Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Vaccine hesitancy among young Chinese remains a challenge, contributing to low vaccination rates for the nonavalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. This study evaluated the knowledge and acceptance of this vaccine among students at a southern Chinese university and identified factors influencing these outcomes.

Methods

This cross-sectional, anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted from April to November 2023 at a multi-campus university in southern China. The questionnaire was comprised of three sections: the first collected demographic data; the second evaluated students’ knowledge of the nonavalent HPV vaccine on a scale from 0 to 15, with cut-off points at 5 and 10 delineating low, medium, and high knowledge levels, respectively; the third section assessed vaccine acceptance on a scale from 8 to 40, using scores above the 50th percentile as the benchmark for positive acceptance.

Results

Among the participants, 18% demonstrated low-level, 40.20% medium-level, and 41.70% high-level knowledge of the nonavalent HPV vaccine. Notably, 71.95% of respondents showed positive acceptance, whereas 28.05% expressed negative acceptance. Male students and those with lower economic conditions (monthly living expenses below 1000 RMB, P = 0.004; 1000-1499 RMB, P = 0.012) exhibited lower knowledge levels. As for acceptance, female students and those with higher monthly living expenses (1000-1499 RMB, P = 0.007; 1500-1999 RMB, P = 0.002; over 2000 RMB, P = 0.002) demonstrated greater vaccine acceptance. A positive correlation was noted between the level of knowledge and vaccine acceptance (r_s = 0.256, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Gender and economic status are significantly associated with nonavalent HPV vaccine knowledge and acceptance among university students. These findings highlight the potential impact of targeted educational initiatives, especially for economically disadvantaged male students, in enhancing vaccine uptake rates.

Plain Language Summary

Many young people in China are hesitant to get the nine - valent HPV vaccine, which protects against certain types of viruses that can cause cancer. This study looked at how much students at a university in southern China know about the nine - valent HPV vaccine and whether they are willing to get vaccinated. We asked students to fill out a survey between April and November 2023 to gather this information. The survey showed that knowledge about this vaccine varied: about 18% of the students knew very little, 40% had a moderate understanding, and roughly 42% knew a lot about this vaccine. Interestingly, more than 70% of the students were open to getting the vaccine, but about 28% were not. We found that male students and those with less money generally knew less about the vaccine and were more likely to not accept it. There was also a clear link between how much students knew about the vaccine and their willingness to get vaccinated. This suggests that teaching students more about this vaccine, especially boys and those from poorer backgrounds, could encourage more of them to get vaccinated. This is important because increasing vaccine rates can help prevent diseases spread by the virus.

Keywords

university students nonavalent HPV vaccine knowledge acceptance HPV attitude

Introduction

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a prevalent sexually transmitted pathogen comprising covalently closed double-stranded circular DNA viruses that specifically target human skin and mucosal tissues. Researchers have identified over 100 HPV subtypes, categorized into low-risk (eg, HPV6, 11, 40) and high-risk (eg, HPV16, 18, 31, 33) subtypes.¹ It has been reported that more than 85% of genital wart cases are associated with low-risk subtypes, particularly HPV6 and 11.² Additionally, these subtypes are implicated in the development of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.³ Infection with high-risk HPV strains can lead to malignant tumors in the reproductive system, including cervical, penile, and anal cancer, with cervical cancer being the most prevalent.^4,5 Epidemiological data from 2020 indicate that cervical cancer was one of the top ten high-risk malignancies in China’s cancer incidence spectrum.⁶ A modeling study revealed that the lifetime cost of treating various stages of HPV-related cancers in China exceeds USD 17,000.⁷ Beyond the economic impact, HPV infection imposes significant physical and psychological burdens on those affected. Given that sexual contact is the primary transmission route for HPV, its societal impact is profound.^8,9 Consequently, the prevention of HPV infection is of paramount importance.

The successful development and marketing of the HPV vaccine have introduced effective measures for the prevention of HPV infections, positioning cervical cancer as the only malignant tumor predominantly preventable through vaccination.¹⁰ Globally, six types of HPV vaccines are available, comprising three bivalent, two quadrivalent, and one nonavalent vaccine.^2,11 The World Health Organization deems vaccination of girls aged 9-14 as the most cost-effective public health strategy for the prevention of cervical cancer.¹² Moreover, substantial evidence supports the protective benefits of vaccinating adolescent girls and young women between 15 and 26 years against precancerous cervical lesions.¹³ In 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the nonavalent HPV vaccine, targeting not only young women but also young men to prevent genital cancers, precancerous lesions, developmental abnormalities, and genital warts.^14,15 Subsequently, on April 28, 2018, this vaccine received approval from the China Food and Drug Administration and was introduced to the market in mainland China, with a recommendation for its use in women aged 16-26.^16,17

Research demonstrates that 5-8 years post-vaccination, infection rates for HPV types 16 and 18 have decreased significantly—by 83% among females aged 13-19 and by 66% among those aged 20-24.¹⁸ The HPV vaccine effectively prevents infections of HPV-6, 11, 16, and 18 and associated external genital lesions in males aged 16 to 26.¹⁹ Prompt vaccination within these age groups can facilitate the early eradication of reproductive cancers and precancerous lesions. Despite regional variations, vaccination rates among young men and women in China are predominantly low.²⁰ Studies reveal a hesitancy rate of 37.57% towards HPV vaccination among female university students,²¹ with even more pronounced reluctance observed among males.^20,22 Vaccine adoption is influenced by a multitude of factors including vaccine knowledge, acceptance, availability, and cost.^20,23 Increasing awareness of HPV and its vaccine has been shown to significantly reduce vaccination hesitancy and enhance its widespread acceptance.^24,25 In this context, we conducted a cross-sectional study at a comprehensive university in southern China, spanning three campuses, to explore the knowledge and acceptance of the nonavalent HPV vaccine among university students and to analyze influencing factors. Our findings may offer practical intervention strategies to improve vaccination rates among targeted age groups.

Methods

Study Design

This study rigorously adheres to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.²⁶ Between April and November 2023, a cross-sectional survey was conducted at a comprehensive university in southern China comprising three campuses: Xianxi, Jiangwan, and Hebin. The Xianxi campus offers engineering, science, agriculture, medicine, literature, and education, while the Jiangwan campus includes science, engineering, arts, management, economics, and law, both sharing similar student demographics. In contrast, Hebin primarily focuses on medical disciplines with a smaller student body.

Recruitment utilized convenience and snowball sampling methods across campuses, with the distribution of emails, links, and QR codes via educational and social media platforms including email, WeChat, QQ, and Xuexitong. This strategy facilitated the dissemination of the informed consent and questionnaire. Participation was contingent upon agreement to the informed consent; those who did not agree were excluded, thus affirming the voluntary nature of the study. The survey was conducted anonymously, ensuring all participant details were de-identified to maintain confidentiality. The online questionnaire mandated responses to all questions, eliminating incomplete submissions and limiting entries to one per device or IP address to prevent duplicate responses. It explicitly stated that there were no right or wrong answers, encouraging participants to answer truthfully.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The study’s inclusion criteria were: (1) undergraduate status at one of the campuses, (2) awareness of personal health, (3) voluntary participation with informed consent, and (4) capability to understand and accurately complete the questionnaire. Exclusion criteria were: (1) participation under two minutes, (2) uniform responses across all questions, and (3) birthdates outside the typical college age range, such as being identical to the questionnaire completion date. Based on these criteria, 410 participants were ultimately included in the study, which received approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Foshan University (approval number FUME2023017).

Sample Size

We utilized Power Analysis and Sample Size software, version 15.0, to estimate the necessary sample size. Literature review and pilot study findings indicated that awareness of the nonavalent HPV vaccine among university students was 60%, with an acceptance rate of approximately 70%.^27,28 For precise analysis of the factors affecting vaccine awareness and acceptance, and with a tolerance of δ = 0.05 and a confidence level of 95% (1 – α), the estimated required sample sizes were 363 and 318 participants, respectively. Opting for the larger estimate and accounting for a 10% dropout rate, we set the required sample size at 400.

Data Collection

Informed by previous studies’ questionnaires and expert advice,^29-31 we developed and validated a questionnaire, achieving a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.897 to collect data. The questionnaire comprises three sections: the first gathers demographic data, including gender, age, major, ethnicity, academic level, monthly living expenses, and family location. The second section, consisting of 15 questions, evaluates students’ knowledge about the nonavalent HPV vaccine, with scoring options of correct (1 point), uncertain (0 points), and incorrect (0 points); scores range from 0-5 for low knowledge, 6-10 for moderate, and 11-15 for high knowledge. The third section, with eight questions, measures acceptance of the vaccine, using a 5-point Likert scale (1 for strongly disagree to 5 for strongly agree) to assess attitudes toward HPV prevention, control, vaccine promotion, and vaccination itself. Scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores denoting greater acceptance. Scores above the 50th percentile (P₅₀) indicate positive acceptance, while those below signify negative acceptance.

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using International Business Machines Corporation Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) version 23.0. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages were used to summarize participants’ demographics, academic level, and levels of knowledge and acceptance. Symmetrically distributed data were described using means and standard deviations (M ± SD), while skewed data were described using medians and interquartile ranges [M (P₂₅, P₇₅)]. The Wald chi-square test was employed to explore differences in knowledge and acceptance levels across various participant characteristics.

To control for confounding factors, multifactorial regression analysis was employed to separately investigate the influencing factors of knowledge and acceptance. Multivariate analysis involved ordered logistic regression for knowledge levels (low, medium, high), validated using a test for parallel lines, and binary logistic regression for acceptance levels (positive, negative), adjusted by stepwise regression and assessed for fit with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Spearman’s correlation was utilized to examine the relationship between knowledge and acceptance. All statistical tests were two-sided, with a significance threshold set at P < 0.05.

Ethical Statement

This study received approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Foshan University on January 6, 2023 (approval number: FUME2023017), situated at 33 Guangyun Road, Shishan Town, Nanhai District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, China. It adhered to principles of informed consent, anonymity, and confidentiality. Participants reviewed the informed consent document detailing the study’s nature, potential risks, benefits, and the rights to refuse or withdraw at any time during survey participation. Survey participation commenced only after obtaining consent; otherwise, participation was terminated.

Results

Demographic Characteristics

Of the 523 university students who consented to participate in the survey, 410 provided valid questionnaires after excluding 93 for completing the survey in under two minutes and 20 for submitting evidently incorrect birthdates, achieving a validity rate of 78.40%. The average age of these university students are 20.68 ± 1.56 years. Furthermore, 96.10% of the participants were aware of the nonavalent HPV vaccine.

Knowledge of the Nonavalent HPV Vaccine and Influencing Factors

The knowledge scores regarding the nonavalent HPV vaccine were 10.0 (7.0, 12.0). Specifically, 74 participants (18.0%) exhibited low knowledge levels, 165 (40.2%) demonstrated medium levels, and 171 (41.7%) showed high knowledge levels (refer to Table 1). Concerning specific questions, 23.73% of college students did not believe that “both men and women can be vaccinated with the nonavalent HPV vaccine,” 25.42% thought that “the nonavalent HPV vaccine should be administered before the first sexual encounter,” and 40.92% were unsure whether “the nonavalent HPV vaccine can prevent colorectal cancer.”

Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in vaccine knowledge based on gender (χ² = 31.067, P < 0.001), age (χ² = 25.597, P < 0.001), and monthly living expenses (χ² = 25.586, P < 0.001). No significant differences were found across major, age, ethnicity, academic level, or family location (Table 1).

Table 1.

Differences in Knowledge and Acceptance According to Demographic Characteristics (N = 410).

		Knowledge, n (%)					Acceptance, n (%)
Variables	Number	Low	Moderate	High	χ²	P	Positive	Negative	χ²	P
Gender					31.067	<0.001*			40.799	<0.001*
Male	100 (24.4)	33 (33.0)	46 (46.0)	21 (21.0)			47 (47.0)	53 (53.0)
Female	310 (75.6)	41 (13.2)	119 (38.4)	150 (48.4)			248 (80.0)	62 (20.0)
Major					3.235	0.198			0.326	0.568
Medicine	97 (23.7)	16 (16.5)	33 (34.0)	48 (49.5)			72 (74.2)	25 (25.8)
Non-medicine	313 (76.3)	58 (18.5)	132 (42.2)	123 (39.3)			223 (71.3)	90 (28.7)
Age (years)					25.597	<0.001*			4.612	0.202
<18	7 (1.7)	6 (85.7)	1 (14.3)	0 (0.0)			3 (42.9)	4 (57.1)
18-22	379 (92.4)	61 (16.1)	154 (40.6)	164 (43.3)			277 (73.1)	102 (26.9)
23-26	20 (4.9)	6 (30.0)	8 (40.0)	6 (30.0)			13 (65.0)	7 (35.0)
>26	4 (1.0)	1 (25.0)	2 (50.0)	1 (25.0)			2 (50.0)	2 (50.0)
Ethnicity					4.388	0.111			0.084	0.772
Han Chinese	404 (98.5)	71 (17.6)	164 (40.6)	169 (41.8)			291 (72.0)	113 (28.0)
Ethnic minority	6 (1.5)	3 (50.0)	1 (16.7)	2 (33.3)			4 (66.7)	2 (33.3)
Academic level					5.499	0.240			0.309	0.857
Junior college	31 (7.6)	10 (32.3)	12 (38.7)	9 (29.0)			21 (67.7)	10 (32.3)
Undergraduate	375 (91.5)	63 (16.8)	152 (40.5)	160 (42.7)			271 (72.3)	104 (27.7)
Postgraduate	4 (0.9)	1 (25.0)	1 (25.0)	2 (50.0)			3 (75.0)	1 (25.0)
Living expenses (RMB/month)					25.586	<0.001*			10.969	0.012*
<1000	35 (8.5)	15 (42.9)	7 (20.0)	13 (37.1)			17 (48.6)	18(51.4)
1000-1499	204 (49.8)	31 (15.2)	98 (48.0)	75 (36.8)			148 (72.5)	56 (27.5)
1500-1999	111 (27.1)	21 (18.9)	38 (34.2)	52 (46.9)			85 (76.6)	26 (23.4)
>2000	60 (14.6)	7 (11.7)	22 (36.6)	31 (51.7)			45 (75.0)	15 (25.0)
Family location					3.780	0.706			0.477	0.924
Urban	198 (48.3)	38 (19.2)	79 (39.9)	81 (40.9)			143 (72.2)	55 (27.8)
County seat	62 (15.1)	12 (19.4)	22 (35.4)	28 (45.2)			46 (74.2)	16 (25.8)
Township	54 (13.2)	9 (16.7)	27 (50.0)	18 (33.3)			37 (68.5)	17 (31.5)
Rural	96 (23.4)	15 (15.6)	37 (38.6)	44 (45.8)			69 (71.9)	27 (28.1)

Note. 1 renminbi (RMB) = 0.138 United States dollar (USD).

^*P < 0.05.

Ordered logistic regression identified gender and monthly living expenses as significant predictors of knowledge levels. Male students had lower knowledge compared to females (odds ratio [OR] = 0.258, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.164-0.405). Those with monthly expenses below 1000 RMB (OR = 0.297, 95% CI: 0.130-0.679) and between 1000-1499 RMB (OR = 0.474, 95% CI: 0.266-0.847) also scored lower on knowledge (Table 2). The parallel line test (χ² = 12.659, P = 0.081) confirmed the model’s assumptions and its predictive accuracy.

Table 2.

Ordered Logistic Regression Analysis of Knowledge About Nonavalent HPV Vaccine.

Variables	B	SE	Wald χ²	P	OR (95%CI)
Gender
Male	−1.356	0.230	34.631	<0.001*	0.258 (0.164-0.405)
Female^a
Age (years)
<18	−2.548	1.460	3.046	0.081	0.078 (0.004-1.368)
18-22	0.779	0.955	0.664	0.415	2.179 (0.335-14.168)
23-26	0.127	1.038	0.015	0.903	1.135 (0.149-8.671)
>26^a
Living expenses (RMB/month)
<1000	−1.215	0.422	8.281	0.004*	0.297 (0.130-0.679)
1000-1499	−0.746	0.296	6.362	0.012*	0.474 (0.266-0.847)
1500-1999	−0.568	0.320	3.140	0.076	0.567 (0.302-1.062)
≥2000^a

Abbreviations: SE: standard error; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

*P < 0.05.

^aReference group.

Acceptance of the Nonavalent HPV Vaccine and Influencing Factors

The acceptance score for the nonavalent HPV vaccine among university students was 32.0 (31.0, 38.0). Median scores for attitudes towards prevention and control were 16, for vaccine promotion were 12, and for vaccination were 4. Scores below the median of 32.0 indicated negative attitudes, whereas scores above indicated positive attitudes. Accordingly, 295 participants (71.95%) displayed positive attitudes, and 115 participants (28.05%) had negative attitudes.

Significant statistical differences in vaccine acceptance were found based on gender (χ² = 40.799, P < 0.001) and monthly living expenses (χ² = 10.969, P = 0.012), with no significant differences for other characteristics (see Table 1).

Binary logistic regression analysis showed that gender and monthly living expenses significantly influenced acceptance. Female students were more likely to exhibit a positive attitude towards the vaccine (OR = 4.945, 95% CI: 2.994-8.166). Students with monthly expenses between 1000-1499 RMB (OR = 2.911, 95% CI: 1.345-6.229), 1500-1999 RMB (OR = 0.474, 95% CI: 0.266-0.847), and over 2000 RMB (OR = 4.673, 95% CI: 1.802-12.119) demonstrated more positive attitudes compared to those spending less than 1000 RMB. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed a satisfactory model fit (χ² = 0.607, df = 4, P = 0.962) (see Table 3).

Table 3.

Binary Logistic Regression Analysis of Participants’ Acceptance of Nonavalent HPV Vaccine.

Variables	B	SE	Wald χ2	p	OR (95%CI)
Gender
Male^a
Female	1.598	0.256	39.003	<0.001^*	4.945 (2.994-8.166)
Living expenses (RMB/month)
<1000^a
1000-1499	1.068	0.394	7.357	0.007^*	2.911 (1.345-6.229)
1500-2000	1.335	0.430	9.648	0.002^*	3.799 (1.636-8.819)
≥2000	1.542	0.486	10.052	0.002^*	4.673 (1.802-12.119)

Abbreviations: SE: standard error; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

*P < 0.05.

^aReference group.

Correlation Between Participants’ Knowledge Level of the Nonavalent HPV Vaccine and Their Acceptance

Spearman correlation analysis indicated a significant positive correlation between the participants’ knowledge level of the nonavalent HPV vaccine and their acceptance (r_s = 0.256, P < 0.001), with positive correlations across all dimensions of acceptance (P < 0.001), as detailed in Table 4.

Table 4.

Correlation Between Knowledge and Acceptance.

Knowledge	Acceptance	P
Knowledge	r_s	P
Overall	0.256	<0.001
Prevention and control attitude	0.238	<0.001
Promotion attitude	0.253	<0.001
Vaccination attitude	0.256	<0.001

Discussion

In response to vaccine hesitancy among young adults in China and generally low vaccination rates, we conducted a cross-sectional study on three campuses of a southern Chinese university. This study assessed university students’ knowledge and acceptance of the nonavalent HPV vaccine and explored influential factors. Our findings offer actionable insights to enhance vaccination efforts within targeted age groups.

The study revealed that while 96.10% of participants were aware of the 9-valent HPV vaccine, and more than half held a positive attitude towards it, their overall knowledge remained limited, mirroring findings from previous research.³² There were prevalent misconceptions among the participants about the vaccine, especially regarding the target groups for vaccination, appropriate conditions for receiving the vaccine (eg, whether one has engaged in sexual activity or has children), and the vaccine’s impact on HPV infection rates. Specifically, 23.73% of the participants incorrectly believed that not all men and women are eligible for the 9-valent HPV vaccine, 25.42% erroneously thought it should be administered before one’s first sexual encounter, and 40.92% were uncertain about the vaccine’s efficacy in preventing other types of cancer, such as colorectal cancer. These findings underscore the urgent need to enhance health education among college students to correct these misconceptions.

The study highlighted gender as a significant predictor of knowledge and acceptance of the nonavalent HPV vaccine. Male students demonstrated lower awareness compared to females, consistent with findings from previous research.^33-35 This gender disparity may be attributed to perceived risk differences; diseases caused by HPV are often perceived as more prevalent among women, thus generating higher demand for vaccination among females. However, HPV does not exhibit gender-specific susceptibility but does show site-specific susceptibility.^36,37 A Brazilian meta-analysis showed the highest HPV incidence rates at anatomic sites such as the penis, cervix, and anus, followed by the oral cavity.³⁷ Frequent gynecological exams in women, combined with heightened sensitivity to changes in reproductive organs, likely contribute to higher detection rates of HPV in women. This has fostered a misconception that women are more vulnerable to HPV, thereby marginalizing the relevance of vaccination for men.³⁴ Our findings also indicate that gender not only affects knowledge but also acceptance of the vaccine. Logistic regression showed that female students had a more favorable attitude towards the vaccine, mirroring a report from Italy.³⁸ These attitudes likely reflect the higher perceived threat of HPV among women, fostering greater trust in the vaccine’s benefits, particularly concerning its safety and effectiveness, and potentially strengthening their health beliefs and reducing hesitancy to vaccinate.³⁹ Future efforts to promote vaccination behavior in the target age group should focus on male students.

This survey evaluated the influence of economic factors on university students’ knowledge and acceptance of vaccines. Recognizing that students' monthly living expenses more accurately reflect their disposable income—and that such expenses often derive from sources beyond family support, including part-time employment—we used these expenses as an economic indicator. The findings revealed that higher living expenses correlate with increased vaccine knowledge and more favorable attitudes toward the nonavalent HPV vaccine. Despite the benefits, the vaccine’s exclusion from China’s national medical insurance and the high cost of a three-dose regimen—approximately 4000 RMB—render it unaffordable for many.¹⁷ Students with limited financial resources often weigh the costs against the benefits, leading to reduced engagement and overall lower vaccine literacy. Such gaps in understanding can foster vaccine hesitancy. Additionally, economic conditions reflect broader family circumstances, with most students in mainland China not fully financially independent and reliant on parental support. Typically, higher parental education levels correlate with greater family income,⁴⁰ which can broaden the array of viable options. Consequently, students from more educated backgrounds are likely to have a heightened health awareness. This finding suggests that interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy should particularly consider students with limited economic resources.

Our study revealed a positive correlation between university students’ knowledge of the nonavalent HPV vaccine and their acceptance of it. Similar findings were reported in studies conducted in the United States,⁴¹ Uganda,⁴² and Canada,⁴³ as well as in a meta-analysis of vaccine acceptance among Ethiopian girls.⁴⁴ It is widely accepted that sufficient and clear understanding can enhance behavioral willingness and acceptance. Previous research has indicated that school-based health education generally enhances vaccination confidence and increases vaccination coverage rates.^45-48 Consequently, implementing educational and promotional activities in schools is likely to be effective. Universities can enhance students’ understanding of HPV and its vaccines through various methods, such as peer education, health lectures featuring real case studies, distribution of health manuals within student communities, collaboration with campus health services to offer online and offline health consultations, dissemination of information about HPV and the nonavalent HPV vaccine through official university channels, and the introduction of regular HPV screening programs. These knowledge-enhancement strategies could significantly reduce vaccine hesitancy and promote vaccination behaviors among the appropriate age group.

This study has several limitations. Firstly, its cross-sectional design prevents it from establishing causal relationships between knowledge, acceptance, and other variables. Secondly, the use of convenience and snowball sampling methods, and the absence of a sampling framework tailored to the population size of the three campuses, may diminish the sample’s representativeness. Thirdly, external factors such as social media exposure and parental attitudes towards vaccination, which may influence university students’ knowledge and acceptance of the nonavalent HPV vaccine, were not considered in this study. Lastly, it was not possible to control for participants' behavior during the survey, such as online searching for answers, and there may be a bias towards socially desirable responses among medical students, despite instructions to provide honest answers.

Despite its limitations, this study offers valuable insights into college students’ knowledge and acceptance of the nonavalent HPV vaccine, as well as the diverse factors influencing these aspects. The research targeted a varied group of students across different majors, academic years, and family backgrounds, suggesting that the findings may be applicable to comprehensive universities at large. Focusing on pertinent factors through school health interventions, particularly for economically disadvantaged males, is likely to enhance vaccination rates among young people.

Conclusion

In summary, this study examined the knowledge and acceptance of the nonavalent HPV vaccine among university students at a comprehensive university in southern China, focusing on associated factors. Results revealed that while a large percentage of participants were aware of HPV, their comprehensive knowledge about the vaccine was lacking. Both gender and economic status were significantly associated with the students’ knowledge and acceptance of the vaccine, with a positive correlation noted between knowledge and acceptance. These findings underscore the necessity for further research and the development of targeted educational interventions for specific demographics, such as male and economically disadvantaged students, to enhance vaccination rates within these key groups.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

We extend our sincere gratitude to the participants who consented to partake in this research survey.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship at Foshan University (No. 2022-18-133) and the 2023 Teaching Reform Project of Guangdong Provincial “New Medical Science” (No. 2023-0724-204).

Ethical Statement

ORCID iD

Peiwan Fang

Data Availability Statement

The original research data can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.*

Appendix

References

Wong

Fuller

Pabbaraju

Wong

Zahariadis

. Comparison of the hybrid capture 2 and cobas 4800 tests for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in specimens collected in PreservCyt medium. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(1):25-29. doi:10.1128/jcm.05400-11

Lukács

Máté

Farkas

, et al. The quadrivalent HPV vaccine is protective against genital warts: a meta-analysis. BMC Publ Health. 2020;20(1):691. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08753-y

Smahelova

Hamsikova

Ludvikova

, et al. Outcomes after human papillomavirus vaccination in patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;148(7):654-661. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1190

Jensen

Becker

Jackson

Rysavy

. Human papillomavirus and associated cancers: a review. Viruses. 2024;16(5):680. doi:10.3390/v16050680

Szymonowicz

Chen

. Biological and clinical aspects of HPV-related cancers. Cancer Biol Med. 2020;17(4):864-878. doi:10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0370

Sung

Ferlay

Siegel

, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660

Ding

, et al. The lifetime cost estimation of human papillomavirus-related diseases in China: a modeling study. J Transl Int Med. 2021;9(3):200-211. doi:10.2478/jtim-2021-0039

Malagón

Louvanto

Wissing

, et al. Hand-to-genital and genital-to-genital transmission of human papillomaviruses between male and female sexual partners (HITCH): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(3):317-326. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30655-8

Gazzetta

Valent

Sala

Driul

Brunelli

. Sexually transmitted infections and the HPV-related burden: evolution of Italian epidemiology and policy. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1336250. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1336250

10.

Kind

Pavelyev

Kothari

, et al. Assessing the epidemiological impact on cervical cancer of switching from 4-valent to 9-valent HPV vaccine within a gender-neutral vaccination programme in Switzerland. BMC Publ Health. 2020;20(1):671. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08840-0

11.

Pils

Joura

. From the monovalent to the nine-valent HPV vaccine. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(9):827-833. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.05.001

12.

Human papillomavirus vaccines: WHO position paper, October 2014. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2014;89(43):465-491.

13.

Arbyn

Simoens

Martin-Hirsch

. Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD009069.

14.

Shimabukuro

Marquez

Mba-Jonas

Arana

Cano

. Safety of the 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine. Pediatrics. 2019;144(6):e20191791.

15.

Petrosky

Bocchini

Jr Hariri

, et al. Use of 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: updated HPV vaccination recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(11):300-304.

16.

Xie

Zhu

Jiang

Yin

. Awareness of HPV and HPV vaccines, acceptance to vaccination and its influence factors among parents of adolescents 9 to 18 years of age in China: a cross-sectional study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2023;71:73-78. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2023.03.007

17.

Qin

Qiu

, et al. The effectiveness of pay-it-forward in addressing HPV vaccine delay and increasing uptake among 15-18-year-old adolescent girls compared to user-paid vaccination: a study protocol for a two-arm randomized controlled trial in China. BMC Publ Health. 2023;23(1):48. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14947-3

18.

Drolet

Bénard

Pérez

Brisson

HPV Vaccination Impact Study Group . Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;394(10197):497-509. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30298-3

19.

Giuliano

Palefsky

Goldstone

, et al. Efficacy of quadrivalent HPV vaccine against HPV Infection and disease in males. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(5):401-411. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0909537

20.

Wang

Zhong

. Current experience in HPV vaccination in China. Indian J Gynecol Oncol. 2021;19:50-55.

21.

Jiang

. Study on HPV Vaccine Hesitancy and its Influencing Factors of Female College Students in Beijing Universities. Beijing, China: Beijing Chinese Medicine University; 2020.

22.

Jia

Pan

Hong

, et al. A survey of potential acceptance of 9-valent HPV vaccine among Chinese male college students. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023;19(3):2272533. doi:10.1080/21645515.2023.2272533

23.

Zhao

X-L

S-Y

J-W

, et al. Tackling barriers to scale up human papillomavirus vaccination in China: progress and the way forward. Infect Dis Poverty. 2023;12(1):86. doi:10.1186/s40249-023-01136-6

24.

Zhang

Liu

Wang

, et al. Effect of a school-based educational intervention on HPV and HPV vaccine knowledge and willingness to be vaccinated among Chinese adolescents : a multi-center intervention follow-up study. Vaccine. 2020;38(20):3665-3670. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.03.032

25.

Oliveira

MSF

Sorpreso

ICE

Zuchelo

LTS

, et al. Knowledge and acceptability of HPV vaccine among HPV-vaccinated and unvaccinated adolescents at Western Amazon. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2020;66(8):1062-1069. doi:10.1590/1806-9282.66.8.1062

26.

von Elm

Altman

Egger

, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-1457. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61602-x

27.

Hsu

Fetzer

Hsu

Chang

Huang

Chou

. Intention to obtain human papillomavirus vaccination among taiwanese undergraduate women. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36(11):686-692. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181ad28d3

28.

Wang

. HPV vaccine knowledge and perceived risk of cervical cancer among female college students in Taiwan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(12):7371-7374. doi:10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.12.7371

29.

. Knowledge of HPV and acceptability of HPV vaccine among women in western China: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Wom Health. 2018;18(1):130. doi:10.1186/s12905-018-0619-8

30.

Klug

Hukelmann

Blettner

. Knowledge about infection with human papillomavirus: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2008;46(2):87-98. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.09.003

31.

Marlow

Zimet

McCaffery

Ostini

Waller

. Knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV vaccination: an international comparison. Vaccine. 2013;31(5):763-769. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.083

32.

Chen

AC-C

Astroth

Reifsnider

Yang

Mao

Chen

. Exploring Chinese college students’ HPV awareness, knowledge, attitudes, and intent of HPV vaccination: a qualitative study. J Cancer Educ. 2021;36:1211-1218.

33.

Liu

Tao

. Knowledge, practice and attitude towards HPV vaccination among college students in Beijing, China. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(1):116-123. doi:10.1080/21645515.2019.1638727

34.

Kim

Park

Ahn

Park

. The effects of an HPV education program by gender among Korean university students. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(4):562-567. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.014

35.

Schwendener

Kiener

Jafflin

, et al. HPV vaccine awareness, knowledge and information sources among youth in Switzerland: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e054419. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054419

36.

Branković

Verdonk

Klinge

. Applying a gender lens on human papillomavirus infection: cervical cancer screening, HPV DNA testing, and HPV vaccination. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12(1):14. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-12-14

37.

Colpani

Soares Falcetta

Bacelo Bidinotto

, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0229154. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229154

38.

Napolitano

Liguori

Angelillo

. Human papillomavirus infection and vaccination: knowledge and attitudes among young males in Italy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(6):1504-1510. doi:10.1080/21645515.2016.1156271

39.

Sun

Cao

Nyeong

Zhang

Wang

. Avoiding threats, but not acquiring benefits, explains the effect of future time perspective on promoting health behavior. Heliyon. 2023;9(9):e19842. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19842

40.

Yang

Zheng

Wang

. Education, income, and happiness: evidence from China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:855327. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.855327

41.

Navalpakam

Dany

Hajj Hussein

. Behavioral perceptions of oakland university female college students towards human papillomavirus vaccination. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155955. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155955

42.

Kisaakye

Namakula

Kihembo

Kisakye

Nsubuga

Babirye

. Level and factors associated with uptake of human papillomavirus infection vaccine among female adolescents in Lira District, Uganda. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;31:184. doi:10.11604/pamj.2018.31.184.14801

43.

Dubé

Gagnon

Clément

, et al. Challenges and opportunities of school-based HPV vaccination in Canada. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(7-8):1650-1655. doi:10.1080/21645515.2018.1564440

44.

Zewdie

Kasahun

Habtie

Gashaw

Ayele

. Human papillomavirus vaccine acceptance among adolescent girls in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Publ Health. 2023;23(1):1369. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16305-3

45.

Iova

Badau

Daina

Șuteu

Daina

. Evaluation of the knowledge and attitude of adolescents regarding the HPV infection, HPV vaccination and cervical cancer in a region from the northwest of Romania. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023;17:2249-2262. doi:10.2147/ppa.S421875

46.

Siddiqui

Kataria

Watson

Chandra-Mouli

. A systematic review of the evidence on peer education programmes for promoting the sexual and reproductive health of young people in India. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020;28(1):1741494. doi:10.1080/26410397.2020.1741494

47.

Dike

Cesario

Malecha

Nurse

. An education intervention to increase human papillomavirus vaccination confidence and acceptability: a randomized controlled trial. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2023;50(4):423-436. doi:10.1188/23.Onf.423-436

48.

Shapiro

Tatar

Amsel

, et al. Using an integrated conceptual framework to investigate parents' HPV vaccine decision for their daughters and sons. Prev Med. 2018;116:203-210. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.09.017

Factors Influencing Knowledge and Acceptance of Nonavalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Among University Population in Southern China: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Plain Language Summary

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Study Design

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Sample Size

Data Collection

Data Analysis

Ethical Statement

Results

Demographic Characteristics

Knowledge of the Nonavalent HPV Vaccine and Influencing Factors

Acceptance of the Nonavalent HPV Vaccine and Influencing Factors

Correlation Between Participants’ Knowledge Level of the Nonavalent HPV Vaccine and Their Acceptance

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

Ethical Statement

ORCID iD

Data Availability Statement

Appendix

References