Social media (SM) use has been primarily operationalized as frequency of use or as passive versus active use. We hypothesize that these constructs have shown mixed associations with psychological constructs because the factor structure underlying social media use (SMU) has not been fully identified. We conducted three studies with college students. In Study 1 (N = 176), we collected data about participants’ SMU, informing item generation. In Study 2 (N = 311), we tested two factor structures: (a) passive, active social, and active non-social and (b) a hypothesized four-factor structure. Neither confirmatory model produced acceptable fits, but an exploratory factor analysis suggested a four-factor model: belief-based, consumption-based, image-based, and comparison-based SMU. This four-factor structure was supported in Study 3 (N = 397), which was preregistered, via a confirmatory factor analysis. The subscale items showed good internal consistencies, and evidence is presented for convergent validity. These factors represent a novel classification of people’s SMU that can be measured with the Social Media Use Scale.
AichnerT.GrünfelderM.MaurerO.JegeniD. (2021). Twenty-five years of social media: A review of social media applications and definitions from 1994 to 2019. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(4), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0134
BeyensI.PouwelsJ. L.van DrielI. I.KeijsersL.ValkenburgP. M. (2021). Social media use and adolescents’ well-being: Developing a typology of person-specific effect patterns. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211038196
5.
BoerM.StevensG. W. J. M.FinkenauerC.van den EijndenR. J. J. M. (2022). The complex association between social media use intensity and adolescent wellbeing: A longitudinal investigation of five factors that may Affect the association. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107084
6.
BolinoM. C.TurnleyW. H. (1999). Measuring impression management in organizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819922005
7.
BoydD. M.EllisonN. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
8.
BurkeM.MarlowC.LentoT. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’10 (pp. 1909–1912). https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753613
9.
CostelloA. B.OsborneJ. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
10.
CoyneS. M.RogersA. A.ZurcherJ. D.StockdaleL.BoothM. (2020). Does time spent using social media impact mental health? An eight year longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106160
11.
Deditius-IslandH. K.CarusoJ. C. (2002). An examination of the reliability of scores from Zuckerman’s Sensation Seeking Scales, Form V. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 728–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402062004012
12.
DeVellisR. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE.
DukeD.KrishnanM.FaithM.StorchE. A. (2006). The psychometric properties of the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20(6), 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2005.11.002
15.
EldesoukyL.EnglishT. (2019). Individual differences in emotion regulation goals: Does personality predict the reasons why people regulate their emotions?Journal of Personality, 87(4), 750–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12430
16.
ErfaniS. S.AbedinB. (2018). Impacts of the use of social network sites on users’ psychological well-being: A systematic review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(7), 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24015
17.
Escobar-VieraC. G.ShensaA.BowmanN. D.SidaniJ. E.KnightJ.JamesA. E.PrimackB. A. (2018). Passive and active social media use and depressive symptoms among United States adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(7), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0668
18.
FloydF. J.WidamanK. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286
19.
FrankowskiS.LupoA. K.SmithB. A.Dane’ElM.RamosC.MoreraO. F. (2016). Developing and testing a scale to measure need for drama. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.009
20.
GadermannA. M.GuhnM.ZumboB. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 17, 3. https://doi.org/10.7275/N560-J767
21.
GentileB.TwengeJ. M.FreemanE. C.CampbellW. K. (2012). The effect of social networking websites on positive self-views: An experimental investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1929–1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.012
22.
GersonJ.PlagnolA. C.CorrP. J. (2017). Passive and active Facebook use measure (PAUM): Validation and relationship to the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.034
23.
GilbertP.BroomheadC.IronsC.McEwanK.BellewR.MillsA.GaleC.KnibbR. (2007). Development of a striving to avoid inferiority scale. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(3), 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X157789
24.
GloverN.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.CregoC.WidigerT. A. (2012). The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: A five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 500–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.670680
25.
HartE. A.LearyM. R.RejeskiW. J. (1989). Tie measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.11.1.94
26.
HowardM. (2016). Review of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve?International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664
27.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
28.
HuangC. (2017). Time spent on social network sites and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(6), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0758
29.
JensenM.GeorgeM. J.RussellM. R.OdgersC. L. (2019). Young adolescents’ digital technology use and mental health symptoms: Little evidence of longitudinal or daily linkages. Clinical Psychological Science, 76(6), 1416–1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619859336
30.
KrossE.VerduynP.SheppesG.CostelloC. K.JonidesJ.YbarraO. (2021). Social media and well-being: Pitfalls, progress, and next steps. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.005
31.
LearyM. R. (1983). A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(3), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283093007
32.
LearyM. R.Jongman-SerenoK. P.DiebelsK. J. (2015). Measures of concerns with public image and social evaluation. In Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 448–473). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00016-4
33.
LinR.UtzS. (2015). The emotional responses of browsing Facebook: Happiness, envy, and the role of tie strength. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.064
34.
MartinH. J. (1984). A revised measure of approval motivation and its relationship to social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(5), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4805_10
35.
MattickR. P.ClarkeJ. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6
36.
Maydeu-OlivaresA. (2017). Maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models for continuous data: Standard errors and goodness of fit. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1269606
37.
MillerJ. D.FewL. R.WilsonL.GentileB.WidigerT. A.MacKillopJ.Keith CampbellW. (2013). The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory (FFNI): A test of the convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of FFNI scores in clinical and community samples. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032536
38.
PavotW.DienerE. (2009). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. In DienerE. (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 101–117). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_5
PrestonC. C.ColmanA. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
41.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
42.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
43.
RichterD.WallA.BruenA.WhittingtonR. (2019). Is the global prevalence rate of adult mental illness increasing? Systematic review and meta analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 140(5), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13083
44.
RodebaughT. L.WoodsC. M.HeimbergR. G.LiebowitzM. R.SchneierF. R. (2006). The factor structure and screening utility of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.231
SaiphooA. N.Dahoah HaleviL.VahediZ. (2020). Social networking site use and self-esteem: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 153, 109639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109639
SeabrookE. M.KernM. L.RickardN. S. (2016). Social networking sites, depression, and anxiety: A systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 3(4), e5842. http://doi.org/10.2196/mental.5842
49.
ShabahangR.KimS.HosseinkhanzadehA. A.ArugueteM. S.KakabaraeeK. (2022). “Give your thumb a break” from surfing tragic posts: Potential corrosive consequences of social media users’ doomscrolling. Media Psychology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2157287
50.
SharmaB.LeeS. S.JohnsonB. K. (2022). The dark at the end of the tunnel: Doomscrolling on social media newsfeeds. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000059
51.
ShensaA.SidaniJ. E.DewM. A.Escobar-VieraC. G.PrimackB. A. (2018). Social media use and depression and anxiety symptoms: A cluster analysis. American Journal of Health Behavior, 42(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.42.2.11
SotoC. J. (2015). Is happiness good for your personality? Concurrent and prospective relations of the big five with subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 83(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12081
54.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
55.
TaberK. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
56.
TartagliaS.BergagnaE. (2022). Social networking sites passive use and its effects on sad-happy mood. Psihologija, 55, 137–148. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI201002008T
57.
TomaC. L.HancockJ. T. (2013). Self-affirmation underlies Facebook use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212474694
58.
TrifiroB. M.GersonJ. (2019). Social media usage patterns: Research note regarding the lack of universal validated measures for active and passive use. Social Media + Society, 5(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119848743
59.
TuckA. B.ThompsonR. J. (2021). Social networking site use during the COVID-19 pandemic and its associations with social and emotional well-being in college students: Survey study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(9), e26513. https://doi.org/10.2196/26513
60.
TurelO.SerenkoA. (2012). The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(5), 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.1
61.
ValkenburgP. M.BeyensI.PouwelsJ. L.van DrielI. I.KeijsersL. (2022). Social media browsing and adolescent well-being: Challenging the “passive social media use hypothesis.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 271(1), zmab015. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab015
62.
ValkenburgP. M.van DrielI. I.BeyensI. (2022). The associations of active and passive social media use with well-being: A critical scoping review. New Media & Society, 24(2), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211065425
63.
VerbeijT.PouwelsJ. L.BeyensI.ValkenburgP. M. (2021). The accuracy and validity of self-reported social media use measures among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100090
64.
VerbeijT.PouwelsJ. L.BeyensI.ValkenburgP. M. (2022). Experience sampling self-reports of social media use have comparable predictive validity to digital trace measures. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 7611. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11510-3
65.
VerduynP.GugushviliN.MassarK.TähtK.KrossE. (2020). Social comparison on social networking sites. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.002
66.
VerduynP.YbarraO.RésiboisM.JonidesJ.KrossE. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033
67.
WangJ.-L.GaskinJ.RostD. H.GentileD. A. (2018). The reciprocal relationship between passive Social Networking Site (SNS) usage and users’ subjective well-being. Social Science Computer Review, 36(5), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317721981
68.
WeinsteinE. (2018). The social media see-saw: Positive and negative influences on adolescents’ affective well-being. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3597–3623. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755634
69.
WilloughbyJ. F.MyrickJ. G.GibbonsS.KoganC. (2020). Associations between emotions, social media use, and sun exposure among young women: Ecological momentary assessment study. JMIR Dermatology, 3(1), e18371. https://doi.org/10.2196/18371
70.
WirtzD.TuckerA.BriggsC.SchoemannA. M. (2021). How and why social media affect subjective well-being: Multi-site use and social comparison as predictors of change across time. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 1673–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00291-z
71.
WuH.LeungS. O. (2017). Can Likert scales be treated as interval scales? A simulation study. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775
72.
WuH.-Y.ChiouA. F. (2020). Social media usage, social support, intergenerational relationships, and depressive symptoms among older adults. Geriatric Nursing, 41(5), 615–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.03.016
73.
ZhuX.BaoZ. (2018). Why people use social networking sites passively: An empirical study integrating impression management concern, privacy concern, and SNS fatigue. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2017-0270
74.
ZuckermanM. (2007). The Sensation Seeking Scale V (SSS-V): Still reliable and valid. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1303–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.021
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
