21.
LiangX.LeonaY. S.YeoS. K.ScheufeleD. A.BrossardD.XenosM.. . . CorleyC. A. (2014). Building buzz: (Scientists) communicating science in new media environments. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(4), 772-791.
MadsenC. (2001). Stars in the Media: Coverage of astronomy and space science in the European quality print media (Master’s thesis). Open University, Buckinghamshire, England.
24.
MadsenC.WestR. M. (2001, February). Public communication of astronomy. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
25.
MadsenC.WestR. M. (2000). Public outreach in astronomy: The ESO experience. In HeckA. (Ed.), Information handling in astronomy (Vol. 3., pp. 25-43). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
26.
MartinB. R. (2008, August). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies (TIK Working Papers on Innovation Studies No. 20080828). Brighton, England: Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, and Centre for Advanced Study, Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters.
27.
McQuailD. (2005). McQuail’s mass communication theory (5th ed.). London: Sage.
28.
National Science Board. (2012). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding (Science and Engineering Indicators 2012). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
29.
NelkinD. (1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York, NY: Freeman.
30.
NisbetM. C.LewensteinB. V. (2002). Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication, 23, 359-391.
31.
RungeK. K.YeoS. K.CacciatoreM.ScheufeleD. A.BrossardD.XenosM.SuL. Y. F. (2013). Tweeting nano: How public discourses about nanotechnology develop in social media environments. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15(1), 1-11.
32.
SchäferM. S. (2012). Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 650-663.
33.
SugimotoC.ThelwallM.LarivièreV.TsouA.MongeonP.MacalusoB. (2013). Scientists popularizing science: Characteristics and impact of TED talk presenters. PLoS One, 8, e62403.
WeingartP.EngelsA.PansegrauP. (2000) Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 261-283.
36.
WildS. (2012). Searching African skies. Cape Town, South Africa: Jacana.
