American adults learn about science and health from numerous sources including television. The Pew studies demonstrate that half of American adults watch a local television news show three times a week or more, making local television news the most widely used news medium. This study examines the impact of a program to increase the use of science and health stories in local newscasts. The results show substantial story recall and information retention. The analysis suggests that science and health stories in local television newscasts may either enhance viewers’ existing science/health schemas or foster the development of new schemas for less well-known constructs.
Alexrod, R.1973. Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. American Political Science Review67: 1248-1266.
2.
Almond, G. A.1950. The American people and foreign policy. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
3.
Anderson, R. C.1984. Some reflections on the acquisition of knowledge. Educational Researcher13 (9): 5-10.
4.
Bennett, S. E., S. L. Rhine, and R. S. Flickinger. 2004. The things they cared about: Change and continuity in Americans’ attention to different news stories, 1989-2002. Press/Politics9 (1): 5-99.
5.
Conover, P. J., and S. Feldman. 1984. How people organize the political world: A schematic model. American Journal of Political Science28: 98-100.
6.
Fiske, S. T., and D. R. Kinder. 1981. Involvement, expertise, and schema use: Evidence from political cognition. In Personality, cognition and social interaction, edited by N. Cantor and J. F. Kihlstrom, 171-190. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Fiske, S. T., and S. E. Taylor. 1991. Social cognition. 2d ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Graber, D. A.1988. Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. White Plains, NY: Longman.
9.
Hayduk, L. A.1987. Structural equation modeling with LISREL. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
Inglehart, R., M. Basáñez, J. Díez-Medrano, L. Halman, and R. Luijkx. 2004. Human beliefs and values. Delegaciòn Coyoacán, Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
11.
Johnson, J. D.1997. Cancer-related information seeking. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
12.
Jöreskog, K., and D. Sörbom. 1993. Lisrel 8. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
13.
Kurpius, D. D.2003. Bucking a trend in local television news: Combating market-driven journalism. Journalism4 (1): 76-94.
14.
Lau, R. R., and D. O. Sears. 1986. Social cognition and political cognition. In Political cognition, edited by R. R. Lau and D. O. Sears, 347-366. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Miller, J. D.1983a. The American people and science policy: The role of public attitudes in the policy process. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
16.
Miller, J. D.1983b. Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus112 (2): 29-48.
17.
Miller, J. D.1987. Scientific literacy in the United States. In Communicating science to the public, edited by D. Evered and M. O’Connor, 19-40. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
18.
Miller, J. D.1992. From town meeting to nuclear power: The changing nature of citizenship and democracy in the United States. In The United States Constitution: Roots, rights, and responsibilities, edited by A. E. D. Howard, 327-338. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
19.
Miller, J. D.1995. Scientific literacy for effective citizenship. In Science/technology/society as reform in science education, edited by R. E. Yager, 185-204. New York: State University of New York Press.
20.
Miller, J. D.1998. The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science7: 1-21.
21.
Miller, J. D.2000. The development of civic scientific literacy in the United States. In Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook on research and practice, edited by D. D. Kumar and D. Chubin, 21-47. New York: Plenum.
22.
Miller, J. D.2001. The acquisition and retention of scientific information by American adults. In Free-choice science education, edited by J. H. Falk, 93-114. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
Miller, J. D.2004. Public understanding of, and attitudes toward scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science13: 273-294.
24.
Miller, J. D., and L. G. Kimmel. 2001. Biomedical communications: Purposes, audiences, and strategies. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
Miller, J. D., and R. Pardo. 2000. Civic scientific literacy and attitude to science and technology: A comparative analysis of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. In Between understanding and trust: The public, science, and technology, edited by M. Dierkes and C. von Grote, 81-129. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
26.
Miller, J. D., R. Pardo, and F. Niwa. 1997. Public perceptions of science and technology: A comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Madrid: BBV Foundation.
27.
National Science Board (NSB). 1998. Science and engineering indicators—1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
28.
National Science Board (NSB). 2000. Science and engineering indicators—2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29.
Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2004. News audiences increasingly politicized: Online news audience larger, more diverse. June 8, 2004. Available at http://www.people-press.org.
31.
Pick, H. L., P. van den Broek, and D. C. Knill. 1992. Cognition: Conceptual and methodological issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
Popper, K.1969. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Rosenstiel, T., C. Gottlieb, and L. A. Brady. 2000. Time of peril for TV news: Quality sells, but commitment—and viewership—continue to erode. Columbia Journalism Review39 (4): 84-89.
34.
Schank, R. C., and R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry in human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Sternberg, R. J.2003. Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Sternberg, R. J., and T. Ben-Zeev. 2001. Complex cognition: The psychology of human thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Tanner, A. H.2004. Agenda building, source selection, and health news at local television stations: A nationwide survey of local television health reporters. Science Communication25 (4): 350-363.
