This study examines the influence of media messages about paranormal investigators on perceptions of how scientific and credible such investigators are, as well as on beliefs about paranormal phenomena such as ghosts and haunted houses. The analyses use experimental data to test the effects of three different versions of a news story about paranormal investigators: one version presenting them with “trappings of science” such as technology and jargon, another presenting them in terms of traditional supernaturalism, and yet another debunking them as unscientific. The analyses also test whether various forms of media use predict perceptions regarding paranormal investigators and phenomena.
AllumN. (2011). What makes some people think that astrology is scientific?Science Communication, 33, 341-366.
2.
BaderC. D.MenckenF. C.BakerJ. O. (2010). Paranormal America: Ghost encounters, UFO sightings, Bigfoot hunters, and other curiosities in religion and culture. New York: New York University Press.
3.
BarnettM.WagnerH.GatlingA.AndersonJ.HouleM.KafkaA. (2006). The impact of science fiction film on student understanding of science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 179-191.
4.
BrewerP. R.LeyB. L. (2010). Media use and public perceptions of DNA evidence. Science Communication, 32, 93-117.
5.
GerbnerG.GrossL.MorganM.SignorielliN. (1994). Growing up with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
HawesJ.WilsonG.FriedmanM. J. (2007). Ghost hunting: True stories of unexplained phenomena from The Atlantic Paranormal Society. New York, NY: Pocket Books.
7.
HornigS. (1990). Television’s NOVA and the construction of scientific truth. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 11-23.
8.
KirbyD. A. (2003). Scientists on the set: Science consultants and the communication of science in visual fiction. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 261-278.
9.
KramerM. W.HessJ. A. (2002). Communication rules for the display of emotions in organizational settings. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 66-80.
10.
LeyB. L.JankowskiN.BrewerP. R. (2012). Investigating CSI: Portrayals of DNA testing on a forensic crime show and their potential effects. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 51-67.
11.
LongM.SteinkeJ. (1996). The thrill of everyday science: Images of science and scientists on children’s education science programmes in the United States. Public Understanding of Science, 5, 101-119.
PerseE. M. (2001). Media effects and society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
PetteyG. R.BrackenC. C. (2008). The CSI effect: Scientists and priming on prime time television. In HoldermanL. (Ed.), Common sense: Intelligence as presented on popular television (pp. 233-248). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
19.
QuickB. L. (2009). The effects of viewing Grey’s Anatomy on perceptions of doctors and patient satisfaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 38-55.
RamseyM. C.VenetteS. J.RabalaisN. (2011). The perceived paranormal and source credibility: The effects of narrative suggestion on paranormal belief. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 19, 79-96.
22.
SaganC. (1997). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
23.
ShanahanJ.MorganM. (1999). Television and its viewers: Cultivation theory and research. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
24.
ShrumL. J. (2002). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 69-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
SparksG. G.HansenT.ShahR. (1994). Do televised depictions of paranormal events influence viewers’ paranormal beliefs?Skeptical Inquirer, 18, 386-395.
26.
SparksG. G.MillerW. (2001). Investigating the relationship between exposure to television programs that depict paranormal phenomena and beliefs in the paranormal. Communication Monographs, 68, 98-113.
27.
SparksG. G.NelsonC. L.CampbellR. G. (1997). The relationship between exposure to televised messages about paranormal phenomena and paranormal beliefs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 345-359.
28.
SparksG. G.PellechiaM. (1997). The effect of news stories about UFOs on readers’ UFO beliefs: The role of confirming or disconfirming testimony from a scientist. Communication Reports, 10, 165-172.
29.
SparksG. G.PellechiaM.IrvineC. (1998). Does television news about UFOs affect viewers’ UFO beliefs? An experimental investigation. Communication Quarterly, 46, 284-294.
30.
StelterB. (2009, November11). Ghost Hunters seeks spirits and rating. New York Times, p. C3.
31.
SulemanD. (2007, October31). Tracking ghost stories to the eerie end: When hunting for the paranormal, these Jersey experts enlist some high-tech help. Star-Ledger, p. 13.
32.
WilcoxL. (2010, June20). The Haunted: The debate about whether ghosts exist will never be settled, but for paranormal investigator John Warfield, it’s all about the search for proof. Washington Post, p. W10.
