A novel approach to teaching scientific reasoning and writing to science journalism students, as presented here, shows considerable promise. First, the pedagogical approach and a description of seven types of common episodes in the experimental testing of models are outlined. Then, a rubric for evaluating the quality of reasoning is presented. Science writers can use this scheme to identify patterns in scientific reasoning as they interview practicing scientists and write press releases.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
MauldinR. F. (2011). Definition and formulation of scientific prediction and its role in inquiry-based laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 449-450.
5.
MauldinR. F.LonneyL. (1999). Scientific reasoning for nonscience majors: Ronald N. Giere’s approach. Journal of College Science Teaching, 28, 416-421.
6.
WhiteheadA. N. (1925). Science and the modern world. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
