Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background: To compare the cholesterol-lowering potency of fluvastatin and lovastatin, a randomized, prospective. open-label parallel study was conducted in patients eligible for drug therapy by National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. The study was conducted at eight centers in the United States.

Methods and Results: Patients were required to follow a cholesterol-lowering diet and were withdrawn from all lipid-lowering agents for 4 weeks prior to study entry. Patients were randomized to receive lovastatin 20 mg or fluvastatin 20 mg daily for 6 weeks. The two treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics. Baseline lipid levels in the two groups were comparable. Lovastatin was significantly more effective than fluvastatin in lowering total cholesterol (-19.5% vs-12.8%, P <.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-27.6% vs-18.2%. P <.001). Changes in high-density lipoprotein and triglyceride levels were comparable in the two groups. The differences in cholesterol lowering were similar in the three strata of coronary heart disease risk factor status as defined by the second NCEP Adult Treatment Panel. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusions: Treatment of patients with combined hyperlipidemia and/or low high-density lipoprotein with combination low-dose simvastatin and niacin resulted in large reductions in total, low-density lipoprotein, and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increases in HDL cholesterol. Although the combination was well tolerated in the current trial, its safety needs to be evaluated in larger trials of longer duration.

Keywords

low-density lipoproteins high-density lipoproteins risk strata.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Cholesterol Education Program, Second Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, Publication No. 93-3095, 1993

Hlingworth DR , Tobert JA . A review of clinical trials comparing HMG CoA reductase inhibitors. Clin Therapeut 16:366, 1994

Friedewald WT , Levy RI , Frederickson DS . Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18:499, 1972

Oster G. Borok GM , Mensin J. et al. A randomized trial to assess effectiveness and cost in clinical practice: Rationale and design of the cholesterol-reduction intervention study (CRIS). Controlled Clinical Trials 16:3, 1995

Hunninghake DB , Stein EA , Dujovne CA , et al. The efficacy of intensive dietary therapy alone or combined with lovastatin in outpatients with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med 328:1213, 1993

Bradford RH , Shear CL , Chremos AN , et al. Expanded clinical evaluation of lovastatin (EXCEL) study results: III. Efficacy in modifying lipoproteins and implications for managing patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia. Am J Med 91:18S, 1991

Desylperc JP . The role of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors in the treatment of hypcrlipidemia: A review of fluvastatin. Current Ther 56:111, 1995

Betteridge DJ , Durrington PN , Fairhurst GJ , et al. Comparison of lipid-lowering effects of low dose fluvastatin and conventional dose gemfibrozil in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Med 96(Suppl 6A):45, 1994

A Comparison of the Tolerability and Efficacy of Lovastatin 20 mg and Fluvastatin 20 mg in the Treatment of Primary Hypercholesterolemia

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References