The present study used well-defined traumatic brain injury (TBI) and mixed neurological (other than TBI) and psychiatric samples to examine the specificity and sensitivity to Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction (MND) of four individual California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) variables and eight composite CVLT malingering indicators. Participants were 275 traumatic brain injury and 352 general clinical patients seen for neuropsychological evaluation. The TBI patients were assigned to one of five groups using the Slick, Sherman, and Iverson (1999) criteria: no incentive, incentive only, suspect, and malingering (both Probable MNDand Definite MND). Within TBI, persons with the strongest evidence for malingering (Probable and Definite) had the most extreme scores. Good sensitivity (approximately 50%) in the context of excellent specificity (> 95%) was found in the TBI samples. Issues related to the appropriate clinical application of these data are discussed.
Ashendorf, L., O'Bryant, S. E.,& McCaffrey, R. J. (2003). Specificity of malingering detection strategies in older adults using the CVLT and WCST. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 255-262.
2.
Bianchini, K. J., Mathias, C. W.,& Greve, K. W. (2001). Symptomvalidity testing: Acritical review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 19-45.
3.
Binder, L. M. (1993). Portland Digit Recognition Test manual(2nd ed.). Portland, OR: Private Publication.
4.
Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegren, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
Coleman, R. D., Rapport, L. J., Millis, S. R., Ricker, J. H., & Farchione, T. J. (1998). Effects of coaching on detection of malingering on the California Verbal Learning Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 201-210.
6.
Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (1987). California Verbal Learning Test: Research edition. New York: Psychological Corporation.
7.
Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test(2nd ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.
8.
Gouvier, W. D., Hayes, J. S., & Smiroldo, B. B. (1998). The significance of base rates, test sensitivity, test specificity and subject's knowledge of symptoms in assessing TBI sequelae and malingering. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation(pp. 55-80). New York: Plenum.
9.
Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J.,& Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesic measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218-224.
10.
Greve, K. W., & Bianchini, K. J. (2004). Setting empirical cutoffs on psychometric indicators of negative response bias: Amethodological commentary with recommendations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 533-541.
11.
Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Mathias, C. W., Houston, R. J.,& Crouch, J. A. (2002). Detecting malingered neurocognitive performance with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A preliminary investigation in traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 179-191.
12.
Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Mathias, C. W., Houston, R. J.,& Crouch, J. A. (2003). Detecting malingered performance on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Validation of Mittenberg's approach in traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 245-260.
13.
Hennekens, C. H., & Buring, J. E. (1987). Epidemiology in medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
14.
Kagehiro, D. (1990). Defining the standard proof in jury instructions. Psychological Science, 1, 194-200.
15.
Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Exaggerated MMPI-2 symptom report in personal injury litigants with Malingered Neurocognitive Deficit. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 673-676.
16.
Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment(4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
17.
Martens, M., Donders, J.,& Millis, S. R. (2001). Evaluation of invalid response sets after traumatic head injury. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2, 1-18.
18.
Mathias, C. W., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Houston, R. J.,& Crouch, J. A. (2002). Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction using the reliable digit span in traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 9, 301-308.
19.
Meyers, J. E., & Diep, A. (2000). Assessment of malingering in chronic pain patients using neuropsychological tests. Applied Neuropsychology, 7, 133-139.
20.
Meyers, J. E.,& Volbrecht, M. (1998). Validation of reliable digits for detection of malingering. Assessment, 5, 303-307.
21.
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee of the Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. (1993). Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 86-87.
22.
Millis, S. R. (2004). Evaluation of malingered neurocognitive disorders. In M. Rizzo& P. J. Esslinger (Eds.), Principles and practice of behavioral neurology and neuropsychology(pp. 1077-1089). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.
23.
Millis, S. R., & Putnam, S. H. (1997). The CVLT in the assessment of financially compensable mild head injury: Further development. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Neuropsychology Society, Bergen, Norway.
24.
Millis, S. R., Putnam, S. H., Adams, K. M., & Ricker, J. H. (1995). The California Verbal Learning Test in the detection of incomplete effort in neuropsychological evaluation. Psychological Assessment, 7, 463-471.
25.
Millis, S. R., & Volinsky, C. T. (2001). Assessment of response bias in mild head injury: Beyond malingering tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 809-828.
26.
Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M.,& Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 1094-1102.
27.
Mittenberg, W., Theroux, S., Aguila-Puentes, G., Bianchini, K., Greve, K., & Rayls, K. (2001). Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 440-445.
28.
Mittenberg, W., Theroux-Fichera, S., Zielinski, R. E., & Heilbronner, R. L. (1995). Identification of malingered head injury on the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 491-498.
29.
Rabin, L. A., Barr, W. B., & Burton, L. A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 33-65.
30.
Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S.,& Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingering neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545-561.
31.
Suhr, J. A.,& Boyer, D. (1999). Uses of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in the detection of malingering in student simulator and patient samples. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 701-708.
32.
Sweet, J. J., Wolfe, P., Sattlberger, E., Numan, B., Rosenfeld, J. P., Clingerman, S., et al. (2000). Further investigation of traumatic brain injury versus insufficient effort with the California Verbal Learning Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 105-113.
33.
Tombaugh, T. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering manual. New York: Multi Health Systems.
34.
Trueblood, W. (1994). Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of malingered and other invalid WAIS-R and clinical memory data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 597-607.
