Assessment procedures for personality disorders (PDs) typically rely on self-reports, even though some people with PDs may be unable to view themselves realistically or are unwilling to report socially undesirable traits. Close associates may provide important information regarding the presence of PD traits. Peer nomination is a reliable and valid assessment procedure that can be adapted to the study of PDs for research purposes. This study focused on characteristic features that define narcissistic, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive PDs using information collected from both self and others in a nonclinical sample of women. It was designed to identify specific areas of agreement and discrepancy between self-report and peer assessment in the measurement of characteristic features of these disorders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association
. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., Rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association
. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Bagby, R. M.
, Joffe, R. T., Parker, J. D. A., & Schuller, D. R. (1995). Re-examination of the evidence for the DSMIII personality disorder clusters. Journal of Personality Disorders, 7, 320-328.
4.
Cronbach, L. J.
, Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1971). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements. New York: Wiley.
5.
Dowson, J. H.
(1992). Assessment of DSM-III-R personality disorders by self-report questionnaire: The role of informants and a screening test for co-morbid personality disorders (STCPD). British Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 344-352.
6.
First, M. B.
, Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1995). The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II): I. Description. Journal of Personality Disorders, 9, 83-91.
7.
Funder, D. C.
, & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158.
8.
Funder, D. C.
, & Sneed, C. D. (1993). Behavioral manifestations of personality: An ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 479-490.
9.
Gough, H. G.
(1951). California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
10.
Grove, W. M.
, & Tellegen, A. (1991). Problems in the classification of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 5, 31-41.
11.
Hunt, C.
, & Andrews, G. (1992). Measuring personality disorder: The use of self-report questionnaires. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 125-133.
12.
Hyler, S. E.
, Lyons, M., Rieder, R. O., Young, L., Williams, J. B., & Spitzer, R. L. (1990). The factor structure of self-report DSM-III axis II symptoms and their relationship to clinicians' ratings. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 751-757.
13.
Kane, J. S.
, & Lawler, E. E. (1978). Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 555-586.
14.
Kenrick, D. T.
, & Stringfield, D. O. (1980). Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophic boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review, 87, 88-104.
15.
Lenzenweger, M. F.
, Loranger, A. W., Korfine, L., & Neff, C. (1997). Detecting personality disorders in a nonclinical population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 345-351.
16.
Loranger, A. W.
, Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Sartorius, N., & Regier, D. A. (1991). The WHO/ADAMHA International Pilot Study of Personality Disorders: Background and purpose. Journal of Personality Disorders, 5, 296-306.
17.
Norman, W.T.
(1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
18.
Norman, W. T.
, & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681-691.
19.
Norusis, M. J.
(1994). SPSS: Professional statistics, 6.1. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
20.
Perry, J. C.
(1992). Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1645-1653.
21.
Peselow, E. D.
, Sanfilipo, M. P., & Fieve, R. R. (1994). Patients' and informants' reports of personality traits during and after major depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 819-824.
22.
Pilgrim, J. A.
, Mellers, J. D., Boothby, H. A., & Mann, A. H. (1993). Inter-rater and temporal reliability of the standardized assessment of personality and the influence of informant characteristics. Psychological Medicine, 23, 779-786.
23.
Riso, L. P.
, Klein, D. N., Anderson, R. L., Ouimette, P. C., & Lizardi, H. (1994). Concordance between patients and informants on the personality disorder examination. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 568-573.
24.
Shrout, P. E.
, & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
25.
Torgersen, S.
, Skre, I., Onstad, S., Edvardsen, J., Kringler, E. (1993). The psychometric-genetic structure of DSM-III-R personality disorder criteria.Journal of Personality Disorders, 7, 196-213.
26.
Tyrer, P.
(1995). Are personality disorders well classified in DSM-IV? In W. J. Livesley (Ed.), The DSM-IV personality disorders (pp. 29-42). New York: Guilford.
27.
Watson, D.
, & Clark, L. A. (1991). Selfversus peer ratings of specific emotional traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 927-940.
28.
White, P. D.
, & Nias, D. K. B. (1994). A comparison of self-report and relative ratings of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 801-803.
29.
Widiger, T. A.
(1993). The DSM-III-R categorical personality disorder diagnoses: A critique and an alternative. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 75-90.
30.
Willingham, W. W.
(1959). On deriving standard scores for peer nominations with subgroups of unequal size. Psychological Reports, 5, 397-403.
31.
Zimmerman, M.
(1994). Diagnosing personality disorders: A review of issues and research methods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 225-245.
32.
Zimmerman, M.
, Pfohl, B., Coryell, W., Stangl, D., & Corenthal, C. (1988). Diagnosing personality disorder in depressed patients: A comparison of patient and informant interviews. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 733-737.
