Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Building on research in motivated reasoning and framing in science communication, we examine how messages that vary attribution of responsibility (human vs animal) and temporal orientation (now vs in the next 10 years) for wildlife disease risk influence individuals’ conservation intentions. We conducted a randomized experiment with a nationally representative sample of US adults (N = 355), which revealed that for people low in biospheric concern, messages that highlighted both human responsibility for and the imminent nature of the risk failed to enhance conservation intentions compared with messages highlighting animal responsibility. However, when messages highlighting human responsibility placed the risk in a temporally distal frame, conservation intentions increased among people low in biospheric concern. We assess the underlying mechanism of this effect and discuss the value of temporal framing in overcoming motivated skepticism to improve science communication.

Keywords

attribution of responsibility biospheric concern framing One Health pro-environmental behavior science communication temporal distance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

West

(1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Cassidy

Mills

(2012) “Fox tots attack shock”: Urban foxes, mass media and boundary-breaching. Environmental Communication 6(4): 494–511.

Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance (2014) Questions and answers on Chronic Wasting disease for hunters. Available at: http://www.cwd-info.org/pdf/CWD%20Brochure.pdf

Conrad

Mazet

Clifford

Scott

Wilkes

(2009) Evolution of a transdisciplinary “one medicine-one health” approach to global health education at the University of California, Davis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 92(4): 268–274.

De Groot

JIM

Steg

(2008) Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior 40(3): 330–354.

Decker

Siemer

Wild

Castle

Wong

Leong

et al . (2011) Communicating about zoonotic disease: Strategic considerations for wildlife professionals. Wildlife Society Bulletin 35(2): 112–119.

Halpenny

(2010) Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(4): 409–421.

Kahan

(2013) Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making 8(4): 407–424.

Keesing

Belden

Daszak

Dobson

Harvell

Holt

et al . (2010) Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature 468(7324): 647–652.

10.

Luguri

Napier

(2013) Of two minds: The interactive effect of construal level and identity on political polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(6): 972–977.

11.

McComas

Schuldt

Burge

Roh

(2015) Communicating about marine disease: The effects of message frames on policy support. Marine Policy 57: 45–52.

12.

McElroy

Mascari

(2007) When is it going to happen? How temporal distance influences processing for risky-choice framing tasks. Social Cognition 25(4): 495–517.

13.

Muller

Judd

Yzerbyt

(2005) When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(6): 852–863.

14.

National Park Service (NPS) (2014) Chronic Wasting disease, 28 October. Available at: http://www.nps.gov/shen/naturescience/cwd.htm (accessed 28 October 2014).

15.

Nisbet

Cooper

Ellithorpe

(2015) Ignorance or bias? Evaluating the ideological and informational drivers of communication gaps about climate change. Public Understanding of Science 24(3): 285–301.

16.

Rabinowitz

Odofin

Dein

(2008) From “us vs. them” to “shared risk”: Can animals help link environmental factors to human health? Ecohealth 5(2): 224–229.

17.

Rock

Buntain

Hatfield

Hallgrimsson

(2009) Animal-human connections, “One Health,” and the syndemic approach to prevention. Social Science & Medicine 68(6): 991–995.

18.

Roh

McComas

Rickard

Decker

(2015) How motivated reasoning and temporal frames may polarize opinions about wildlife disease risk. Science Communication 37(3): 340–370.

19.

Schultz

(2001) The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(4): 327–339.

20.

Singer

(2009) Doorways in nature: Syndemics, zoonotics, and public health. A commentary on Rock, Buntain, Hatfield & Hallgrimsson. Social Science & Medicine 68(6): 996–999.

21.

Van Der Werff

Steg

Keizer

(2013) The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 34: 55–63.

22.

Yang

DYJ

Preston

Hernandez

(2012) Polarized attitudes toward the ground zero mosque are reduced by high-level construal. Social Psychological & Personality Science 4(2): 244–250.

23.

Zinsstag

Schelling

Wyss

Mahamat

(2006) Potential of cooperation between human and animal health to strengthen health systems. The Lancet 366(9503): 2142–2145.

24.

Zwickle

Wilson

(2014) Construing risk: Implications for risk communication. In: Arvai

Rivers

(eds) Effective Risk Communication. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 190–203.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB