Abstract
Therapy of atrial fibrillation remains difficult in many patients. There is increasing awareness that antiarrhythmic drug therapy instituted to maintain sinus rhythm after successful cardio version of atrial fibrillation may pose a substantial risk to the patient. Therefore, results of prospective randomized trials are needed to allow a more evidence-based approach to the treatment of this common arrhythmia. Two recently published studies have shown superiority of amiodarone over conventional antiarrhythmic drugs in maintaining sinus rhythm. The largest such study published today, the Canadian Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (CTAF), has randomized 403 patients to amiodarone or to sotalol or propafenone. At the end of the observation period, amiodarone-treated patients were significantly more likely to remain in sinus rhythm than conventionally treated patients. A number of new antiarrhythmic drugs, mainly class III substances, are currently developed for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Ibutilide has recently been released for intravenous administration, attempting pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. It has been evaluated in a number of prospective trials, which showed a higher conversion rate in patients with atrial flutter. Dofetilide is another new compound developed mainly for maintenance of sinus rhythm after restoration of sinus rhythm. It has been evaluated in two prospective, random ized, placebo-controlled trials; moreover, analysis of the DIAMOND trials showed effec tiveness of dofetilide in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with depressed left ventricular function without increased mortality when compared with placebo. Finally, several ongoing studies compare the therapeutic strategy of controlling ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation compared with the strategy of maintaining sinus rhythm. These trials will help to optimize therapy in atrial fibrillation, the most commonly encountered arrhythmia.