The brain is often considered an ensemble of clusters of independently interacting neurons. Here the brain is proposed as an isoenergetic structure having little energy barriers that limit the distribution of neuronal information, thereby facilitating unitary brain functioning. Isoenergicity is achieved and maintained by energy metabolism and must be seen as an evolutionary conserved property. Isoenergicity enables efficient coordination of neural activities, thus facilitating, among others, fast access to memory. One implication is the virtual complete dissociation of energy metabolism from higher brain functioning. Another implication is a supervening private space-time configuration that is continuously (re)constructed during life.
Anderson JR, Fincham JM, Qin Y., Stocco A.2008. A central circuit of the mind. Trends Cogn Sci12:136-43.
2.
Attwell, D., Laughlin SB2001. An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab21:1133-45.
3.
Bargh JA, Morsella E.2008. The unconscious mind. Perspect Psychol Sci3:73-9.
4.
Bohm D., Hiley BJ1993. The undivided universe. London : Routledge.
5.
Brand A., Behrend O., Marquardt T., McAlpine D., Grothe B.2002. Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond inter-aural time difference coding. Nature30:543-7.
6.
Diaz J.-L. 2000. Mind-brain unity, dual aspect, and the emergence of consciousness . Philos Psychol13:393-403.
7.
Dienel GA, Hertz L.2001. Glucose and lactate metabolism during brain activation . J Neurosci Res66:824-38.
8.
Edelman GM2004. Wider than the sky. London: Penguin. Evans WH, De Vuyst E, Leybaert L. 2006. The gap junction cellular internet: connexin limelight hemichannels enter the signaling. Biochem J397:1-14.
9.
Fries P.2009. Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. Ann Rev Neurosci32:209-24.
10.
Garcia-Rill E., Charlesworth A., Heister D., Ye M., Hayar A.2008. The developmental decrease in REM sleep: the role of transmitters and electrical coupling. Sleep31:673-90.
11.
Hodgkin Al, Huxley AF1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol (London) 117:500-44.
12.
Huinink K.2009. Slow microfiltration and slow microdialysis to versatile biomonitoring. Thesis, University of Groningen , Groningen, The Netherlands.
13.
Kim J.2005. Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
14.
Klein HC, Krop-Van Gastel W., Go KG, Korf J.1993. Prediction of specific damage or infarction from the measurement of tissue impedance following repetitive brain ischaemia in the rat. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol19:57-65.
Korf J.2006. Is brain lactate metabolized immediately after neuronal activity through the oxidative pathway? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab26:1584-6.
17.
Korf J., Gramsbergen JB2007. Timing of potential and metabolic brain energy . J Neurochem103:1697-708.
18.
Korf J., Klein HC, Venema K., Postema F.1988. Increases in striatal and hippocampal impedance and extracellular levels of amino acids by cardiac arrest in freely moving rats. J Neurochem50:1087-96.
19.
Kouider S., Dehaene S.2007. Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking. Phil Trans R Soc B362:857-75.
20.
Leznik E.Llinás R.2005. Role of gap junctions in synchronized neuronal oscillations in the inferior olive. Neurophysiology94:2447-56.
21.
Libet B.2006. Reflections on the interaction of the mind and brain. Prog Neurobiol78:322-6.
22.
Macgregor RJ2006. Quantum mechanics and brain uncertainty. J Integr Neurosci5:373-80.
23.
Mangia S., Giove F., Tkác I., Logothetis NK, Henry PG, Olman CA, and others. 2009. Metabolic and hemodynamic events after changes in neuronal activity: current hypotheses, theoretical predictions and in vivo NMR experimental findings. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab29:441-63.
24.
McAlpine D., Grothe B.2003. Sound localization and delay lines-do mammals fit the model? Trends Neurosci26: 347-50.
25.
Nagel E.1961. The structure of science: problems in the logic of scientific explanation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
26.
Saalmann YB, Pigarev IN, Vidyasagar TR2007. Neural mechanisms of visual attention: how top-down feedback highlights relevant locations. Science316:1612-5.
27.
Schwartz JM, Stapp HP, Beauregard M.2005. Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind-brain interaction. Phil Trans R Soc B360:1309-27.
28.
Sirotin YB, Das A.2009. Anticipatory hemodynamic signals in sensory cortex not predicted by local neuronal activity. Nature457:475-80.
29.
Smith CUM.2006. The ‘hard problem’ and the quantum physicists: Part 1. The first generation. Brain Cogn61:181-8.
30.
Smith CUM.2009. The ‘hard problem’ and the quantum physicists: Part 2. Modern times. Brain Cogn71:54-63.
31.
Srinivasan R., Winter WR, Nunez PL2006. Source analysis of EEG oscillations using high-resolution EEG and MEG. Prog Brain Res159:29-42.
32.
Srinivasan R., Winter WR, Ding J., Nunez PL2007. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics. J Neurosci Methods166:41-52.
33.
Thompson E., Varela FJ2001. Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness . Trends Cogn Sci5:418-425.
34.
Turennout M., Hagoort P., Brown CM1998. Brain activity during speaking: from syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. Science280:572-4.
35.
Vimal RLP.2008. Proto-experiences and subjective experiences: classical and quantum concepts. J Integrative Neurosci7:49-73.
36.
Womelsdorf T., Schoffelen JM, Oostenveld R., Singer W., Desimone R., Engel AK, and others.2007. Modulation of neuronal interactions through neuronal synchronization. Science316:1609-12.
