When results of descriptive functional behavior assessments are unclear, hypothesis testing can help school teams understand how the classroom environment affects a student’s challenging behavior. This article describes two hypothesis testing strategies that can be used in classroom settings: structural analysis and functional analysis. For each strategy, we (a) review relevant examples from the literature, (b) identify advantages and disadvantages, and (c) offer recommendations for when and how to use them.
DoggettR. A.EdwardsR. P.MooreJ. W.TingstromD. H.WilczynskiS. M. (2001). An approach to functional assessment in general education classroom settings. School Psychology Review, 30, 313–328.
2.
GageN. A.LewisT. J. (2010). Structural analysis in the classroom. Beyond Behavior, 19, 3–11.
3.
HanleyG. P. (2012). Functional analysis of problem behavior: Dispelling myths, overcoming implementation obstacles, and developing new lore. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 54–72.
4.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C., § 1400 et seq.
5.
IwataB. A.DorseyM. F.SliferK. J.BaumanK. E.RichmanG. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209.
6.
KernL.O’NeillR. E.StarostaK. (2005). Gathering functional assessment information. In BambaraL. M.KernL. (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 129–164). New York, NY: Guilford.
7.
LloydB. P.WeaverE. S.StaubitzJ. L. (2016). A review of functional analysis methods conducted in public school classroom settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 324–356. doi:10.1007/s10864-015-9243-y
8.
LomanS. L.HornerR. H. (2014). Examining the efficacy of a basic functional behavioral assessment training package for school personnel. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 18–30.
9.
LosinskiM.MaagJ. W.KatsiyannisA.EnnisR. P. (2014). Examining the effects and quality of interventions based on the assessment of contextual variables: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 80, 407–422.
10.
McIntoshK.BrownJ. A.BorgmeierC. J. (2008). Validity of functional behavior assessment within a response to intervention framework: Evidence, recommended practice, and future directions. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 6–14.
11.
RobertsM. L.MarshallJ.NelsonJ. R.AlbersC. A. (2001). Curriculum-based assessment procedures embedded within functional behavioral assessments: Identifying escape-motivated behaviors in a general education classroom. School Psychology Review, 30, 246–277.
12.
SarnoJ. M.SterlingH. E.MuellerM. M.DufreneB.TingstromD. H.OlmiD. J. (2011). Escape-to-attention as a potential variable for maintaining problem behavior in the school setting. School Psychology Review, 40, 57–71.
13.
StahrB.CushingD.LaneK.FoxJ. (2006). Efficacy of a function-based intervention in decreasing off-task behavior exhibited by a student with ADHD. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 201–211.
14.
StichterJ. P.ConroyM. A. (2005). Using structural analysis in natural settings: A responsive functional assessment strategy. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 19–34.
15.
SugaiG.HornerR. H.DunlapG.HienemanM.LewisT. J.NelsonC. M.. . . RuefM. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavior assessment in school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 131–143.
16.
TrusselR. P.LewisT. J.StichterJ. P. (2008). The impact of targeted classroom interventions and function-based behavior interventions on problem behavior of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 33, 153–166.
17.
UmbreitJ. (1995). Functional assessment and intervention in a regular classroom setting for the disruptive behavior of a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 267–278.
18.
UmbreitJ.FerroJ.LiaupsinC.LaneK. (2007). Functional behavioral assessment and function-based interventions: An effective, practical approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
UmbreitJ.LaneK. L.DejudC. (2004). Improving classroom behavior by modifying task difficulty: Effects of increasing the difficulty of too-easy tasks. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 13–20.
