Natural-resource managers have used a variety of computer-mediated presentation methods to communicate management practices to diverse publics. We explored the effects of visualizing and animating predictions from mathematical models in computerized presentations explaining forest succession (forest growth and change through time), fire behavior, and management options. In an experimental design using purposive samples, rural-mountain, town, and student groups gained substantial information from both the visualized, animated presentation and the nonvisualized, nonanimated presentation. Mountain residents gained significantly more information from the visualized and animated presentation than from the nonvisualized and nonanimated presentation.
Andrews, P. L., and L. P. Queen. 2001. Fire modeling and information system technology. International Journal of Wildland Fire10 (3): 343-352.
2.
Barrett, T. M.2001. Models of vegetative change for landscape planning: A comparison of FETM, LANDSUM, SIMPPLLE, and VDDT. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-76 WWW. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
3.
Bergen, S. D., R. J. McGaughey, and J. L. Fridley. 1998. Data-driven simulation, dimensional accuracy and realism in a landscape visualization tool. Landscape and Urban Planning40 (4): 283-293.
4.
Borchelt, R. E.2001. Communicating the future. Science Communication23 (2): 194-211.
5.
Campbell, S., and J. C. Stanley. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
6.
Chaffee, S. 1971. Psuedo-data in communication research. Symposium on Co-orientation. Association for Education in Journalism, Communication Theory and Methodology Division, Columbia, SC, August.
7.
Chen, C., and Y. Yu.2000. Empirical studies of information visualization: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies53:851-866.
8.
Dixon, G. E., compiler. 2002. Essential FVS: A user’s guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Forest Management Service Center.
9.
Fazio, J. R., and D. L. Gilbert. 1981. Public relations and communication for natural resource managers. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
10.
Fazio, J. R., and D. L. Gilbert. 1986. Public relations and communication for natural resource managers. 2nd ed.Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
11.
Fazio, J. R., and D. L. Gilbert. 2000. Public relations and communication for natural resource managers. 3rd ed.Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
12.
Friedson, E.1972. Communication research and the concept of mass. In The process and effects of mass communication, edited by W. Schramm and D. F. Roberts, 198-208. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
13.
Fornwalt, P. J., M. R. Kaufmann, L. S. Huckaby, and J. M. Stoker. 2002. Using the Forest Vegetation Simulator to reconstruct historical stand conditions in the Colorado Front Range. In Second Forest Vegetation Simulator conference, edited by N. L. Crookston and R. N. Havis, Proceedings RMRS-P-25, 108-115. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
14.
Gilbert, D.1964. Public relations in natural resource management. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.
15.
Gilbert, D.1971. Public relations in natural resource management. Washington, DC: The Wildlife Society.
16.
Grunig, J. E.1989. Publics, audiences and market segments: Segmentation principles for campaigns. In Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change, edited by C. T. Salmon, 199-228. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research, vol. 18. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Hobbs, N. T.2000. Seven habits for successful collaboration with local governments. Journal of Forestry, Focus section, 98 (4): 1-2.
18.
Juanillo, N. K. Jr., and C. W. Scherer. 1995. Attaining a state of informed judgments: Toward a dialectical discourse on risk. In Communication yearbook 18, edited by B. Burleson, 278-299. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Kaufmann, M. R., P. J. Fornwalt, L. S. Huckaby, and J. M. Stoker. 2001. Cheesman Lake: A historical ponderosa pine landscape guiding restoration in the South Platte watershed of the Colorado Front Range. In R. K. Vance, W. W. Covington, and C. B. Edminster, tech. coords. Ponderosa pine ecosystems restoration and conservation: Steps toward steward-ship; 25-27 April 2000, Flagstaff, AZ. Proceedings RMRS-P-00. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
20.
Kaufmann, M. R., L. Huckaby, and P. Gleason. 2000. Ponderosa pine in the Colorado Front Range: Long historical fire and tree recruitment intervals and a case for landscape heterogeneity. In Crossing the millennium: Integrating spatial technologies and ecological principles for a new age in fire management, vol. 1, edited by L. R. Neuenschwander, K. C. Ryan, G. E. Gollberg, and J. D. Greer, 153-160. Moscow: University of Idaho and International Association of Wildland Fire.
21.
Kaufmann, M. R., C. M. Regan, and P. M. Brown. 2000. Heterogeneity in ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir forests: Age and size structure in unlogged and logged landscapes of central Colorado. Canadian Journal of Forest Research30 (5): 698-711.
22.
Keane, R. E., and D. G. Long. 1998. A comparison of coarse scale fire effects simulation strategies. Northwest Science72 (2): 76-90.
23.
Large, A.1996. Computer animation in an instructional environment. Library and Information Science Research18 (1): 2-23.
24.
McCarter, J. B., J. S. Wilson, P. J. Baker, J. L. Moffett, and C. D. Oliver. 1998. Landscape management through integration of existing tools and emerging technologies. Journal of Forestry96 (6): 17-23.
25.
McGaughey, R. J. 1997. Visualizing forest stand dynamics using the stand visualization system. In Proceedings of the 1997 ACSM/ASPRS Annual Convention and Exposition, 7-10 April 1997, 248-257. Seattle, WA, and Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 4.
26.
McGaughey, R. J.1998. Techniques for visualizing the appearance of forestry operations. Journal of Forestry96 (6): 9-14.
27.
McQuillan, A. G.1998. Honesty and foresight in computer visualizations. Journal of Forestry96 (6): 15-16.
28.
McVicker, G. 2000. Community-based stewardship: A model for applied science. Paper presented at the Aurora Partnership national meeting, Charleston, SC, 14-15 November.
29.
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing. 2002. Study shows just how much visuals increase persuasiveness. Available from http://www.3m.com/meetingnetwork/presentations/pmag_visualsstudy.html (accessed 30 September 2002).
30.
Mladenoff, D. J., and W. L. Baker, 1999. Development of forest and landscape modeling approaches. In Spatial modeling of forest landscape change: Approaches and applications, edited by D. J. Mladenoff and W. L. Baker, 1-13. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Moore, M., L. Nawrocki, and Z. Simutis, 1979. The instructional effectiveness of three levels of graphics displays for computer-assisted instruction Report No. ARI-TP-359, ERIC Document Service No. ED 178 057. Arlington, VA: Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Sciences.
32.
Mowrer, H. T. ed. 1997. Decision support systems for ecosystem management: An evaluation of existing systems. General Technical Report RM-GTR-296. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
33.
O’Keefe, G. J., H. H. Boyd, and H. Brown. 1998. Who learns preventive health care information from where: Cross channel and repertoire comparisons. Health Communication10 (1): 25-36.
34.
O’Keefe, G. J., H. J. Ward, and R. Shepard. 2002. A repertoire approach to environmental information channels. Science Communication23 (4): 392-409.
35.
Reed, S.1985. Effect of computer graphics on improving estimates to algebra word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology77 (3): 285-298.
36.
Reinhardt, E. D., R. E. Keane, and J. K. Brown. 2001. Modeling fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire10 (3): 373-380.
37.
Rieber, L. P.1990. Animation in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development38 (1): 77-86.
38.
Rieber, L. P., M. Boyce, and M. A. Alkindi. 1991. Effects of visual grouping strategies of computer animated presentations on selective attention in science. Educational Technology Research and Development39 (4): 5-15.
39.
Rieber, L., M. Boyce, and C. Assad. 1990. The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction17 (2): 46-52.
40.
Rieber, L. P., and M. J. Hannafin. 1988. Effects of textual and animated orienting activities and practice on learning from computer-based instruction. Computers in Schools5 (1/2): 77-89.
41.
Rogers, E.2003. Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed.New York: Free Press.
42.
Sheppard, S. R. J.1986. Simulating changes in the landscape. In Foundations for visual project analysis, edited by R. C. Smardon and J. P. Palmer, 198-199. New York: John Wiley.
43.
McGaughey, R. J.1997. Visualizing forest stand dynamics using the stand visualization system. In Proceedings of the 1997 ACSM/ASPRS Annual Convention and Exposition, 7-10 April 1997, 248-257. Seattle, WA, and Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 4.
44.
McGaughey, R. J.1989. Visual simulation: A user’s guide for architects, engineers, and planners. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.
45.
Simons, T., H. Andres, and C. Petersen. 2000. Multimedia or bust. Presentations14:40-49.
46.
Stage, A. R.1973. Prognosis model for stand development. Research Paper INT-137. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
47.
Stamm, K. R.1972. Environment and communication. In Current perspectives in mass communication research, edited by F. G. Kline and P. J. Tichenor, 265-294. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
Vogel, D. R., G. Dickson, and J. Lehman. 1986. Persuasion and the role of visual presentation support: The UM/3M Study. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota’s Management Information Systems Research Center.
49.
Weber, J. R., and C. S. Word. 2001. The communication process as evaluative context: What do nonscientists hear when scientists speak?BioScience51 (6): 487-495.
50.
Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resources management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
51.
Wykoff, W. F., N. L. Crookston, and A. R. Stage. 1982. User’s guide to the stand prognosis model. General Technical Report INT-133. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
