Knowledge transfer and exchange has become an increasingly important practice in the arena of publicly funded health and social research. Throughout its history, investigators have used a variety of borrowed theories to explore and explain the determinants, processes, and results of knowledge transfer. As the context in which knowledge transfer takes place has changed, so too has the theory used to explore and explain the process. This article reviews the role of theory in knowledge transfer and exchange research and proposes a novel source for potentially useful new theory in the current context: social epistemology.
Backer, T.E.1991. Knowledge utilization: The third wave. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization12 (3): 225-40.
2.
Barnes, B., and D. Edge, eds. 1982. Science in context: Readings in the sociology of science. Cambridge, MA: MITUniversity Press.
3.
Berwick, D.M.2003. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA289 (15): 1969-75.
4.
Boggs, J.P.1992. Implicit models of social knowledge use. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization14 (1): 29-62.
5.
Budd, J.M.2002. Jesse Shera, social epistemology and praxis. Social Epistemology16 (1): 93-98.
6.
Caplan, N.1979. The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist22 (3): 459-70.
7.
Crosswaite, C., and L. Curtice.1994. Disseminating research results—the challenge of bridging the gap between health research and health action. Health Promotion International9 (4): 289-96.
8.
Dery, D.1986. Knowledge and organizations. Policy Studies Review6 (1): 14-25.
9.
Dobbins, M., D. Ciliska, R. Cockerill, J. Barnsley, and A. DiCenso.2002. A framework for the dissemination and utilization of research for health-care policy and practice. The Online Journal of Knowledge Synthesis forNursing9 (7).
10.
Egan, M.E., and J.H. Shera.1952. Foundations of a theory of bibliography . Library Quarterly22: 125-37.
11.
Elliott, H., and J. Popay.2000. How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilization and local NHS policy making. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health54: 461-68.
12.
Fricker, M.1998. Rational authority and social power: Towards a truly social epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society98: 159-77.
13.
Fuller, S.2002. Social epistemology. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
14.
Glaser, B., and A. Strauss.1967. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
15.
Goldman, A.2001. Social epistemology. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/epistemology-social/
16.
Goldman, A.I.2002. Pathways to knowledge: Private and public. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Hanney, S.R., M.A. Gonzalez-Block, M. Buxton, and M. Kogan.2003. The utilization of health research in policy-making: Concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems1 (2). Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/1/1/2
18.
Hardwig, J.1991. The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy88 (12): 693-708.
19.
Herie, M., and G.W. Martin.2002. Knowledge diffusion in social work: A new approach to bridging the gap. Social Work47 (1): 85-95.
20.
Huberman, M.1990. Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal27 (2): 363-91.
21.
Huberman, M.1994. Research utilization: The state of the art. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization7 (4): 13-33.
22.
Knorr-Cetina, K., and M. Mulkay, eds. 1983. Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage.
23.
Landry, R., N. Amara, and M. Lamari.2001. Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. ResearchPolicy30: 333-49.
24.
Langley, A.1989. In search of rationality: The purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly34: 598-631.
25.
Latour, B., and S. Woolgar.1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Lester, J.P., and L.J. Wilds.1990. The utilization of public policy analysis: A conceptual framework. Evaluation and Program Planning13: 313-19.
27.
Logan, J., and I.D. Graham.1998. Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Science Communication20 (2): 227-46.
28.
Lomas, J.2000. Connecting research and policy. ISUMA1 (1): 140-44.
29.
McConkey, J.2004. Knowledge and acknowledgement: “Epistemic injustice” as a problem of recognition. Politics24 (3): 198-205.
30.
Oh, C.H., and R.F. Rich.1996. Explaining use of information in public policymaking. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization9 (1): 3-35.
31.
Resnik, D.1996. Social epistemology and the ethics of research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science27 (4): 565-86.
32.
Rogers, E.M.1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York : Free Press.
33.
Schmitt, F.F.1994. Socializing epistemology: An introduction through two sample issues. In Socializing epistemology, edited by F. F. Schmitt, 1-27. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
34.
Weiss, C.H.1979. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review39: 426-31.
35.
Wingens, M.1990. Toward a general utilization theory: A systems theory reformulation of the two-communities metaphor. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization12 (1): 27-42.
36.
Zandonade, T.2004. Social epistemology from Jesse Shera to Steve Fuller. Library Trends52 (4): 810-32.
