Validation of Reliable Digits for Detection of Malingering

Abstract

This study is a cross validation of the previous work by Greiffenstein, Baker, and Gola (1994) and Greiffenstein, Gola, and Baker (1995) on the Reliable Digits (RD) method of detecting possible malingering. This study consisted of 47 mild brain-injured litigating and 49 mild brain-injured non-litigating participants. The result of this study was that only 4.1% of the non-litigating participants were classified as malingering by RD, while 48.9% of the litigating participants were classified as malingering by RD. Comparing litigating participants' performance on a forced choice task with their RD revealed that 77.8% (7/9) who failed the forced choice task also failed RD. RD classified more litigating patients as malingering than did the forced choice task and none of the non-litigating participants failed forced choice. These findings underscore the previous recommendations of Greiffenstein et al. (1994, 1995), that it is important to assess motivation on specific neuropsychological tests and that motivation on neuropsychological tests is not an all or none phenomenon.

Keywords

Malingering neuropsychology Reliable Digits Forced choice brain injury litigation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benton, A. , Hamsher, K. , Varney, N. , & Spreen, O. (1983). Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: A clinical manual. New York: Oxford University Press.

Brandt, J. , Rubinsky, E. , & Larson, G. (1985). Uncovering malingered amnesia. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 44, 502-503.

Greiffenstein, M. , Baker, J. , & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218-224.

Greiffenstein, M. , Gola, T. , & Baker, J. (1995). MMPI-2 validity scales versus domain specific measures in detection of factitious traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9(3), 230-240.

Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Mack, W. , Freed, D. , Williams, B. , & Henderson, V. (1992). Boston Naming Test: Short versions for use in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, 154-158.

Meyers, J. , & Meyers, K. (1995). Rey Complex Figure and Recognition Trial: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Reitan, R. , & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.

Roberts, M. , Persinger, M. , Grote, C. , Evertowski, L. , Springer, J. , Tuten, T. , Moulden, D. , Franzen, K. , Roberts, R. , & Baglio, C. (1994). The Dichotic Word Listening Test: Preliminary Observations in American and Canadian Samples. Applied Neuropsychology, 1, 45-56.

10.

Spreen, S. , & Strauss, E. (1991). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.

11.

Ward, L. (1990). Prediction of Verbal, Performance and Full Scale IQs from seven subtests of the WAIS-R.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 436-440.