This study uses a descriptive survey to examine the perceptions agricultural scientists have of the news media and the perceived need for media relations skills. The results showed that respondents were more negative about national news coverage and more positive about local news coverage of agricultural and scientific stories. They also were more favorable in their perceptions of coverage of general science topics than of stories in their agricultural discipline. Significant differences were found in respondents’ confidence in communicating with the news media on the basis of gender and age. Overall, respondents were confident in their media relations capabilities; however, areas in which respondents indicated they might take training included communicating in crisis situations and writing newspaper columns.
Altschul, B. J. 2003. A dynamic public relations case class: I don’t know anything about science and you want me to say what? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Kansas City, MO, Fall.
2.
Coon, T. K., and M. J. Cantrell. 1985. Agriculture in black and white. The Agriculture Education Magazine58:22-23.
3.
Dillman, D. A.1999. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley.
4.
Duke, S.2002. Wired science: Use of the World Wide Web and e-mail in science public relations. Public Relations Review28:311-324.
5.
Dunwoody, S.1999. Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty. In Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science, edited by S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers, 59-79. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Frick, M. J., R. J. Birkenholz, and K. Machtmes. 1995. Rural and urban adult knowledge and perceptions of agriculture. Journal of Agriculture Education36:44-53.
7.
Gascoigne, T., and J. Metcalfe. 1997. Incentives and impediments to scientists communicating through the media. http://www.usyd.edu.au/su/fasts/1997/GascoigneMetcalfe.html.
8.
Grandcolas, U., R. Rettie, and K. Marusenko. 2003. Web survey bias: Sample or mode effect?Journal of Marketing Management19:1-21.
9.
Greenberg, M. R., P. M. Sandman, D. B. Sachsman, and K. L. Salomone. 1989. Network television news coverage of environmental risks. Environment31 (2): 16-20, 40-43.
10.
Hagins, S., J. Lockaby, C. Akers, and K. Lance. 2002. Associated Press wire service coverage of agricultural issues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Association of Agricultural Scientists, Agricultural Communications Section, Orlando, FL, February.
11.
Hartz, J., and R. Chappell. 1997. Worlds apart. Nashville, TN: First Amendment Center.
12.
Malone, R. E., E. Boyd, and L. A. Bero. 2000. Science in the news: Journalists’ constructions of passive smoking as a social problem. Social Studies of Science30:713-735.
13.
McComas, K., and J. Shanahan. 1999. Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research26 (1): 30-57.
14.
Metcalfe, J., and T. Gascoigne. 1995. Science journalism in Australia. Public Understanding of Science4 (4): 411-428.
15.
Metcalfe, J., and T. Gascoigne. 1997. Media skills workshops: Breaking down the barriers between scientists and journalists. http://www.pantaneto.co.uk/issue3/Metcalfe.htm.
16.
Nelkin, D.1995. Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York: W. H.
17.
Freeman. Reed, R.2001. (Un-)professional discourse? Journalists’ and scientists’ stories about science in the media. Journalism2:279-298.
18.
Reed, R., and G. Walker. 2002. Listeningto scientists and journalists. Nieman Reports56 (3): 45-46.
19.
Sheehan, K. B., and S. J. McMillan. 1999. Response variation in e-mail surveys: An exploration. Journal of Advertising Research39:45-54.
20.
Southern Association of Agricultural Scientists. 2002. Introduction to the Southern Association of Agricultural Scientists. http://cals.agnis.vt.edu/saas/navigator/intro.html.
21.
Stringer, S., and J. Thomson. 1999. Defining agricultural issues: Daily newspaper editors’ perspectives. Paper presented at Agricultural Communicators in Education/National Extension Technology Conference, Knoxville, TN, June.
22.
Treise, D., and M. F. Weigold. 2002. Advancing science communication: A survey of science communicators. Science Communication23:310-322.
23.
Wilkins, L.1987. Shared vulnerability: Media coverage and public perception of the Bhopal disaster. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
24.
Wilson, K. M.2000. Drought, debate, and uncertainty: Measuring reporters’ knowledge and ignorance about climate change. Public Understanding of Science9 (1): 1-13.
25.
Zehr, S. C.2000. Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science9 (2): 85-103.
