The effects of two levels of information about the validity scales of the MMPI-2 on underreporting of symptoms were investigated in a college-student population. Subjects who were instructed and offered incentives to underreport were given no information, general information, or detailed information about the validity scales and were compared to a standard-control group. Results suggested that traditional and supplementary underreporting scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory—2 (MMPI-2) are effective in discriminating standard subjects from uncoached underre-porters, but are much less effective in discriminating standard subjects from subjects given either general or detailed information about the underreporting scales. The findings suggest that coaching may enable some subjects to underreport symptoms without detection, but that at least one scale (Wsd) shows promising resistance to coaching.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611
2.
BaerR. A.WetterM. W.BerryD. T. R. (1992). Detection of underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 509–525
3.
BaerR. A.WetterM. W.NicholsD. S.GreeneR.BerryD. T. R. (in press). Sensitivity of MMPI-2 validity scales to underreporting of symptoms. Psychological Assessment.
4.
BagbyR. M.RogersR.BuisT. (1994). Detecting malingered and defensive responding on the MMPI-2 in a forensic inpatient sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 191–203
5.
Ben-PorathY. S. (1994). The ethical dilemma of coached malingering research. Psychological Assessment, 6, 14–15
6.
BerryD. T. R.LambD. G.WetterM. W.BaerR. A.WidigerT. A. (1994). Ethical considerations in research on coached malingering. Psychological Assessment, 6, 16–17
7.
ButcherJ. N. (1979). Use of the MMPI in personnel selection. In ButcherJ. N., (Ed.), New developments in the use of the MMPI (pp. 165–201). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
8.
ButcherJ.DahlstromW.GrahamJ.TellegenA.KaemmerB. (1989). Manual for administering and scoring the MMPI-2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
9.
ButcherJ. N.HanK. (1993, March). Development of an MMPI-2 scale to assess the presentation of self in a superlative manner: The S scale. Paper presented at the 28th annual symposium on Recent Developments in the Use of the MMPI/MMPI-2/MMPI-A, St. Petersburg Beach, FL
10.
CoferC. N.ChanceJ.JudsonA. J. (1949). A study of malingering on the MMPI. Journal of Psychology, 27, 491–499
11.
DerogatisL. R.MelisaratosN. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605
12.
EdwardsA. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden
13.
GoughH. G. (1950). The F minus K dissimulation index for the MMPI. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 14, 408–413
14.
GrahamJ. R. (1990). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology. New York: Oxford
15.
GreeneR. L. (1991). The MMPI-2/MMPI: An interpretive manual. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
16.
GrossmanL. S.CavanaughJ. L. (1989). Do sex offenders minimize psychiatric symptoms?Journal of Forensic Sciences, 34, 881–886
17.
HanleyC. (1957). Deriving a measure of test-taking defensiveness. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 391–397
18.
HathawayS. R.McKinleyJ. C. (1951). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation
19.
LambD. G.BerryD. T. R.WetterM. W.BaerR. A. (1994). Effects of two types of information on malingering of closed head injury on the MMPI-2: An analogue investigation. Psychological Assessment, 6, 8–13
20.
Lees-HaleyP. (1992). Efficacy of MMPI-2 validity scales and MCMI-II modifier scales for detecting spurious PTSD claims. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 681–689
21.
Lees-HaleyP. (1993). Exposing the truth: Refuting evidence of malingering. Trial, 29, 66–70
22.
LubinB.LarsenR.MatarazzoJ. (1984). Patterns of psychological test usage in the United States: 1935–1982. American Psychologist, 39, 451–454
23.
NicholsD. S. (1992). Development of a global measure for positive mental health. Unpublished materials. (Available from David Nichols, PhD, Dammasch State Hospital, Wilsonville, OR 97070)
24.
NicholsD. S.GreeneR. L. (1991). New measures for dissimulation on the MMPI/MMPI-2. Paper presented at the 26th annual symposium on Recent Developments in the Use of the MMPI, St. Petersburg Beach, FL
25.
PlattJ.HusbandS. (1986). Post-traumatic stress disorder in forensic practice. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 4, 29–56
26.
PopeK. S.ButcherJ. N.SeelenJ. (1993). The MMPI, MMPI-2, and MMPI-A in court: A practical guide for expert witnesses and attorneys. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
27.
RogersR. (1988). Researching dissimulation. In RogersR., (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 309–327). New York: Guilford
28.
RogersR.BagbyR. M.ChakrabortyD. (1993). Feigning schizophrenic disorders on the MMPI-2: Detection of coached simulators. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 215–226
29.
RosenthalR. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
30.
SmithM. L.GlassG. V.MillerT. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
31.
WetterM. W.BaerR. A.BerryD. T. R.RobisonL.SumpterJ. (1993). MMPI-2 profiles of motivated fakers given specific symptom information: A comparison to matched patients. Psychological Assessment, 5, 317–323
32.
WetterM. W.CorriganS. K. (1994). Providing information to clients about psychological tests: A survey of attorneys' attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication
33.
WigginsJ. S. (1959). Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instructions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 419–427
34.
ZiskinJ.FaustD. (1988). Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony (Vol. 2, 4th ed.). Marina del Rey, CA: Law & Psychology Press
