The Seventh ACCP Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines.Chest.2004; 126(3 suppl).
2.
HeitJ.A., O'FallonW.M., PettersonT.M.. Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based study.Arch Intern Med.2002; 4: 1245–1248.
3.
BlomJ.W., DoggenC.J., OsantoS.. Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis.JAMA.2005; 4: 715–722.
4.
LeeA.Y., JulianJ.A., LevineM.N.. Clinical utility of a rapid whole-blood D-dimer assay in patients with cancer who present with suspected acute deep venous thrombosis.Ann Intern Med.1999; 4: 417–423.
HeitJ.A.. Cancer and venous thromboembolism: scope of the problem.Cancer Control.2005; 4(suppl 1): 5–10.
7.
MillerG.J., BauerK.A., HowarthD.J.. Increased incidence of neoplasia of the digestive tract in men with persistent activation of the coagulant pathway.J Thromb Haemost.2004; 2: 2107–2114.
8.
SchulmanS., LindmarkerP.. Incidence of cancer after prophylaxis with warfarin against recurrent venous thromboembolism: duration of anticoagulation trial.N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1953–1958.
9.
SorensenH.T., MellemkjaerL., OlsenJ.H.. Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism.N Engl J Med.2000; 4: 1846–1850.
10.
HeitJ.A., SilversteinM.D., MohrD.N.. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study.Arch Intern Med.2000; 4: 809–815.
11.
SorensenH.T., MellemkjaerL., NielsenG.L.. Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism.N Engl J Med.2000; 4: 1846–1850.
12.
LevitanN., DowlatiA., RemickS.C.. Rates of initial and recurrent thromboembolic disease among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy. Risk analysis using Medicare claims data.Medicine.1999; 78: 285–291.
13.
LevesqueH., BeliznaC., MichelP.. Venous thromboembolic treatment in patients with cancer (in French).Rev Med Interne.2004; 4: 906–914.
14.
KakkarA.K., LevineM., PinedoH.M.. Venous thrombosis in cancer patients: insights from the FRONTLINE survey.Oncologist.2003; 4: 381–388.
15.
LeeA.Y., LevineM.N., BakerR.I.. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.N Engl J Med.2003; 4: 146–153.
16.
SallahS., WanJ.Y., NguyenN.P.. Venous thrombosis in patients with solid tumors: determination of frequency and characteristics.Thromb Haemost.2002; 4: 575–579.
17.
ThodiyilP.A., KakkarA.K.. Variation in relative risk of venous thromboembolism in different cancers.Thromb Haemost.2002; 4: 1076–1077.
18.
GeertsW.H., PineoG.F., HeitJ.A.. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. The Seventh ACCP Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.Chest.2004; 4(3 suppl): 338S–400S.
19.
BergqvistD., BurmarkU.S., FlordalP.A.. Low molecular weight heparin started before surgery as prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis: 2500 versus 5000 XaI units in 2070 patients.Br J Surg.1995; 4: 496–501.
20.
RasmussenM.S.. Does prolonged thromboprophylaxis improve outcome in patients undergoing surgery?Cancer Treat Rev.2003; 4(suppl 2): 15–17.
21.
ENOXACAN Study Group.Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in elective cancer surgery: a double-blind randomized multicentre trial with venographic assessment.Br J Surg.1997; 84: 1099–1103.
22.
AlikhanR., CohenA.T., CombeS.. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients with enoxaparin: a subgroup analysis of the MEDENOX study.Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis.2003; 4: 341–346.
23.
BauersachsR.M.. Fondaparinux: an update on new study results.Eur J Clin Invest.2005; 4(suppl 1): 27–32.
24.
BonthierJ.. The venous thrombotic risk in non-surgical patients.Drugs.1996; 4(suppl): 16–29.
25.
AlikhanR., PetersF., WilmottR.. Fatal pulmonary embolism in hospitalised patients: a necropsy review.J Clin Pathol.2004; 4: 1254–1257.
26.
MasciG., MagagnoliM., ZucaliP.A.. Minidose warfarin prophylaxis for catheter-associated thrombosis in cancer patients: can it be safely associated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy?J Clin Oncol.2003; 4: 736–739.
27.
ReichartP., KretzschmarA., BiakhovM.. A phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of daily low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin sodium, Fragmin) in preventing catheter-related complications in cancer patients with central venous catheters.Proc Annu Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol.2002; 4: 1474. Abstract.
28.
HirshJ., RaschkeR.. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin. The Seventh ACCP Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.Chest.2004; 4(3 suppl): 188S–203S.
29.
BaumM.. Current status of aromatase inhibitors in the management of breast cancer and critique of the NCIC MA-17 trial.Cancer Control.2004; 4: 217–221.
30.
BullerH.R., AgnelliG., HullR.D.. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. The Seventh ACCP Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.Chest.2004; 126(3 suppl): 401S–428S. Erratum in: Chest. 2005; 4: 416.
31.
HullR.D., PineoG.F., MahA.F.. A randomized trial evaluating longterm low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for three months versus intravenous heparin followed by warfarin sodium.Blood.2002; 4: 148a. Abstract.
32.
KakkarA.K.. Low-molecular-weight heparin and survival in patients with malignant disease.Cancer Control.2005; 4(suppl 1): 22–30.