How Motivated Reasoning and Temporal Frames May Polarize Opinions About Wildlife Disease Risk

Abstract

We draw from theories of motivated reasoning, dual-processing models, and attribution of responsibility to examine how scientific messages may increase public polarization with respect to emerging risk issues such as Lyme disease. A nationally representative sample of Americans (N = 460) read messages about Lyme disease that varied the framing of responsibility for the prevalence of the disease (human/wildlife vs. wildlife only) and when its effects will occur (today vs. in the next 10 years). The influence of framing was contingent on participants’ partisanship, which resulted in a boomerang effect among Republicans and increased the degree of political polarization regarding support for proenvironmental behaviors.

Keywords

framing motivated reasoning temporal distance dual-processing One Health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bomberg

Schlosberg

(2008). US environmentalism in comparative perspective. Environmental Politics, 17, 337-348. doi:10.1080/09644010801936263

Bord

R. J.

O’Connor

R. E.

Fisher

(2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205-218. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301

Boykoff

M. T.

Boykoff

J. M.

(2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136.

Byrne

Hart

P. S.

(2009). The “boomerang” effect: A synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. In Beck

(Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 33, pp. 3-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Callegaro

DiSogra

(2009). Computing response metrics for online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 1008-1032. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn065

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Lyme disease incidence rates by state, 2003-2012. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/lyme/stats/chartstables/incidencebystate.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Lyme disease: What you need to know. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/lyme/resources/brochure/lymediseasebrochure.pdf

Chaiken

(1980). Heuristic versus systematic information-processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.

Chandran

Menon

(2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 375-389. doi:10.1086/422116

10.

Chong

Druckman

J. N.

(2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101, 637-655. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070554

11.

Cutler

S. J.

Fooks

A. R.

van der Poel

W. H.

(2010). Public health threat of new, reemerging, and neglected zoonoses in the industrialized world. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 16(1), 1-7. doi:10.3201/eid1601.081467

12.

Decker

D. J.

Siemer

W. F.

Wild

M. A.

Castle

K. T.

Wong

Leong

K. M.

Evensen

D. T. N.

(2011). Communicating about zoonotic disease: Strategic considerations for wildlife professionals. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 35, 112-119. doi:10.1002/wsb.29

13.

DesJardin

J. R.

(2005). Environmental ethics: Invitation to environmental philosophy (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

14.

Ditto

P. H.

Lopez

D. F.

(1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568-584. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568

15.

Druckman

J. N.

(2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23, 225-256.

16.

Druckman

J. N.

Bolsen

(2011). Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. Journal of Communication, 61, 659-688. doi:10.1111/J.1460-2466.2011.01562.X

17.

Dunlap

R. E.

Allen

M. P.

(1976). Partisan differences on environmental issues: A congressional roll-call analysis. Western Political Quarterly, 29, 384.

18.

Dunlap

R. E.

Xiao

McCright

A. M.

(2001). Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 10, 23-48. doi:10.1080/714000580

19.

Entman

R. M.

(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

20.

Environmental Protection Agency. (2014). Climate change indicators in the United States. Retrieved http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/health-society/lyme.html

21.

Eyal

Liberman

Trope

(2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204-1209. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012

22.

Gollust

S. E.

Cappella

J. N.

(2014). Understanding public resistance to messages about health disparities. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 493-510. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.821561

23.

Gollust

S. E.

Lantz

P. M.

Ubel

P. A.

(2009). The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2160-2167.

24.

Halpenny

E. A.

(2010). Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 409-421. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.006

25.

Hart

P. S.

Nisbet

E. C.

(2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39, 701-723. doi:10.1177/0093650211416646

26.

Hawkins

C. B.

Nosek

B. A.

(2012). Motivated independence? Implicit party identity predicts political judgments among self-proclaimed Independents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1437-1452. doi:10.1177/0146167212452313

27.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

28.

Howe

P. D.

Leiserowitz

(2013). Who remembers a hot summer or a cold winter? The asymmetric effect of beliefs about global warming on perceptions of local climate conditions in the U.S. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1488-1500. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.014

29.

Iyengar

(1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: Univeristy of Chicago Press.

30.

Kahan

D. M.

(2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407-424.

31.

Kahn

L. H.

Kaplan

Monath

T. P.

Steele

J. H.

(2008). Teaching “One Medicine, One Health.” American Journal of Medicine, 121, 169-170. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.09.023

32.

Keesing

Belden

L. K.

Daszak

Dobson

Harvell

C. D.

Holt

R. D.

. . .Ostfeld

R. S.

(2010). Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature, 468, 647-652. doi:10.1038/nature09575

33.

Keith

B. E.

Magleby

D. B.

Nelson

C. J.

Orr

Westlye

M. C.

Wolfinger

R. E.

(1992). The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.

34.

Kenski

H. C.

Kenski

M. C.

(1980). Partisanship, ideology, and constituency differences on environmental issues in the US House of Representatives: 1973–78. Policy Studies Journal, 9, 325-335. doi:10.1111/1541-0072.ep11817502

35.

Knight

(2014, May). Tracking down ticks: Lyme disease research project underway in the Adirondacks. Adirondack Daily Enterprise. Retrieved from http://adirondackdailyenterprise.com/page/content.detail/id/543228/Tracking-down-ticks.html

36.

Krosnick

J. A.

Holbrook

A. L.

Lowe

Visser

P. S.

(2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climate Change, 77(1-2), 7-43. doi:10.1007/S10584-006-9068-8

37.

Krosnick

J. A.

Holbrook

A. L.

Visser

P. S.

(2000). The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 239-260. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/303

38.

Kunda

(1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

39.

Levi

Kilpatrick

A. M.

Mangel

Wilmers

C. C.

(2012). Deer, predators, and the emergence of Lyme disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 10942-10947. doi:10.1073/pnas.1204536109

40.

Lewandowsky

Ecker

U. K. H.

Seifert

C. M.

Schwarz

Cook

(2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106-131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018

41.

Maibach

E. W.

Nisbet

M. C.

Baldwin

Akerlof

Diao

G. Q.

(2010). Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health, 10, 299. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-299

42.

McCright

A. M.

Dunlap

R. E.

(2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194. doi:10.1111/J.1533-8525.2011.01198.X

43.

McElroy

Mascari

(2007). When is it going to happen? How temporal distance influences processing for risky-choice framing tasks. Social Cognition, 25, 495-517. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.4.495

44.

McElroy

Seta

J. J.

(2003). Framing effects: An analytic–holistic perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 610-617. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00036-2

45.

Mooney

(2012). The Republican brain: The science of why they deny science and reality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

46.

Muller

Judd

C. M.

Yzerbyt

V. Y.

(2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 89, 852-863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852

47.

Nelkin

(1987). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

48.

Nisbet

E. C.

Hart

P. S.

Myers

Ellithorpe

(2013). Attitude change in competitive framing environments? Open-/closed-mindedness, framing effects, and climate change. Journal of Communication, 63, 766-785. doi:10.1111/jcom.12040

49.

O’Connor

R. E.

Bord

R. J.

Yarnal

Wiefek

(2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Social Science Quarterly, 83, 1-17. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.00067

50.

Ojala

Lidskog

(2011). What lies beneath the surface? A case study of citizens’ moral reasoning with regard to biodiversity. Environmental Values, 20, 217-237. doi:10.3197/096327111x12997574391760

51.

Peffley

Hurwitz

(2007). Persuasion and resistance: Race and the death penality in America. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 996-1012.

52.

Petrocik

J. R.

(2009). Measuring party support: Leaners are not independents. Electoral Studies, 28, 562-572. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2009.05.022

53.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York NY: Springer.

54.

Petty

R. E.

Rucker

D. D.

Bizer

G. Y.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2004). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Seister

J. S.

Gass

R. H.

(Eds.), Perspectives on persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 65-89). Boston, MA: Pearson.

55.

Rock

Buntain

B. J.

Hatfield

J. M.

Hallgrimsson

(2009). Animal-human connections, “One Health,” and the syndemic approach to prevention. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 991-995. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.047

56.

Roh

Hancock

J. T.

(2014). Ideology. In Levine

T. R.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of deception (pp. 496-499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

57.

Schuldt

J. P.

Roh

(2014). Of accessibility and applicability: How heat-related cues affect belief in “global warming” versus “climate change.” Social Cognition, 32, 219-240.

58.

Singer

M. C.

(2009). Doorways in nature: Syndemics, zoonotics, and public health. A commentary on Rock, Buntain, Hatfield & Hallgrimsson. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 996-999. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.041

59.

Spence

Poortinga

Pidgeon

(2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957-972. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x

60.

Stenmark

(2002). Environmental ethics and policy-making. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

61.

Taber

C. S.

Lodge

(2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769. doi:10.1111/J.1540-5907.2006.00214.X

62.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463. doi:10.1037/a0018963

63.

Weiner

(2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

64.

Zwickle

Wilson

R. S.

(2014). Construing risk: Implications for risk communication In Arvai

Rivers

(Eds.), Effective risk communication (pp. 190-203). New York, NY: Routledge.