Cervical cancer mortality rates are among the highest in the United States for Northern Plains Native American women compared with white and other Native American women. The aims of Messengers for Health, a community-based participatory research project based on the Apsáalooke (Crow Indian) Reservation, are to decrease cervical cancer screening barriers, improve knowledge regarding screening and prevention, and increase the proportion of women receiving Pap tests. This paper presents results from a survey assessing women's perceptions of the level of comfort and care received by health care providers in their most recent Pap test appointment.
Methods
A survey assessing patient communication and satisfaction with their health care providers was conducted with a random sample of 101 Apsáalooke women. Qualitative and quantitative methods were utilized to analyze the survey data.
Results
Women reported both positive and negative experiences with their provider regarding their Pap test appointments. They noted positive experiences when trust was established and when the provider offered information, reassured or encouraged them, was personable, was familiar or consistent, maintained confidentiality, and was a woman. The women reported negative experiences when the examination was too short, when they did not have a consistent or female provider, and when they did not feel comfortable with the provider's nonverbal communication.
Conclusions
Continued work with both providers and patients is necessary to decrease communication barriers and increase satisfaction with Pap test appointments.
References
1.
EspeyD., PaisanoR.E., CobbN.. Regional patterns and trends in cancer mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1990-2001.Cancer.2005; 103: 1045–1053.
2.
Billings Area Indian Health Service Office.Pap smear trend data2007.
3.
DignanM., MichielutteR., BlinsonK.. Effectiveness of health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among eastern-band Cherokee Indian women in North Carolina.J Natl Cancer Inst.1996; 88: 1670–1676.
4.
StricklandC.J., ChrismanN.J., YallupM.. Walking the journey of womanhood: Yakama Indian women and Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening.Public Health Nurs.1996; 13: 141–150.
5.
BurhansstipanovL.. Urban native American health issues.Cancer.2000; 88(5 suppl): 1207–1213.
6.
FrischL.L., AllenG.D., PadonuG.. Social influences on Pap smear screening frequency.Alaska Med.2000; 42: 41–47.
7.
LawrenceJ.. The Indian Health Service and the sterilization of Native American women.Am Indian Q.2000; 24: 400–419.
8.
US Commission on Civil Rights,. Broken Promises: Evaluating the Native American Health Care System.Washington, DC: US Commission on Civil Rights; 2004. http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/nahealth/nabroken.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2008.
9.
WestmorelandT.M., WatsonK.R.. Redeeming hollow promises: the case for mandatory spending on health care for American Indians and Alaska Natives.Am J Public Health.2006; 96: 600–605. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
10.
BurhansstipanovL., HollowW.. Native American cultural aspects of oncology nursing care.Semin Oncol Nurs.2001; 17: 206–219.
11.
ShiL., ForrestC.B., Von SchraderS.. Vulnerability and the patient-practitioner relationship: the roles of gatekeeping and primary care performance.Am J Public Health.2003; 93: 138–144.
12.
BeachM.C., SugarmanJ., JohnsonR.L.. Do patients treated with dignity report higher satisfaction, adherence, and receipt of preventive care?Ann Fam Med.2005; 3: 331–338.
13.
StepanikovaI., MollbornS., CookK.S.. Patients’ race, ethnicity, language, and trust in a physician.J Health Soc Behav.2006; 47: 390–405.
14.
DonohueR.K.. Nurse practitioner-client interaction as resource exchange in a women's health clinic: an exploratory study.J Clin Nurs.2003; 12: 717–725.
15.
BalkrishnanR., DuganE., CamachoF.T.. Trust and satisfaction with physicians, insurers, and the medical profession.Med Care.2003; 41: 1058–1064.
16.
KaoA.C., GreenD.C., DavisN.A.. Patients’ trust in their physicians: effects of choice, continuity, and payment method.J Gen Intern Med.1998; 13: 681–686.
JoosS.K., HickamD.H., GordonG.H.. Effects of a physician communication intervention on patient care outcomes.J Gen Intern Med.1996; 11: 147–155.
19.
Cooper-PatrickL., GalloJ.J., GonzalesJ.J.. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship.JAMA.1999; 282: 583–589.
20.
SahaS., ArbelaezJ.J., CooperL.A.. Patient-physician relationships and racial disparities in the quality of health care.Am J Public Health.2003; 93: 1713–1719.
21.
CarrasquilloO., FerryD.H., EdwardsJ.. Eligibility for government insurance if immigrant provisions of welfare reform are repealed.Am J Public Health.2003; 93: 1680–1682.
22.
DoescherM.P., SaverB.G., FranksP.. Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust.Arch Fam Med.2000; 9: 1156–1163.
SpectorR.E.. Cultural Diversity in Health & Illness.6th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2004.
25.
SanchezT.R., PlaweckiJ.A., PlaweckiH.M.. The delivery of culturally sensitive health care to Native Americans.J Holist Nurs.1996; 14: 295–307.
26.
BurhansstipanovL.. Cancer research among Native American peoples. Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Cancer Nursing Research. Atlanta, GA. American Cancer Society Pub. No. 94-25M-No. 3072. 1994.
27.
ChristopherS., McCormickA.K., SmithA.. Development of an interviewer training manual for a cervix health project on the Apsáalooke reservation.Health Promot Pract.2005; 6: 414–422.
28.
ChristopherS., BurhansstipanovL., McCormickA.K.. Using a CBPR approach to develop an interviewer training manual with members of the Apsáalooke Nation. In: IsraelB.A., EngE., SchultzA.J., eds. Methods in Community-Based Participatory Research for Health.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005: 128–145.
29.
ChristopherS.. Recommendations for conducting successful research with Native Americans.J Cancer Educ.2005; 20(1 suppl): 47–51.
30.
SmithA., ChristopherS., McCormickA.K.. Development and implementation of a culturally sensitive cervical health survey: a community-based participatory approach.Women Health.2004; 40: 67–86.
31.
DavisS.M., ReidR.. Practicing participatory research in American Indian communities.Am J Clin Nutr.1999; 69(4 suppl): 755S–759S.
32.
SobeckJ.L., ChapleskiE.E., FisherC.. Conducting research with American Indians: a case study of motives, methods, and results.J Ethnic Cult Divers Soc Work.2003; 12: 69–84.
33.
Crazy BullC.. Advice for the non-Native researcher.Tribal College J Am Indian Higher Educ.1997; 9: 24.
34.
HornerR.D., SalazarW., GeigerH.J.. Changing healthcare professionals’ behaviors to eliminate disparities in healthcare: What do we know? How might we proceed?Am J Manag Care.2004; 10: SP12–SP19.
35.
BannerR.O., DeCambraH., EnosR.. A breast and cervical cancer project in a Native Hawaiian community: Wai'anae cancer research project.Prev Med.1995; 24: 447–453.
36.
BannerR.O., GotayC.C., EnosR.. Effects of a Culturally-Tailored Intervention to Increase Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Native Hawaiians.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1999: 45–55.
37.
BellR.A., DignanM.B., MichielutteR.. Cervical cancer education for Native American women in North Carolina: the North Carolina Native American Prevention Project. In: GloverC.S., HodgeF.S., eds. Native Outreach: A Report to American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Communities: Executive Summary.Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute; NIH Pub No 98-4341. 1999: 33–44.
38.
LanierA.P., KellyJ., BernerJ.. The Alaska Native women's health project to reduce cervical cancer. In: GloverC.S., HodgeF.S., eds. Native Outreach: A Report to the American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities: Executive Summary.Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; NIH Pub No 98-4341. 1999; 23–32.
39.
MatsunagaD.S., EnosR., GotayC.C.. Participatory research in a Native Hawaiian community: the Wai'anae cancer research project.Cancer.1996; 78(7 suppl): 1582–1586.
40.
BergB.L.. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1998.
41.
PattonM.Q.. How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1987.
42.
PattonM.Q.. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.2nd ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
43.
PattonM.Q.. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods.3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
44.
BogdanR.C., BiklenS.K.. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1992.
45.
HubermanA.M., MilesM.B.. Data management and analysis methods. In: DenzinN.K., LincolnY.S., eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994: 428–445.
46.
National Native American AIDS Prevention Center,. Clinician's Guide: Working with Native Americans Living with HIV.Oakland, CA: NNAAPC; 2002. http://www.nnaapc.org. Accessed January 9, 2008.
47.
McLeroyK.R., BibeauD., StecklerA.. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs.Health Educ Q.1988; 15: 351–377.
48.
StokolsD.. Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: toward a social ecology of health promotion.Am Psychol.1992; 47: 6–22.
49.
StokolsD., AllenJ., BellinghamR.L.. The social ecology of health promotion: implications for research and practice.Am J Health Promot.1996; 10: 247–251.
