This study examined statistical bias in the measurement of personality psychopathology in the Latinx population using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3). Data were extracted from two studies that yielded a composite data set of 103 White individuals and 250 Latinx individuals. All participants were administered the MMPI-2-Restructured Form-Extended Battery (MMPI-2-RF-EX) or MMPI-3 and the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF). First, we conducted correlation analyses between theoretically overlapping scales of the PID-5-SF and the MMPI-3 among White and Latinx individuals. The majority of theoretically associated scales were found to be at least moderately associated in the total sample. In addition, Steiger’s z-tests indicated that correlations were similar in magnitude across the White and Latinx ethnic groups. Hierarchical regression subsequently determined the presence of slope and/or intercept bias. Only one analysis (the MMPI-3 Anger Proneness prediction of PID-5-SF Negative Affectivity) indicated statistically significant intercept bias. No evidence of slope bias was found. In other words, these analyses indicated that the vast majority of the relationships between MMPI-3 scales and associated personality psychopathology constructs (as measured by the PID-5-SF) remained consistent across both ethnic groups. Overall, the results supported the appropriate cross-cultural use of the MMPI-3 to assess personality psychopathology.
AlamillaS. G.WojcikJ. V. (2013). Assessing for personality disorders in the Hispanic client. In BenutoL. (Ed.), Guide to psychological assessment with Hispanics (pp. 215–241). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4412-1_15
2.
Al-DajaniN.GralnickT. M.BagbyR. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID–5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572
3.
AlujaA.GarcíaL. F.CuevasL.LucasI. (2019). Dimensional pathological personality predicting personality disorders: Comparison of the DAPP-BQ and PID-5 shortened versions in a Spanish Community Sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 41(1), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9706-2
4.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
5.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
6.
AndersonJ. L.SellbomM. (2021). Assessing ICD-11 personality trait domain qualifiers with the MMPI-2-RF. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 1090–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23099
7.
AndersonJ. L.SellbomM.AyearstL.QuiltyL. C.ChmielewskiM.BagbyR. M. (2015). Associations between DSM-5 section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales in a psychiatric patient sample. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000096
8.
AndersonJ. L.SellbomM.BagbyR. M.QuiltyL. C.VeltriC. O. C.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20(3), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112471141
9.
AndersonJ. L.SellbomM.PymontC.SmidW.De SaegerH.KamphuisJ. H. (2015). Measurement of DSM-5 section II personality disorder constructs using the MMPI-2-RF in clinical and forensic samples. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 786–800. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000103
10.
AndersonJ. L.WoodM. E.TarescavageA. M.BurchettD.GlassmireD. M. (2018). The role of dimensional personality psychopathology in a forensic inpatient psychiatric setting. Journal of Personality Disorders, 32(4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2017_31_301
11.
BachB.SellbomM.SimonsenE. (2018). Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5)in clinical versus nonclinical individuals: Generalizability of psychometric features. Assessment, 25(7), 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117709070
12.
Ben-PorathY. S.TellegenA. (2011). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 2008)
13.
Ben-PorathY. S.TellegenA. (2020). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
14.
BenutoL. T.CasasJ. B.BennettN. M.LeanyB. D. (2020). The MMPI-2-RF: A pilot study of Latinx vs. non-Latinx Whites profiles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 51(5), 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000359
15.
BenutoL. T.GonzalezF.Reinosa-SegoviaF.DuckworthM. (2019). Mental health literacy, stigma, and behavioral health service use: The case of Latinx and non-Latinx whites. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 6(6), 1122–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-019-00614-8
16.
BreslauJ.KendlerK. S.SuM.Gaxiola-AguilarS.KesslerR. C. (2005). Lifetime risk and persistence of psychiatric disorders across ethnic groups in the United States. Psychological Medicine, 35(3), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291704003514
ButcherJ.N.DahlstromW.G.GrahamJ.R.TellegenA.KaemmerB. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for Administration and Scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
ChapmanL. K.DeLappR. C. T.WilliamsM. T. (2014). Impact of race, ethnicity, and culture on the expression and assessment of psychopathology. In BeidelD. C.FruehB. C.HersenM. (Eds.), Adult psychopathology and diagnosis (7th ed., pp. 131–162). John Wiley & Sons.
De SaegerH.KamphuisJ. H.AndersonJ. L. (2020). Clinical utility of the MMPI-2-RF hierarchical description: An illustration in Cluster C personality disorder patients. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(5), 907–912. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000560
23.
DunneA. L.GilbertF.DaffernM. (2018). Investigating the relationship between DSM-5 personality disorder domains and facets and aggression in an offender population using the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 32(5), 668–693. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2017_31_322
24.
FinnJ. A.ArbisiP. A.ErbesC. R.PolusnyM. A.ThurasP. (2014). The MMPI–2 restructured form personality psychopathology five scales: Bridging DSM-5 section 2 personality disorders and DSM-5 section 3 personality trait dimensions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.866569
25.
FreilichC. D.PalumboI. M.LatzmanR. D.KruegerR. F. (2023). Assessing the measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across Black and White Americans. Psychological Assessment, 35(9), 721–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001255
26.
GaddisB. H.FosterJ. L.LemmingM. R. (2015). A comparative review of current practices in personality assessment norming. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 23(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12091
27.
GarcíaL. F.AlujaA.UrietaP.GutierrezF. (2022). High convergent validity among the five-factor model, PID-5-SF, and PiCD. Personality Disorders, 13(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000486
GudiñoO. G.NadeemE.KataokaS. H.LauA. S. (2011). Relative impact of violence exposure and immigrant stressors on Latino youth psychopathology. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(3), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20435
31.
GutiérrezF.AlujaA.PeriJ. M.CalvoN.FerrerM.BaillésE.Gutiérrez-ZotesJ. A.GárrizM.CaserasX.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Spanish PID-5 in a clinical and a community sample. Assessment, 24(3), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115606518
32.
HallJ. T.MentonW. H.Ben-PorathY. S. (2022). Examining the psychometric equivalency of MMPI-3 scale scores derived from the MMPI-3 and the MMPI-2-RF-EX. Assessment, 29(4), 842-853.
33.
HamiltonJ. E.HeadsA. M.MeyerT. D.DesaiP. V.OkusagaO. O.ChoR. Y. (2018). Ethnic differences in the diagnosis of schizophrenia and mood disorders during admission to an academic safety-net psychiatric hospital. Psychiatry Research, 267, 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.043
34.
HopwoodC. J.FlatoC. G.AmbwaniS.GarlandB. H.MoreyL. C. (2009). A comparison of Latino and Anglo socially desirable responding. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(7), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20584
35.
HopwoodC. J.KotovR.KruegerR. F.WatsonD.WidigerT. A.AlthoffR. R.AnsellE. B.BachB.Michael BagbyR.BlaisM. A.BornovalovaM. A.ChmielewskiM.CiceroD. C.ConwayC.De ClercqB.De FruytF.DochertyA. R.EatonN. R.EdensJ. F. . . ZimmermannJ. (2018). The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis. Personality and Mental Health, 12(1), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1408
36.
HopwoodC. J.MulayA. L.WaughM. H. (2019). The DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders: Integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment (HopwoodC. J.MulayA. L.WaughM. H., Eds.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi-org.ezproxy.shsu.edu/10.4324/9781315205076
37.
KamphuisJ. H.ArbisiP. A.Ben-PorathY. S.McNultyJ. L. (2008). Detecting comorbid Axis-II status among inpatients using the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical Scales. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.3.157
38.
KremyarA. J.WygantD. B. (2023). Measuring internalizing psychopathology using the MMPI-3: An examination of convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 45(3), 671–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-023-10048-6
39.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
40.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2013). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 brief form (PID-5-BF).
41.
KruegerR. F.MarkonK. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
42.
KruegerR. F.SkodolA. E.LivesleyW. J.ShroutP. E.HuangY. (2007). Synthesizing dimensional and categorical approaches to personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM-V Axis II. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 16(Suppl. 1), S65–S73. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.212
43.
LeongF. T. L.ParkY. S. (2016). Testing and Assessment with Persons & Communities of Color. American Psychological Association.
44.
LipsonS. K.KernA.EisenbergD.Breland-NobleA. M. (2018). Mental health disparities among college students of color. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 63(3), 348–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.04.014
45.
MalgadyR. G.RoglerL. H.CostantinoG. (1987). Ethnocultural and linguistic bias in mental health evaluation of Hispanics. The American Psychologist, 42(3), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.42.3.228
46.
MaplesJ. L.CarterN. T.FewL. R.CregoC.GoreW. L.SamuelD. B.WilliamsonR. L.LynamD. R.WidigerT. A.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F.MillerJ. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1195–1210. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000120
47.
MarekR. J.Ben-PorathY. S.SellbomM.McNultyJ. L.HeinbergL. J. (2015). Validity of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scores as a function of gender, ethnicity, and age of bariatric surgery candidates. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 11(3), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.10.005
48.
McCabeG. A.WidigerT. A. (2020). A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 section III personality disorder models. Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000772
49.
MilinkovicM. S.TiliopoulosN. (2020). A systematic review of the clinical utility of the DSM-5 section III alternative model of personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(6), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000408
50.
MinskyS.VegaW.MiskimenT.GaraM.EscobarJ. (2003). Diagnostic patterns in Latino, African American, and European American psychiatric patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(6), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.6.637
PhilbinM. M.FlakeM.HatzenbuehlerM. L.HirschJ. S. (2018). State-level immigration and immigrant-focused policies as drivers of Latino health disparities in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 199, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.007
53.
SellbomM. (2019). The MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Assessment of personality and psychopathology in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095701
54.
SellbomM.AndersonJ. L.BagbyR. M. (2013). Assessing DSM-5 Section III personality traits and disorders with the MMPI-2-RF. Assessment, 20(6), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113508808
55.
SellbomM.SmidW.De SaegerH.SmitN.KamphuisJ. H. (2014). Mapping the personality psychopathology five domains onto DSM-IV personality disorders in Dutch clinical and forensic samples: Implications for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.825625
56.
SellbomM.SmithA. (2017). Assessment of DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorders With the MMPI-2-RF in a Nonclinical Sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(4), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1242074
57.
ThimmJ. C.JordanS.BachB. (2016). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): Psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population. BMC Psychology, 4(1), Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0169-5
58.
ThomasK. M.YalchM. M.KruegerR. F.WrightA. G. C.MarkonK. E.HopwoodC. J. (2013). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment, 20(3), 308–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112457589
59.
TurnerE. A.ChengH. S.LlamasJ.TranA.HillK.Loung-TranC.FrettsJ. M.MercadoA. (2016). Factors impacting the current trends in the use of outpatient psychiatric treatment among diverse ethnic groups. Current Psychiatric Reviews, 12, 199–220.
Van der HeijdenP. T.EggerJ. I. M.RossiG. M. P.DerksenJ. J. L. (2012). Integrating psychopathology and personality disorders conceptualized by the MMPI-2-RF and the MCMI-III: A structural validity study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.656861
WrightA. G. C.PincusA. L.HopwoodC. J.ThomasK. M.MarkonK. E.KruegerR. F. (2012). An interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 19(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112446657
65.
ZahnN.SellbomM.PymontC.SchenkP. W. (2017). Associations between MMPI-2-RF scale scores and self-reported personality disorder criteria in a private practice sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(4), 723–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9616-8
ZhangW.WangM.YuM.WangJ. (2022). The hierarchical structure and predictive validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in Chinese nonclinical adolescents. Assessment, 29(7), 1559–1575. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211022835
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
