In demands for transparency in livestock production, how should the industry deal with communicating the sensitive topic of slaughter? This study examined the different effects of livestock slaughter transparency (via video) on slaughter and transparency attitudes based on people’s animal value orientation and the effects on the clarity and comfort of euphemisms. Findings indicated the video increased slaughter acceptance among all animal value orientations. All groups expected a high level of transparency from the industry regardless of the video. With respect to euphemisms, while slaughter was considered clearer, harvest was more comfortable.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
AkerlofG. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500.
3.
BeulensA. M.BroensD.FolstarP.HofstedeG. (2005). Food safety and transparency in food chains and networks relationships and challenges. Food Control, 16, 481-486.
4.
BovenkerkB. (2006). Biotechnology, disagreement and the limitations of public debate. In KaiserM.LienM. E. (Eds.), Ethics and the politics of food (pp. 97-102). Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic.
5.
BromF. W. A. (1999). Food, consumer concerns, and trust: Food ethics for a globalizing market. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12, 127-139.
6.
CroneyC. C. (2008). The ethics of semantics: Do we clarify or obfuscate reality to influence perceptions of farm animal production?Poultry Science, 87, 387-391.
7.
DietzT. (2013). Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Suppl. 3), 14081-14087.
8.
FoxN.WardK. (2008). Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations. Appetite, 50, 422-429.
9.
GalvinS. L.HerzogH. A.Jr. (1992). Ethical ideology, animal rights activism, and attitudes toward the treatment of animals. Ethics & Behavior, 2, 141-149.
10.
GellynckX.VerbekeW.VermeireB. (2006). Pathways to increase consumer trust in meat as a safe and wholesome food. Meat Science, 74, 161-171.
11.
GolanE.KuchlerF.MitchellL.GreeneC.JessupA. (2001). Economics of food labeling. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24, 117-184.
12.
HerzogH. A.BetchartN. SPittmanR. (1991). Gender, sex role identity and attitudes toward animals. Anthrozoos, 4, 184-191.
13.
HerzogH. A.BurghardtG. M. (1988). Attitudes toward animals: Origins and diversity. Anthrozoos, 1, 214-222.
14.
HerzogH. A.McGeeS. (1983). Psychological-aspects of slaughter: Reactions of college-students to killing and butchering cattle and hogs. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 4, 124-132.
15.
HolderR. W. (2008). Dictionary of euphemisms. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
HooglandC. T.de BoerJ.BoersemaJ. J. (2005). Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history. Appetite, 45, 15-23.
17.
JensenK. K.SandøeP. (2002). Food safety and ethics: The interplay between science and values. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15, 245-253.
18.
JohnsonJ. (2008). Dosage: A bridging metaphor for theory and practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2, 137-153.
19.
Kees-Jan vanD. (2003). Beef labelling: The emergence of transparency. Supply Chain Management, 8, 32-40.
20.
KiE.HonL. (2009). Causal linkages between relationship cultivation strategies and relationship quality outcomes. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3, 242-263.
21.
KorthalsM. M. (2001). Ethical dilemmas in sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 36, 813-820.
22.
LakoffG. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
LernerJ. E.KalofL. (1999). The animal text: Message and meaning in television advertisements. Sociological Quarterly, 40, 565-586.
24.
LoughnanS.HaslamN.BastianB. (2010). The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite, 55, 156-159.
25.
MieleM.EvansA. (2010). When foods become animals: Ruminations on ethics and responsibility in care-full practices of consumption. Ethics, Place and Environment, 13(2), 171-190.
26.
NaylorR.MayeD.IlberyB.EnticottG.KirwanJ. (2014). Researching controversial and sensitive issues: Using visual vignettes to explore farmers’ attitudes towards the control of bovine tuberculosis in England. Area, 46, 285-293.
27.
NisbetM. C.ScheufeleD. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96, 1767-1778. doi:10.3732/ajb.0900041
28.
PardoR.CalvoF. (2008). Attitudes toward embryo research, worldviews, and the moral status of the embryo frame. Science Communication, 30, 8-47. doi:10.1177/1075547008319432
29.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (2014). Meat.org: The website the meat industry doesn’t want you to see. Retrieved from http://www.meat.org
30.
PetersonR. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450-461. doi:10.1086/323732
31.
PlousS. S. (1993). Psychological mechanisms in the human use of animals. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 11-52.
32.
QuarantaG. (2007). Knowledge, responsibility and culture: Food for thought on science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 6(4), 1-5.
33.
QinW.BrownJ. L. (2006). Consumer opinions about genetically engineered salmon and information effect on opinions: A qualitative approach. Science Communication, 28, 243-272. doi:10.1177/1075547006294770
34.
RawlinsB. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 71-99.
RubyM. B. (2012). Vegetarianism: A blossoming field of study. Appetite, 58, 141-150.
37.
SappS. G.KorschingP. F.ArnotC.WilsonJ. H. (2013). Science communication and the rationality of public opinion formation. Science Communication, 35, 734-757. doi:10.1177/1075547013480491
38.
SchwartzS. H.MelechG.LehmannA.BurgessS.HarrisM.OwensV. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542.
39.
TonsorG. T.WolfC. A. (2012). Effect of video information on consumers: Milk production attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94, 503-508.
