Two satirical television news programs, The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, cover climate change in ways that affirm the existence of global warming. This study uses data from an experiment (N = 424) to test whether exposure to these programs’ coverage can influence viewers’ certainty that global warming is happening. It also examines whether viewers’ political beliefs predict their interpretations of the programs’ messages about climate change, whether such interpretations are related to viewers’ climate change perceptions, and whether the effects of the programs vary depending on viewers’ political beliefs.
AntillaL. (2005). Climate of scepticism: U.S. newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 338-352.
2.
BaumM. (2003). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BaumgartnerJ.MorrisJ. S. (2006). The Daily Show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34, 341-367.
4.
BaumgartnerJ. C.MorrisJ. S. (2008). One “nation,” under Stephen? The effects of The Colbert Report on American youth. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 622-643.
5.
BaymG. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22, 259-276.
6.
BaymG. (2007). Representation and the politics of play: Stephen Colbert’s better know a district. Political Communication, 24, 359-376.
7.
BaymG. (2009). Stephen Colbert’s parody of the postmodern. In GrayJ.JonesJ. P.ThompsonE. (Eds.), Satire TV: Politics and comedy in the post-network era (pp. 123-146). New York: NYU Press.
8.
BordR. J.O’ConnorR. E.FisherA. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205-218.
9.
BoykoffM. T. (2007). Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39, 470-481.
10.
BoykoffM. T. (2008). Lost in translation? United States television coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995-2004. Climatic Change, 86(1-2), 1-11.
11.
BoykoffM. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BoykoffM. T.BoykoffJ. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the U.S. prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136.
13.
BrewerP. R. (2013). The trappings of science: Media messages, scientific authority, and beliefs about paranormal investigators. Science Communication, 35, 311-333.
14.
BrewerP. R.CaoX. (2006). Candidate appearances on soft news shows and public knowledge about primary campaigns. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 18-35.
15.
BrewerP. R.MarquardtE. (2007). Mock news and democracy: Analyzing The Daily Show. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 15, 249-267.
16.
BrossardD.NisbetM. C. (2007). Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding U.S. opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 24-52.
17.
CaoX. (2008). Political comedy shows and knowledge about primary campaigns: The moderating effects of age and education. Mass Communication and Society, 11(1), 43-61.
18.
CaoX. (2010). Hearing it from Jon Stewart: The impact of The Daily Show on public attentiveness to politics. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), 26-46.
19.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
CorbettJ. B.DurfeeJ. L. (2004). Testing public (un) certainty of science media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26, 129-151.
21.
FeldmanL. (2013). Cloudy with a chance of heat balls: The portrayal of global warming on The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. International Journal of Communication, 7, 430-451.
22.
FeldmanL.LeiserowitzA.MaibachE. (2011). The science of satire: The Daily Show and The Colbert Report as sources of public attention to science and the environment. In AmarasingamA. (Ed.), The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the real impacts of fake news (pp. 25-46). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
23.
FeldmanL.MaibachE. W.Roser-RenoufC.LeiserowitzA. (2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 3-31.
24.
FoxJ. R.KoloenG.SahinV. (2007). No joke: A comparison of substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and broadcast network television coverage of the 2004 presidential election campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 213-227.
HardyB. W.GottfriedJ. A.WinnegK. M.JamiesonK. H. (2014). Stephen Colbert’s civics lesson: How Colbert Super PAC taught viewers about campaign finance. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 329-53.
27.
HartP. S. (2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33, 28-51.
28.
HmielowskiJ. D.FeldmanL.MyersT. A.LeiserowitzA.MaibachE. (2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 866-883. doi:10.1177/0963662513480091
29.
HollanderB. A. (2005). Late-night learning: Do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers?Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 402-415.
30.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). Climate change 2013. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
JamiesonK. H.CappellaJ. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
JonesJ. P. (2010). Entertaining politics: Satiric television and political engagement (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
33.
KramerM. W.HessJ. A. (2002). Communication rules for the display of emotions in organizational settings. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 66-80.
LaMarreH. (2013). When parody and reality collide: Examining the effects of Colbert’s Super PAC satire on issue knowledge and policy engagement across media formats. International Journal of Communication, 7, 394-413.
36.
LaMarreH. L.LandrevilleK. D.BeamM. A. (2009). The irony of satire: Political ideology and the motivation to see what you want to see in The Colbert Report. International Journal of Press/Politics, 14, 212-231.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 499-522.
39.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on US climate change policy. Social Problems, 50, 348-373.
40.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194.
41.
MorrisJ. S. (2009). The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and audience attitude change during the 2004 party conventions. Political Behavior, 31(1), 79-102.
NisbetM. C.ScheufeleD. A.ShanahanJ.MoyP.BrossardD.LewensteinB. V. (2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 29, 584-608.
PolkJ.YoungD. G.HolbertR. L. (2009). Humor complexity and political influence: An elaboration likelihood approach to the effects of humor type in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 17, 202-219.
46.
Pew Research Center. (2008). Journalism, satire or just laughs? The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, examined (Project for Excellence in Journalism). Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/node/10953
PriorM. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 130-143.
50.
QuickB. L. (2009). The effects of viewing Grey’s Anatomy on perceptions of doctors and patient satisfaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(1), 38-55.
51.
ScheufeleD. A.LewensteinB. V. (2005). The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7, 659-667.
52.
XenosM. A.BeckerA. B. (2009). Moments of Zen: Effects of The Daily Show on information seeking and political learning. Political Communication, 26, 317-332.
53.
YoungD. G. (2013). Laughter, learning, or enlightenment? Viewing and avoidance motivations behind The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 153-169.
54.
YoungD. G.HoffmanL. (2012). Acquisition of current-events knowledge from political satire programming: An experimental approach. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 20, 290-304.
55.
YoungD. G.TisingerR. M. (2006). Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11, 113-134.
