The Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) is a 48-item self-report inventory designed to measure three basic coping styles: Task Oriented, Emotion Oriented, and Avoidance Oriented coping. The psychometric properties of this inventory are promising, but CISS scores have not yet been shown to reflect behavioral variation in response to stress. This study was designed as a first step toward this end by examining the relationship between selfand peer-report on the CISS. One hundred and sixty-three pairs of friends completed the CISS, a peer form of the CISS, and a friendship questionnaire. Positive but modest correlations were found for each construct. Higher correlations were obtained when comparing scores across forms completed by the same informant, indicating that examinees believe their friends cope as they do themselves. Actual friend similarity was apparent only on Avoidance Oriented coping. Neither depth of relationship nor item observability moderated peer-self agreement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Auerbach, S. M.
(1989). Stress management and coping research in the health care setting: An overview and methodological commentary. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 388-395.
2.
Cheek, J. M.
(1982). Aggregation, moderator variables, and the validity of personality tests: A peer-rating study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1254-1269.
3.
Cohen, J.
(1978). Partialed products are interactions: Partialed powers are curve components. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 858-866.
4.
Costa, P. T.
, Busch, C. M., Zonderman, A. B., & McCrae, R. R. (1986). Correlations of MMPI factor scales with measures of the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 640-650.
5.
Endler, N. S.
, & Parker, J. D. A. (1990a). Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS): Manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
6.
Endler, N. S.
, & Parker, J. D. A. (1990b). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844-854.
7.
Endler, N. S.
, & Parker, J. D. A. (1990c). State and trait anxiety, depression, and coping styles. Australian Journal of Psychology, 42, 207-220.
8.
Endler, N. S.
, & Parker, J. D. A. (1994). Assessment of multidimensional coping: Task, emotion, and avoidance strategies. Psychological Assessment, 6, 50-60.
9.
Endler, N. S.
, Parker,J. D. A., & Butcher,J. N. (1993). A factor analytical study of coping styles and the MMPI-2 content scales. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 523-527.
10.
Funder, D. C.
, & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
11.
Gormly, J.
(1984). Correspondence between personality trait ratings and behavioral events.Journal of Personality, 52, 220-232.
12.
Janzen, B. L.
, Kelly, I. W., & Saklofske, D. H. (1992). Bulimic symptomatology and coping in a nonclinical sample. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 395-399.
13.
Kenrick, D. T.
, & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.
14.
Kenrick, D. T.
, & Stringfield, D. O. (1980). Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review, 87, 88-104.
15.
Lubinski, D.
, & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). Assessing spurious "moderator effects": Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized ("synergistic") relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 385-393.
16.
McCrae, R. R.
(1982). Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and ratings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 293-303.
17.
McCrae, R. R.
(1994). The counterpoint of personality assessment: Self-report and observer ratings. Assessment, 1, 159-172.
18.
McCrae, R. R.
, & Costa, P. T. (1989). Different points of view: Self-reports and ratings in the assessment of personality. In J. P. Forgas & M. J. Innes (Eds.), Recent advances in social psychology: An international perspective (pp. 429-439). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
19.
Miller, S. M.
, Brody, D. S., & Summerton, J. (1988). Styles of coping with threat: Implications for health.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 142-148.
20.
Newcomb, T. M.
(1978). The acquaintance process: Looking mainly backwards.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1075-1083.
21.
Norman, W. T.
, & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681-691.
22.
Nunnally, J. C.
(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Parker, J. D. A.
, & Endler, N. S. (1992). Coping with coping assessment: A critical review. European Journal of Personality, 6, 321-344.
24.
Paulhus, D. L.
, & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816-824.
25.
Watson, D.
(1989). Strangers' ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of a surprising convergence with self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57,120-128.
26.
Wiggins, J. S.
(1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Wright, P. H.
(1985). The Acquaintance Description Form. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 39-62). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
28.
Wright, P. H. (1991). The acquaintance description form: What it is and how to use it. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Dakota at Grand Forks.
29.
Zuckerman, M.
, Bernieri, F., Koestner, R., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). To predict some of the people some of the time: In search of moderators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 279-293.
