This work uses a qualitative approach coupled with a quantitative software-based methodology to examine the Italian news media coverage of radiation in the early decades of the twentieth century. We analyze 80 news stories from two of the most influential Italian newspapers from that time: La Stampa (a daily newspaper) and La Domenica del Corriere (an Italian Sunday supplement). While much of previous research on media coverage of scientific topics was generally focused on present-day news, our work revolves around the ground-breaking discovery of X-rays and radioactivity at the dawn of the last century. Our analysis aims to identify journalistic frames in the news coverage of radiation that journalists might have used to emphasize the benefits (or the risks) of the new discoveries. We also hypothesize how this kind of news coverage might have influenced public perception of technological, commercial, and public health applications of the new scientific advancements.
AndersonA (2009) Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass3(2): 166–182.
2.
BauerMWBucchiM (eds.) (2007) Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communication Between News and Public Relations. New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BenelliE (2003) The role of the media in steering public opinion on healthcare issues. Health Policy63: 179–186.
4.
BenfordRDSnowDA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology26: 611–639.
5.
BolascoSPavoneP (2010) Automatic dictionary- and rule-based systems for extracting information from text. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization5: 189–198.
6.
BordoniCFossatiF (1985) Dal feuilleton al fumetto. Generi e scrittori della letteratura popolare [From serial novels to comics. Genres and writers of popular literature]. Rome: Editori Riuniti.
7.
BradleyJ (ed.) (2000) Learning to Glow: A Nuclear Reader. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
8.
BrecherRBrecherE (1969) The Rays: A History of Radiology in the United States and Canada. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
9.
BroderickM (ed.) (1996) Hibakusha Cinema. Hiroshima, Nagasaki and the Nuclear Image in Japanese Film. London; New York, NY: Kegan Paul International.
10.
BucchiM (2011) La scienza nella stampa quotidiana [Science coverage in daily news]. In: CassataFPoglianoC (eds) Scienze e cultura dell’Italia Unita. Storia d’Italia. Annali [Science and culture in united Italy. Italian history. Annals] (Vol. 26). Turin: Einaudi, pp. 297–320.
11.
BucchiMTrenchB (eds) (2008) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London; New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
CandelaA (2013) Dal sogno degli alchimisti agli incubi di Frankenstein. La scienza e il suo immaginario nei mass media [From the alchemists’ dream to Frankenstein’s nightmares. Science and its imagery in the media]. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
13.
CapraraG (2009) L’avventura della scienza. Sfide, invenzioni e scoperte nelle pagine del Corriere della Sera [The adventure of science. Challenges, inventions and discoveries in the pages of “Corriere della Sera”]. Milan: Rizzoli.
14.
CastellsM (2009) Communication Power. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
ChapmanSLuptonD (1994) The Fight for Public Health: Principles and Practice of Media Advocacy. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
16.
ChongDDruckmanJN (2007) Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science10: 103–126.
17.
ClarkC (1997) Radium Girls: Women and Industrial Health Reform, 1910–1935. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
18.
DarntonR (1975) Writing news and telling stories. Daedalus104(2): 175–194.
19.
de la PeñaCT (2003) The Body Electric: How Strange Machines Built the Modern American. New York, NY: New York University Press.
20.
EntmanR (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43: 51–58.
21.
EpsteinEJ (1981) The selection of reality. In: AbelE (ed.) What’s News: The Media in American Society. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies, pp. 119–132.
22.
FarrRMMoscoviciS (eds) (1984) Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
FeinbergMWillerR (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science24(1): 56–62.
24.
FernandezB (2006) Unraveling the Mystery of the Atomic Nucleus: A Sixty Year Journey 1896–1956. New York, NY; Heidelberg; Dordrecht; London: Springer.
25.
GaltungJRugeMH (1965) The structure of foreign news. The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research2(1): 64–91.
26.
GamsonWAModiglianiA (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1–37.
27.
GavrilaM (ed.) (2012) L’onda anomala dei media. Il rischio ambientale tra realtà e rappresentazione [The media tsunami. Environmental risk between reality and representation]. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
28.
GersonES (2004) X-ray mania: The X-ray in advertising, circa 1895. Radiographics24(2): 544–551.
29.
GiereRN (1988) Explaining Science. A Cognitive Approach. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
32.
GoldingPElliottP (1979) Making the News. London: Longman.
33.
GorssJBLewensteinBVRadinJ (2005) The salience of small: Nanotechnology coverage in the American press. Paper presented at the 55th annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, NY, 26–30 May 2005.
34.
GozziniG (2000) Storia del giornalismo [History of journalism]. Milan: Mondadori.
35.
GuizzardiG (ed.) (2002) La scienza negoziata. Scienze biomediche nello spazio pubblico [Science and social negotiation. Biomedical sciences in the public arena]. Bologna: il Mulino.
36.
HajerMA (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37.
HechtG (1998) The Radiance of France. Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
HendershotC (1997) The atomic scientists, science fiction films, and paranoia. Journal of American Culture20(1): 31–41.
39.
HerzigR (1999) Removing roots: “North American Hiroshima Maidens” and the X Ray. Technology and Culture40(4): 723–745.
40.
IyengarS (1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
JensenKB (ed.) (2002) A Handbook of Media and Communication Research. Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies. London: Routledge.
42.
LaFolletteM (1990) Making Science Our Own: Public Images of Science, 1910–1955. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
43.
LavineM (2013) The First Atomic Age. Scientists, Radiations, and the American Public, 1895–1945. New York, NY: Macmillan.
44.
LeeAJ (1976) The Origins of the Popular Press, 1855–1914. London: Croom Helm.
45.
LewensteinBRadinJDielsJ (2007) Nanotechnology in the media: A preliminary analysis. In: RocoMCBainbridgeWS (eds) Nanotechnology: Societal Implications II: Individual Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 258–265.
46.
MacklisRM (1990) Radithor and the era of Mild Radium Therapy. Journal of the American Medical Association264(5): 614–618.
47.
MarianiF (1976) “Realtà romanzesca” nella “Domenica del Corriere” 1922–1941 [“Fictional reality” in the pages of “Domenica del Corriere” 1922–1941]. Ravenna: Longo.
48.
MorrissonMS (2007) Modern Alchemy. Occultism and the Emergence of Atomic Theory. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
MottFL (1950) American Journalism. A History of Newspapers in the United States through 260 Years: 1690 to 1950. New York, NY: Macmillan.
50.
MurialdiP (1996) Storia del giornalismo italiano. Dalle gazzette a Internet [History of Italian journalism. From the early gazettes to the internet]. Bologna: il Mulino.
51.
NelkinD (1995) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
52.
NelsonTEOxleyZMClawsonRA (1997) Towards a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior19(3): 221–246.
53.
NeresiniFMagauddaP (eds) (2011) La scienza sullo schermo. La rappresentazione della tecnoscienza nella televisione italiana [Science on screen. The representation of technoscience by Italian TV networks]. Bologna: il Mulino.
54.
NeumanWRJustMRCriglerAN (1992) Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
NisbetMCLewensteinBW (2002) Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the Elite Press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication23(4): 359–391.
56.
OngWJ (1988) Orality and Literacy. The Technologizing of the Word. New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
PallottinoP (1988) Storia dell’illustrazione italiana: Libri e periodici a figure dal XV al XX secolo [History of Italian illustration: Illustrated books and periodicals from the 15th to the 20th century]. Bologna: Zanichelli.
58.
PasquaréFAOppizziP (2012) How do the media affect public perception of climate change and geohazards? An Italian case study. Global and Planetary Change90–91: 152–157.
59.
PasquaréFABettinettiRFumagalliSVignatiD (2013) Public health benefits and risks of fish consumption: Current scientific evidence v. media coverage. Public Health Nutrition16: 1885–1892.
60.
RachinoGRachinoP (2009) Miniera di Radio e Sorgenti Radioattive di Lurisia [Radon mine and radioactive springs in Lurisia]. Cuneo: Primalpe.
61.
RentetziM (2007) Trafficking Materials and Gendered Experimental Practices: Radium Research in Early Twentieth Century Vienna. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
62.
RosenthalP (1991) The nuclear mushroom cloud as cultural image. American Literary History3(1): 63–92.
63.
RutherfordE (1937) The Newer Alchemy: Based on the Henry Sidgwick Memorial Lecture delivered at Newnham College. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
RyanC (1991) Prime Time Activism: Media Strategies for Grassroots Organizing. Boston, MA: South End Press.
65.
SchonDAReinM (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
66.
ScloveRE (1989) From Alchemy to Atomic War: Frederick Soddy’s “Technology Assessment” of Atomic Energy, 1900–1915. Science, Technology, & Human Values14(2): 163–194.
67.
ShapiroJF (2002) Atomic Bomb Cinema. The Apocalyptic Imagination on Film. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
68.
SoddyF (1903) Possible future applications of radium. The Times Literary Supplement, 17July, p. 225.
69.
SoddyF (1909) The Interpretation of Radium. Being the Substance of Six Free Popular Experimental Lectures Delivered at the University of Glasgow, 1908. London: John Murray; New York, NY: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
70.
StannardNJ (1988) Radioactivity and Health. A History. Springfield, VA: Battelle Memorial Institute.
71.
ThursDP (2007) Science Talk: Changing Notions of Science in American Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
72.
TuchmanG (1977) The exception proves the rule: The study of routine news practice. In: HirschPMMillerPVKlineFG (eds) Strategies for Communication Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research (Vol. 6). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 43–62.
73.
van LenteD (ed.) (2012) The Nuclear Age in Popular Media. A Transnational History, 1945–1965. New York, NY: Macmillan.
74.
WallackLDorfmanL (1996) Media advocacy: A strategy for advancing policy and promoting health. Health Education Quarterly23: 293–317.
75.
WallackLDorfmanLJerniganDThembaM (1993) Media Advocacy and Public Health: Power for Prevention. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
76.
WeartSR (1985) The atomic age: The heyday of myth and cliché. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists41: 38–43.
77.
WeartSR (1988) Nuclear Fear. A History of Images. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
78.
WiegmanOGuttelingJMBoerHHouwenRJ (1989) Newspaper coverage of technological and environmental hazards and the reactions of readers. Journalism Quarterly66: 844–853.
79.
WillisK (1995) The origins of British Nuclear Culture, 1895–1939. Journal of British Studies34(1): 59–89.
80.
ZemanSCAmundsonAM (eds) (2004) Atomic Culture: How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
