BeutlerI. F.BurrW. R.BahrK. S.HerrinD. A. (1989). The family realm: Theoretical contributions for understanding its uniqueness. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 805-816. doi:10.2307/352178
2.
BogenschneiderK. (1995). Roles for professionals in building family policy: A case study of state Family Impact Seminars. Family Relations, 44, 5-12. doi:10.2307/584735
3.
BogenschneiderK. (2000). Has family policy come of age? A decade review of the state of U.S. family policy in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1136-1159. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01136.x
4.
BogenschneiderK.CorbettT. J. (2010). Family policy: Becoming a field of inquiry and subfield of social policy. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 783-803. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00730.x
5.
BogenschneiderK.LittleO. M.OomsT.BenningS.CadiganK.CorbettT. (2012). The family impact lens: A family-focused, evidence-informed approach to policy and practice. Family Relations, 61, 514-531. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00704.x
6.
BogenschneiderK.OlsonJ. R.LinneyK. D.MillsJ. (2000). Connecting research and policymaking: Implications for theory and practice from the Family Impact Seminars. Family Relations, 49, 327-339. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00327.x
7.
BurrW. R. (1991). Rethinking levels of abstraction in family systems theories. Family Process, 30, 435-452. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1991.00435.x
8.
BurrW. R.HerrinD. A.DayR. D.BeutlerI. F.LeighG. K. (1988). Epistemologies that lead to primary explanations in family science. Family Science Review, 1, 185-210.
DavisP.Howden-ChapmanP. (1996). Translating research findings into health policy. Social Science & Medicine, 43, 865-872. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(96)00130-X
14.
DeatrickJ. A.HobbieW.OgleS.FisherM. J.BarakatL.HardieT.. . . GinsbergJ. P. (2014). Competence in caregivers of adolescent and young adult childhood brain tumor survivors. Health Psychology, 33, 1103-1112. doi:10.1037/a0033756
15.
DunkinM. J. (1996). Types of errors in synthesizing research in education. Review of Educational Research, 66, 87-97. doi:10.3102/00346543066002087
16.
FeethamS. L. (1984). Family research in nursing. In WerleyH. H.FitzpatrickJ. (Eds.), Annual review of nursing research (Vol. 2, pp. 3-25). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
17.
FeethamS. L. (1991). Conceptual and measurement issues in research of families. In WhallA.FawcettJ. (Eds.), Family theory development in nursing (pp. 55-68). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
18.
FeethamS. L. (1997). Families and health in the urban environment: Implications for programs, research, and policy. In ReyesO.WallbergH. J.WeissbergR. P. (Eds.), Children and youth: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 321-362). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
FeethamS. L. (2005). Family nursing: Challenges and opportunities: Providing leadership in family nursing from local to global health. Journal of Family Nursing, 11, 327-331. doi:10.1177/1074840705280820
20.
FeethamS. L. (2011a). Historical overview of the importance of the relationship of family to health. In Craft-RosenbergM.PehlerS. F. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of family health (Vol. 1, pp. xxxi-xxxvi). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
FeethamS. L. (2011b). The role of science policy in programs of research and scholarship. In HinshawA. S.GradyP. (Eds.), Nursing research and policy (pp. 53-71). New York, NY: Springer.
22.
FeethamS. L.DoeringJ. J. (2015). Career cartography: A conceptualization of career development to advance health and policy. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47, 70-77. doi:10.1111/jnu.12103
23.
FeethamS. L.MeisterS. B. (1999). Nursing research of families: State of the science and correspondence with policy. In HinshawA. S.FeethamS. L.ShaverJ. L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of clinical nursing research (pp. 251-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
FrieseB.BogenschneiderK. (2009). The voice of experience: How social scientists communicate family research to policymakers. Family Relations, 58, 229-243. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00549.x
25.
GrzywaczJ. G.GanongL. (2009). Issues in families and health research. Family Relations, 58, 373-378. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00559.x
26.
GrzywaczJ. G.MiddlemissW. (2017). Looking backward, around, and forward: Family science has always been translational science. Family Relations, 66, 547-549. doi:10.1111/fare.12280
HindsP. S.OakesL. L.HicksJ.PowellB.SrivastavaD. K.BakerJ. N.. . . FurmanW. L. (2012). Parent-clinician communication intervention during end-of-life decision making for children with incurable cancer. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 15, 916-922. doi:10.1089/jpm.2012.0006
29.
Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. (2011). Toward an integrated science of research on families: Workshop report (Committee on the Science of Research on Families). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13085
30.
KellyK. P.GanongL. H. (2011). “Shifting family boundaries” after the diagnosis of childhood cancer in stepfamilies. Journal of Family Nursing, 17, 105-132. doi:10.1177/1074840710397365
31.
KnaflK.Van RiperM. (2017). Tips for developing a successful family research proposal. Journal of Family Nursing, 23, 450-460. doi:10.1177/1074840717743248
32.
LarsenA. L.OlsonD. H. (1990). Capturing the complexity of family systems: Integrating family theory, family scores, and family analysis. In DraperT. W.MarcosA. C. (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualization, measurement, and use (pp. 19-47). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
33.
LeemanJ.CrandellJ. L.LeeA.BaiJ.SandelowskiM.KnaflK. (2016). Family functioning and the well-being of children with chronic conditions: A meta-analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 39, 229-243. doi:10.1002/nur.21725
34.
LetiecqB. L.AndersonE. A. (2017). From education to advocacy and activism: Alternative approaches for translating family science to policy. Family Relations, 66, 729-740. doi:10.1111/fare.12274
35.
Loveland-CherryC. J.YoungblutJ. M.LeidyN. W. (1989). A psychometric analysis of the Family Environment Scale. Nursing Research, 38, 262-266.
36.
MorrisonB. (1974). The importance of a Balanced System. Man-Environment Systems, 4, 171-178.
37.
OgleS. K. (2006). Clinical application of family management styles to families of children with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 23, 28-31. doi:10.1177/1043454205283586
38.
ReeveB. B.McFatichM.PinheiroL.WeaverM. S.SungL.WithycombeJ. S.. . . HindsP. S. (2017). Eliciting the child’s voice in adverse event reporting in oncology trials: Cognitive interview findings from Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events initiative. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 64, e26261. doi:10.1002/pbc.26261
39.
RosaE. M.TudgeJ. R. H. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 243-258. doi:10.1111/jftr.12022
40.
RosenfieldP. L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 35, 1343-1357. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-R
41.
TudgeJ. R. H.MokrovaI.HatfieldB.KarnikR. B. (2009). Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1, 198–210. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00026.x
42.
WakefieldR. A.AllenC.WashchuckC. (Eds.). (1979). Family research: A source book, analysis and guide to federal funding (Vol. 1). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
43.
WilsonD. S.RosembergM.-A. S.VisovattiM.Munro-KramerM. L.FeethamS. (2017). Career cartography: From stories to science and scholarship. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 49, 336-346. doi:10.1111/jnu.12289