Learning to communicate research well through posters involves far more than formatting issues such as font size. The conventions of poster presentations as social practices are part of academic apprenticeship in many health disciplines. This case study examines doctoral students’ poster presentations as a research-process genre. The article maps genre knowledge required of novice researchers: poster form, creation processes, presentation practices, and underlying values. Complexity arises from the multiple roles that posters must fulfill, combined with formatting restrictions, the nature of audience interaction, and prestige issues. Posters are often considered as second class compared to oral presentations, perhaps unfairly. The reuse of posters raises questions about publication as academic currency and appropriate knowledge-exchange practices. Poster presentations are evolving with digital media, which may affect competence development in this multimodal form of research communication. Future research should consider how posters’ technology-influenced evolution affects interaction, communicative purposes, and the texts themselves.
Bazerman, C.1988. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
6.
Bazerman, C., J. Little, and T. Chavkin. 2003. The production of information for genred activity spaces. Written Communication20(4): 455-477.
7.
Bennett, N., J. Lockyer, K. Mann, H. Batty, K. LaForet, J. J. Rethans, and I. Silver. 2004. Hidden curriculum in continuing medical education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions24 (3): 145-152.
8.
Berkenkotter, C., and T. N. Huckin. 1993. Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication10 (4): 475-509.
9.
Blakeslee, A. M.1997. Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ. Journal of Business and Technical Communication11 (2): 125-169.
10.
Block, S. M.1996. Do’s and don’ts of poster presentations. Biophysical Journal71: 3527-3529.
11.
Bracher, L., J. Cantrell, and K. Wilkie. 1998. The process of poster presentation: A valuable experience. Medical Teacher20 (6): 552-557.
12.
Briscoe, M. H.1996. Preparing scientific illustrations. A guide to better posters, presentations, and publications. 2nd ed.New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
Brooks-Brunn, J. A.1996. Poster etiquette. Applied Nursing Research9 (2): 97-99.
14.
Brown, J. S., A. Collins, and P. Duguid. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher18 (1): 32-42.
15.
Brown, J. S., and P. Duguid. 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science2 (1): 40-57.
16.
Coffey, A., and P. Atkinson. 1996. Making sense of qualitative data: Complimentary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Denzine, G. M.1999. An example of innovative teaching: Preparing graduate students for poster presentations. Journal of College Student Development40 (1): 91-93.
18.
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto. 2004. Guidelines for preparing your poster for presentation. http://phs.med.utoronto.ca/PHSdayPoster.asp (accessed May 3, 2004).
19.
De Simone, R., J. Rodrian, B. Osswald, F. Sack, E. De Simone, and S. Hagel. 2001. Letter to the Editor. Initial experience with a new communication tool: The ‘Digital Interactive Poster Presentation’. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery19: 953-955.
20.
Dubois, B. L.1985a. Popularization at the highest level: Poster sessions at biomedical meetings. International Journal of the Sociology of Language56: 67-84.
21.
Dubois, B. L.. 1985b. Poster sessions at biomedical meetings: Design and presentation. The ESP Journal4: 37-48.
22.
Fishelov, D.1993. Metaphors of genre. The role of analogies in genre theory. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
23.
Gherardi, S.2000. Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization7 (2): 211-223.
24.
Gherardi, S.. 2001. From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations54 (1): 131-139.
25.
Giltrow, J.1994. Genre and the pragmatic concept of background knowledge. In Genre and the new rhetoric, edited by A. Freedman and P. Medway, 155-178. London: Taylor and Francis.
26.
Gosling, P. K.1999. Scientist’s guide to poster presentations. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
27.
Hay, I., and S. M. Thomas. 1999. Making sense with posters in biological science education. Journal of Biological Education33 (4): 209-214.
28.
Hess, G. R., and L. H. Liegel. 2000. Creating effective poster presentations. http://www.ncsu.edu/project/posters/IndexStart.html (accessed November 15, 2004).
29.
Howenstine, E., I. Hay, E. Delaney, J. Bell, F. Norris, A. Whelan, M. Pirani, T. Chow, and A. Ross. 1988. Using a poster exercise in an introductory geography course. Journal of Geography in Higher Education12 (2): 139-147.
30.
Hyland, K.1998. Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics30 (4): 437-455.
31.
International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC). 2003. Poster presentation guidelines. http://www.tourhosts.com.au/ifac2003/documents/Poster_Presentation_Advice.pdf (accessed December 12, 2004).
32.
Keegan, D. A., and S. L. Bannister. 2003. Effect of colour coordination of attire with poster presentation popularity. Canadian Medical Association Journal169 (12): 1291-1292.
33.
Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse. London: Arnold.
34.
Kvale, S.1996. InterViews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Leach, J. P.1998. The poster session: Is the writing on the wall? British Medical Journal316 (7125): 157-157.
36.
Lempp, H., and C. Seale. 2004. The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: Qualitative study of medical students’ perceptions of teaching. British Medical Journal329 (7469): 770-773.
37.
Lofland, J., and L. H. Lofland. 1995. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. 3rd ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
38.
Martin, P. A.1994. Ask an expert. Poster tips for the novice viewer. Applied Nursing Research7 (4): 208-210.
39.
Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Miller, C. R.1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech70: 151-167.
41.
Miller, L., C. Johnson, and A. Weaver. 2002. Expanded guidelines for giving a poster presentation. http://www.asp.org/education/howto_onPosters.html (accessed March 5, 2004).
42.
Miracle, V. A.2003. How to do an effective poster presentation in the workplace. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing22 (4): 171-172.
43.
Moore, L. W., P. Augspurger, M. O’B. King, and C. Profitt. 2001. Insights on the poster preparation and presentation process. Applied Nursing Research14 (2): 100-104.
44.
Nicol, A. A. M., and P. M. Pexman. 2003. Displaying your findings: A practical guide for creating figures, posters, and presentations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45.
Paré, A., and G. Smart. 1994. Observing genres in action: Towards a research methodology. In Genre and the new rhetoric, edited by A. Freedman and P. Medway, 146-154. London: Taylor and Francis.
46.
Phillips, N., and C. Hardy. 2002. Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Potter, J., and M. Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage.
48.
Powell-Tuck, J., S. Leach, and L. MacCready. 2002. Electronic poster presentations in BAPEN: A controlled evaluation. Clinical Nutrition21 (3): 261-263.
49.
Räisänen, C.2002. The conference forum: A system of interrelated genres and discursive practices. In The language of conferencing, edited by E. Ventola, C. Shalom, and S. Thompson, 69-93. New York: Peter Lang.
50.
Reba, R. C.1979. Relative advantages and disadvantages of poster presentations at a scientific meeting. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine20 (6): 582-582.
51.
Rowley-Jolivet, E.2002. Visual discourse in scientific conference papers: A genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes21: 19-40.
52.
Russell, C. K., D. M. Gregory, and M. F. Gates. 1996. Aesthetics and substance in qualitative research posters. Qualitative Health Research6 (4): 542-552.
53.
Russell, C. L., and E. Good. 2002. Developing a professional poster presentation. International Transplant Nurses Society. http://www.itns.org/education/posterpresent.html (accessed March 5, 2004).
54.
Schryer, C. F.1994. The lab vs. the clinic: Sites of competing genres. In Genre and the new rhetoric, edited by A. Freedman and P. Medway, 105-124. London: Taylor and Francis.
55.
Shalom, C.1993. Established and evolving spoken research process genres: Plenary lecture and poster session discussions at academic conferences. English for Specific Purposes12: 37-50.
56.
Shalom, C.. 2002. The academic conference: A forum for enacting genre knowledge. In The language of conferencing, edited by E. Ventola, C. Shalom, and S. Thompson, 51-68. New York: Peter Lang.
Swales, J. M.1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Swales, J. M.. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Swales, J. M., and C. B. Feak. 2000. Research on display—the conference poster. In English in today’s research world: A writing guide, 80-113. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
61.
Taylor, S.2001. Evaluating and applying discourse analytic research. In Discourse as data, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. Yates, 311-330. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
Tham, M. T. 1997. Poster presentation of research work. http://lorien.ncl.ac.uk/ming/Dept/Tips/present/posters.htm (accessed February 24, 2004).
63.
van Naerssen, M.1984. Science conference poster presentations in an ESP program. The ESP Journal3: 47-52.
64.
Wenger, E.2000. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization7 (2): 225-246.
65.
Wengraf, T.2001. Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
66.
Wilson, H. S., and S. A. Hutchinson. 1997. Presenting qualitative research up close: Visual literacy in poster presentations. In Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue, edited by J. M. Morse, 63-85. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
Wittich, W. A., and C. F. Schuller. 1973. Instructional technology: Its nature and use. 4th ed.New York: Harper and Row.
68.
Wolcott, T. G.1997. Mortal sins in poster presentations or how to give the poster no one remembers. Newsletter of the Society for Integrative and Comparative BiologyFall: 10-10.
69.
Woolsey, J. D.1989. Combating poster fatigue: How to use visual grammar and analysis to effect better visual communication. Transactions in Neurosciences (TINS)12 (9): 325-332.
70.
Wright, V., and J. M. H. Moll. 1987. Proper poster presentation: A visual and verbal ABC. British Journal of Rheumatology26: 292-294.
