Section 3 of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) includes a hybrid model of personality pathology, in which dimensional personality traits are used to derive one of seven categorical personality disorder diagnoses. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) was developed by the DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders workgroup and their consultants to produce a freely available instrument to assess the personality traits within this new system. To date, the psychometric properties of the PID-5 have been evaluated primarily in undergraduate student and community adult samples. In the current investigation, we extend this line of research to a psychiatric patient sample who participated in the APA DSM-5 Field Trial (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health site). A total of 201 psychiatric patients (102 men, 99 women) completed the PID-5 and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). The internal consistencies of the PID-5 domain and facet trait scales were acceptable. Results supported the unidimensional structure of all trait scales but one, and the convergence between the PID-5 and analogous NEO PI-R scales. Evidence for discriminant validity was mixed. Overall, the current investigation provides support for the psychometric properties of this diagnostic instrument in psychiatric samples.
AndersonJ. L.SellbomM.BagbyR. M.QuiltyL. C.VeltriC. O.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 286-294.
2.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.de VriesR. E.HendrickseJ.BornM. P. (2012). The maladaptive personality traits of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 641-659.
3.
BagbyR. M.CostaP. T.McCraeR. R.LivesleyW. J.KennedyS. H.LevitanR. D.YoungL. T. (1999). Replicating the five factor model of personality in a psychiatric sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1135-1139.
4.
ClarkL. A. (1993). Manual for the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
ClarkL. A.SimmsL. J.WuK. D.CasillasA. (in press). Manual for the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality– 2nd edition (SNAP-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
ClarkeD. E.NarrowW. E.RegierD. A.KuramotoS. J.KupferD. J.KuhlE. A.KraemerH. C. (2013). DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part I: Study design, sampling strategy, implementation, and analytic approaches. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 43-58.
7.
CostaP. T.BagbyR. M.HerbstJ. H.McCraeR. R. (2005). Personality self-reports are concurrently reliable and valid during acute depressive episodes. Journal of Affective Disorders, 89, 45-55.
8.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9.
De FruytF.De ClercqB.De BolleM.WilleB.MarkonK.KruegerR. F. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295-307.
10.
De FruytF.Van LeeuwenK.BagbyR. M.RollandJ.RouillonF. (2006). Assessing and interpreting personality change and continuity in patients treated for major depression. Psychological Assessment, 18, 71-80.
11.
EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J.BarrettP. (1985). A revised version of the Psychoticism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21-29.
12.
GignacG. E.BatesT. C.JangK. L. (2007). Implications relevant to CFA model misfit, reliability, and the five-factor model as measured by the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1051-1062.
13.
HarknessA. R.FinnJ. A.McNultyJ. L.ShieldsS. M. (2012). The personality Psychopathology-Five (PSY-5): Recent constructive replication and assessment literature review. Psychological Assessment, 24, 432-443.
14.
HarknessA. R.McNultyJ. L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Issues from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In StrackS.LorrM. (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291-315). New York, NY: Springer.
15.
HopwoodC. J.SchadeN.KruegerR. F.WrightA. G. C.MarkonK. E. (in press). Connecting DSM-5 personality traits and pathological beliefs: Toward a unifying model. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment.
16.
HopwoodC. J.ThomasK. M.MarkonK. E.WrightA. G. C.KruegerR. F. (2012). DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 424-432.
17.
HornJ. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
18.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890.
19.
KruegerR. F.EatonN. R.ClarkL. A.WatsonD.MarkonK. E.DerringerJ.LivesleyW. J. (2011). Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 170-191.
20.
LivesleyW. J.JangK. L.VernonP. A. (1998). Phenotypic and genetic structure of traits delineating personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 941-948.
21.
McDonaldR. P. (1970). The theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical and Mathematical Psychology, 23, 1-21.
22.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
23.
NarrowW. E.ClarkeD. E.KuramotoS. J.KraemerH. C.KupferD. J.GreinerL.RegierD. A. (2013). DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part III: Development and reliability testing of a cross-cutting symptom assessment for DSM-5. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 71-82.
24.
O’ConnorB. P. (2000). SPSS, SAS, and MATLAB programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396-402.
25.
RegierD. A.NarrowW. E.ClarkeD. E.KraemerH. C.KuramotoS. J.KuhlE. A.KupferD. J. (2013). DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: Test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 59-70.
26.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326-1342.
27.
TackettJ. L.SilberschmidtA.KruegerR. F.SponheimS. (2008). A dimensional model of personality disorder: Incorporating DSM Cluster A characteristics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 454-459.
28.
ThomasK. M.YalchM. M.KruegerR. F.WrightA. G. C.MarkonK. E.HopwoodC. (2013). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment, 20, 308-311.
29.
VelicerW. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
30.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.ChmielewskiM. (2008). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology: II. Further articulation of a comprehensive unified trait structure. Journal of Personality, 76, 1545-1586.
31.
WatsonD.StasikS. M.RoE.ClarkL. A. (2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relating the DSM-5 trait dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 20, 312-326.
32.
WrightA. G. C.PincusA. L.HopwoodC. J.ThomasK. M.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F. (2012). An interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 19, 263-275.
33.
WrightA. G. C.ThomasK. M.HopwoodC. J.MarkonK. E.PincusA. L.KruegerR. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951-957.
