Nurses make choices about how to situate themselves in relation to the people they encounter in clinical practice. In this article, the notion of resisting the view of the “nurse as expert” is offered as a caution against some of the ways that professional values and practices of experts can influence relational skills in clinical nursing practice with families. These ideas are based on a hermeneutic research project that explored the advanced clinical practice of nurses engaged in therapeutic conversations with families experiencing ischemic heart disease. Exemplars from the research project illustrate relational practices that can counterbalance expert professional views by explicitly acknowledging the expertise and knowledge of those persons and families encountered in practice. These practices include offering commendations, coevolving a description using the family’s language, exploring the illness story and the medical story, asking questions that invite reflection, and initiating conversations about family members’ preferences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bell, J. M.
, Wright, L. M., & Duhamel, F. (1998, February). Inside the intervention: Using hermeneutic inquiry to examine the use of reflecting teams in clinical practice. Paper presented at the Fourth International Multidisciplinary Qualitative Health Research Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
2.
Caputo, J. D.
(1993). Against ethics: Contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
3.
Foucault, M.
(1965). Madness and civilization (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Random House.
4.
Foucault, M.
(1973). The birth of the clinic: An archeology of medical perception. London: Tavistock.
5.
Foucault, M.
(1984). The means of correct training. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 188-205). New York: Pantheon Books.
6.
Frank, A. W.
(1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Freedman, J.
, & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. New York: W. W. Norton.
8.
Gadamer, H. G.
(1960/1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.) (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
9.
Gadamer, H. G.
(1976). Philosophical hermeneutics (D. E. Linge, Ed. & Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
Gadamer, H. G.
(1981). Reason in the age of science (F. G. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Gadamer, H. G.
(1996). The enigma of health (J. Gaiger & N. Walker, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12.
Kleinman, A.
(1988). The illness narratives: Suffering, healing, and the human condition. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Loos, F.
, & Bell, J. M. (1990). Circular questions: A family interviewing strategy. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 9, 46-53.
14.
Lutzen, K.
, & Tishelman, C. (1996). Nursing diagnosis: A critical analysis of underlying assumptions. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 33(2), 190-200.
15.
McElheran, N. G
, & Harper-Jaques, S. R. (1994). Commendations: A resource intervention for clinical practice. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 8, 7-10.
16.
Mitchell, G. J.
(1991). Nursing diagnosis: An ethical analysis. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23, 99-103.
17.
O’Hanlon, W. H.
(1993). Possibility therapy: From iatrogenic injury to iatrogenic healing. In S. Gilligan & R. Price (Eds.), Therapeutic conversations (pp. 3-21). New York: W. W. Norton.
18.
Omery, A.
, Kasper, C. E., & Page, G. G. (Eds.). (1995). In search of nursing science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Robinson, C. A. (1994). Women, families, chronic illness, and nursing interventions: From burden to balance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
20.
Robinson, C. A.
(1996). Health care relationships revisited. Journal of Family Nursing, 2(2), 152-173.
21.
Robinson, C. A.
(1998). Women, families, chronic illness, and nursing interventions: From burden to balance. Journal of Family Nursing, 4(3), 271-290.
22.
Tapp, D. M. (1997). Exploring therapeutic conversations between nurses and families experiencing ischemic heart disease. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
23.
Tapp, D. M.
, & Wright, L. W. (1996). Live supervision and family systems nursing: Post-modern influences and dilemmas. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 3(4), 225-233.
24.
Tapp, D. M.
, Moules, N. J., Bell, J. M., & Wright, L. M. (1997). Family skills labs: Facilitating the development of family nursing skills in the undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Family Nursing, 3(3), 247-266.
25.
Thorne, S. E.
, & Hayes, V. E. (Eds.). (1997). Nursing praxis: Knowledge and action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Tomm, K.
(1988). Interventive interviewing: Part III. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic, or reflexive questions?Family Process, 27, 1-15.
27.
White, M.
(1997). The culture of professional disciplines. In Narratives of therapists’ lives (pp. 11-21). Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.
28.
Wright, L. M.
, & Leahey, M. (1994). Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
29.
Wright, L. M.
, Watson, W. L., & Bell, J. M. (1990). The Family Nursing Unit: A unique integration of research, education and clinical practice. In J. M. Bell, W. L. Watson, & L. M. Wright (Eds.), The cutting edge of family nursing. Calgary, Canada: Family Nursing Unit Publications.
30.
(Selected papers from the First International Family Nursing Conference.)
31.
Wright, L. M.
, Watson, W. L., & Bell, J. M. (1996). Beliefs: The heart of healing in families and illness. New York: Basic Books.
