The debates of the 1980s regarding responsible use of computer-based test interpretation (CBTI) software have mostly disappeared, as CBTI use has become common practice. We surveyed 364 members of the Society for Personality Assessment to determine how they use CBTI software in their work and their perspectives on the ethics of using CBTI in various ways. Psychologists commonly use CBTI software for test scoring and to provide a complementary source of input for case formulations. Most do not use CBTI software as the primary way to formulate a case, nor as an alternative to a written report. Controversy and uncertainty were expressed about importing sections of CBTI narratives into psychological reports. We distinguish between support and replacement functions of CBTI use, arguing that adequate research evidence should be present before using CBTI as a replacement for established assessment procedures.
Alexander, J. E.
, & Davidoff, D. A. (1990). Psychological testing, computers, and aging. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 3, 47-56.
2.
Allard, G.
, Butler, J., Faust, D., & Shea, M. T. (1995). Errors in hand scoring objective personality tests: The case of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised (PDQ-R). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 304-308.
3.
American Psychological Association
. (1986). Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Ball, J. D.
, Archer, R. P., & Imhof, E. A. (1994). Time requirements of psychological testing: A survey of practitioners. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 239-249.
5.
Butcher, J. N.
, Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
Butcher, J. N.
, Keller, L. S., & Bacon, S. F. (1985). Current developments and future directions in computerized personality assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 803-815.
7.
Derogatis, L. R.
(1994). Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R) administration, scoring, and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
8.
Ehrenworth, N. V.
, & Archer, R. P. (1985). A comparison of clinical accuracy ratings of interpretive approaches for adolescent MMPI responses. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 413-421.
9.
Exner, J. E.
(1993). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system: Vol. 1. Basic foundations (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
10.
Exner, J. E.
, & Ona, N. (1995). Rorschach interpretation assistance Program (Version 3.12 [Computer software]. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
11.
Fowler, R. D.
(1985). Landmarks in computer-assisted psychological assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 748-759.
12.
Garb, H. N.
(1992). The debate over the use of computer-based test reports. The Clinical Psychologist, 45, 95-100.
13.
Hyler, S. E.
, Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Kellman, H. D., & Doidge, N. (1992). Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised: A replication in an outpatient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 33, 73-77.
14.
Matarazzo, J. M.
(1983). Computerized psychological testing. Science, 221, 323-323.
15.
Matarazzo, J. M.
(1986). Computerized psychological test interpretation: All mean and no sigma. American Psychologist, 41, 14-24.
16.
McMinn, M. R.
(1998). Technology in practice. In M. Hersen & A. S. Bellack (Series Eds.) & A. N. Wiens (Vol. Ed.), Comprehensive clinical psychology: Vol. 10. Professional issues (pp. 363-375). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
17.
McMinn, M. R.
, Buchanan, T., Ellens, B. M., & Ryan, M. K. (in press). Technology, professional practice, and ethics: Survey findings and implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.
Millon, T.
(1994). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
20.
Millon, T.
, Green, C. J., & Meagher, R. B., Jr. (1982). Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory. Minnetonka, MN: NCS Assessments.
21.
Moreland, K. L.
(1985). Validation of computer-based test interpretations: Problems and prospects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 816-825.
22.
Moreland, K. L.
(1990). Some observations on computer-assisted psychological testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 820-823.
23.
Pope, K. S.
, Tabachnick, B. G., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (1987). Ethics of practice: The beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as therapists. American Psychologist, 42, 993-1006.
24.
Rubenzer, S.
(1991). Computerized testing and clinical judgment: Cause for concern. The Clinical Psychologist, 44, 63-66.
25.
Spielberger, C. D.
, & Piotrowski, C. (1990). Clinician's attitudes toward computer-based testing. The Clinical Psychologist, 43, 60-63.
26.
Watkins, C. E.
, Campbell, V. L., Nieberding, R., & Hallmark, R. (1995). Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 54-60.
