Measuring Compulsivity as a Self-Reported Multidimensional Transdiagnostic Construct: Large-Scale ( N = 182,000) Validation of the Cambridge

Abstract

Compulsivity has potential transdiagnostic relevance to a range of psychiatric disorders, but it has not been well-characterized and there are few existing measures available for measuring the construct across clinical and nonclinical samples that have been validated at large population scale. We aimed to characterize the multidimensional latent structure of self-reported compulsivity in a population-based sample of British children and adults (N = 182,145) using the Cambridge–Chicago Compulsivity Trait Scale (CHI-T). Exploratory structural equation modeling provided evidence for a correlated two-factor model consisting of (a) Perfectionism and (b) Reward Drive dimensions. Evidence was obtained for discriminant validity in relation to the big five personality dimensions and acceptable test–retest reliability. The CHI-T, here validated at extremely large scale, is suitable for use in studies seeking to understand the correlates and basis of compulsivity in clinical and nonclinical participants. We provide extensive normative data to facilitate interpretation in future studies.

Keywords

compulsivity transdiagnostic dimensional phenotype perfectionism reward drive psychopathology exploratory structural equation modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albertella

Chamberlain

S. R.

Le Pelley

M. E.

Greenwood

L. M.

Lee

R. S.

Den Ouden

… Yucel

(2020). Compulsivity is measurable across distinct psychiatric symptom domains and is associated with familial risk and reward-related attentional capture. CNS Spectrums, 25(4), 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852919001330

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204

Asparouhov

Muthen

Morin

A. J. S.

(2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: Comments on Stromeyer et al. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1561–1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315591075

Bagozzi

R. P.

(2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34.

Bentler

P. M.

Bonett

D. G.

(1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 588–606.

Berlin

G. S.

Hollander

(2014). Compulsivity, impulsivity, and the DSM-5 process. CNS Spectrums, 19(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852913000722

Bollen

K. A.

Noble

M. D.

(2011). Structural equation models and the quantification of behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(Supplement 3), 15639–15646. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010661108

Bornovalova

M. A.

Choate

A. M.

Fatimah

Petersen

K. J.

Wiernik

B. M.

(2020). Appropriate use of bifactor analysis in psychopathology research: Appreciating benefits and limitations. Biological Psychiatry, 88(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.01.013

10.

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). SAGE.

11.

Chamberlain

S. R.

Grant

J. E.

(2018). Initial validation of a transdiagnostic compulsivity questionnaire: The Cambridge–Chicago Compulsivity Trait Scale. CNS Spectrums, 23(5), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852918000810

12.

Chamberlain

S. R.

Leppink

E. W.

Redden

S. A.

Grant

J. E.

(2016). Are obsessive–compulsive symptoms impulsive, compulsive or both? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 68(Supplement C), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.04.010

13.

Chamberlain

S. R.

Tiego

Fontenelle

L. F.

Hook

Parkes

Segrave

… Yucel

(2019). Fractionation of impulsive and compulsive trans-diagnostic phenotypes and their longitudinal associations. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 53(9), 896–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419844325

14.

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

15.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007sem0902_5

16.

Chye

Suo

Romero-Garcia

Bethlehem

R. A. I.

Hook

Tiego

…Chamberlain

S. R.

(2022). Examining the relationship between altered brain functional connectome and disinhibition across 33 impulsive and compulsive behaviours. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 220(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.49

17.

Clark

L. A.

Watson

(2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412–1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626

18.

Costello

A. B.

Osborne

J. W.

(2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

19.

Cross

C. P.

Copping

L. T.

Campbell

(2011). Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 97–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021591

20.

Cuthbert

B. N.

(2014). The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 13(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20087

21.

Cuthbert

B. N.

Insel

T. R.

(2013). Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Medicine, 11, Article 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-126

22.

Cyders

M. A.

Smith

G. T.

(2008). Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: Positive and negative urgency. Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013341

23.

Dalley

J. W.

Everitt

B. J.

Robbins

T. W.

(2011). Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control. Neuron, 69(4), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.020

24.

Edelen

M. O.

Thissen

Teresi

J. A.

Kleinman

Ocepek-Welikson

(2006). Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach: Application to the Mini-Mental State Examination. Medical Care, 44(11), S134–S142.

25.

Enders

C. K.

(2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.

26.

Fattore

Melis

(2016). Sex differences in impulsive and compulsive behaviors: A focus on drug addiction. Addiction Biology, 21(5), 1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12381

27.

Feingold

(1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429

28.

Figee

Pattij

Willuhn

Luigjes

van den Brink

Goudriaan

… Denys

(2016). Compulsivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder and addictions. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(5), 856–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.003

29.

Fineberg

N. A.

Chamberlain

S. R.

Goudriaan

A. E.

Stein

D. J.

Vanderschuren

L. J. M. J.

Gillan

C. M.

… Potenza

M. N.

(2014). New developments in human neurocognition: Clinical, genetic, and brain imaging correlates of impulsivity and compulsivity. CNS Spectrums, 19(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852913000801

30.

Fineberg

N. A.

Potenza

M. N.

Chamberlain

S. R.

Berlin

H. A.

Menzies

Bechara

… Hollander

(2010). Probing compulsive and impulsive behaviors, from animal models to endophenotypes: A narrative review. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.185

31.

Finney

S. J.

DiStefano

(2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In Hancock

G. R.

Mueller

R. O.

(Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439–492). IAP Information Age Publishing.

32.

Galvan

Hare

Voss

Glover

Casey

(2007). Risk-taking and the adolescent brain: Who is at risk? Developmental Science, 10(2), F8–F14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00579.x

33.

Gillan

C. M.

Daw

N. D.

(2016). Taking psychiatry research online. Neuron, 91(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.002

34.

Gillan

C. M.

Fineberg

N. A.

Robbins

T. W.

(2017). A trans-diagnostic perspective on obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychological Medicine, 47(9), 1528–1548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716002786

35.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.

36.

Goodboy

A. K.

Kline

R. B.

(2017). Statistical and practical concerns with published communication research featuring structural equation modeling. Communication Research Reports, 34(1), 68–77.

37.

Graham

J. W.

(2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530

38.

Grevenstein

(2020). Factorial validity and measurement invariance across gender groups of the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 2(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-020-00015-2

39.

Griffin

S. A.

Suzuki

Lynam

D. R.

Crego

Widiger

T. A.

Miller

J. D.

Samuel

D. B.

(2018). Development and examination of the Five-Factor Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory–Short Form. Assessment, 25(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116643818

40.

Guo

Marsh

H. W.

Parker

P. D.

Dicke

Lüdtke

Diallo

T. M. O.

(2019). A systematic evaluation and comparison between exploratory structural equation modeling and Bayesian structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(4), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1554999

41.

Gutiérrez-Zotes

J. A.

Gutiérrez

Valero

Gallego

Baillés

Torres

… Livesley

W. J.

(2008). Structure of personality pathology in normal and clinical samples: Spanish validation of the DAPP-BQ. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22(4), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2008.22.4.389

42.

Hampshire

Hellyer

P. J.

Soreq

Mehta

M. A.

Ioannidis

Trender

… Chamberlain

S. R.

(2021). Associations between dimensions of behaviour, personality traits, and mental-health during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Nature Communications, 12(1), Article 4111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24365-5

43.

Hayes

A. F.

Coutts

J. J.

(2020). Use Omega rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for estimating reliability. But. . .. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629

44.

Hollander

(1993). Obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders: An overview. Psychiatric Annals, 23(7), 355–358.

45.

Hollander

Benzaquen

D. S.

(1997). The obsessive compulsive spectrum disorders. International Review of Psychiatry, 9(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540269775628

46.

Hollander

Rosen

(2002). Obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders: A review. In Maj

Sartorius

Okasha

Zohar

(Eds.), Obsessive-compulsive disorder (2nd ed., pp. 203–224). Wiley.

47.

Hook

R. W.

Grant

J. E.

Ioannidis

Tiego

Yücel

Wilkinson

Chamberlain

S. R.

(2021). Trans-diagnostic measurement of impulsivity and compulsivity: A review of self-report tools. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 120, 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.007

48.

Howard

M. C.

(2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664

49.

IBM Corp. (2020, Released). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows (Version 27.0).

50.

Ioannidis

Hook

Wickham

Grant

J. E.

Chamberlain

S. R.

(2019). Impulsivity in gambling disorder and problem gambling: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 44(8), 1354–1361. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0393-9

51.

Jin

(2020). A note on the cutoff values of alternative fit indices to evaluate measurement invariance for ESEM models. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419866911

52.

John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

Pervin

L. A.

(2010). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. Guilford Press.

53.

John

O. P.

Srivastava

(1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In John

O. P.

Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.

54.

Jöreskog

K. G.

(2006). Lisrel. Wiley.

55.

Kline

R. B.

(2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

56.

Krueger

R. F.

Derringer

Markon

K. E.

Watson

Skodol

A. E.

(2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291711002674

57.

Lang

K. M.

Little

T. D.

(2016). Principled missing data treatments. Prevention Science, 19(3), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0644-5

58.

Liang

Yang

Cao

(2020). The performance of ESEM and BSEM in structural equation models with ordinal indicators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(6), 874–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1716770

59.

Livesley

W. J.

Jackson

D. N.

(2009). Manual for the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology–Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ). Sigma Assessment Systems.

60.

Luigjes

Lorenzetti

de Haan

Youssef

G. J.

Murawski

Sjoerds

… Yücel

(2019). Defining compulsive behavior. Neuropsychology Review, 29(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09404-9

61.

Markon

K. E.

(2019). Bifactor and hierarchical models: Specification, inference, and interpretation. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095522

62.

Marsh

H. W.

(2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychology. In Tenenbaum

Eklund

R. C.

(Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 774–798). Wiley.

63.

Marsh

H. W.

Hau

K. T.

Wen

(2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2

64.

Marsh

H. W.

Ludtke

Muthen

Asparouhov

Morin

A. J.

Trautwein

Nagengast

(2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019227

65.

Marsh

H. W.

Morin

A. J. S.

Parker

P. D.

Kaur

(2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700

66.

Marsh

H. W.

Muthen

Asparouhov

Ludtke

Robitzsch

Morin

A. J. S.

Trautwein

(2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 439–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220

67.

Meredith

(1993). Measurement invariance, factor-analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf02294825

68.

Morris

L. S.

Voon

(2016). Dimensionality of cognitions in behavioral addiction. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 3(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-016-0068-3

69.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).

70.

Oltmanns

J. R.

Widiger

T. A.

(2018). A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The personality inventory for ICD-11. Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000459

71.

Pan

Wei

(2016). Fraction of missing information (γ) at different missing data fractions in the 2012 NAMCS Physician Workflow Mail Survey. Applied Mathematics, 7(10), 1057–1067. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.710093

72.

Parkes

Tiego

Aquino

Braganza

Chamberlain

S. R.

Fontenelle

L. F.

… Yucel

(2019). Transdiagnostic variations in impulsivity and compulsivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder and gambling disorder correlate with effective connectivity in cortical-striatal-thalamic-cortical circuits. Neuroimage, 202, Article 116070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116070

73.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, pp. 539–569.

74.

Preacher

K. J.

Coffman

D. L.

(2006). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org/

75.

Reise

S. P.

Bonifay

W. E.

Haviland

M. G.

(2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437

76.

Robbins

T. W.

Gillan

C. M.

Smith

D. G.

de Wit

Ersche

K. D.

(2012a). Neurocognitive endophenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity: Towards dimensional psychiatry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.009

77.

Robbins

T. W.

Gillan

C. M.

Smith

D. G.

de Wit

Ersche

K. D.

(2012b). Neurocognitive endophenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity: Towards dimensional psychiatry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.009

78.

Rodriguez

Reise

S. P.

Haviland

M. G.

(2016a). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249

79.

Rodriguez

Reise

S. P.

Haviland

M. G.

(2016b). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045

80.

Romero-Garcia

Hook

R. W.

Tiego

Bethlehem

R. A. I.

Goodyer

I. M.

Jones

P. B.

… Chamberlain

S. R.

(2021). Brain micro-architecture and disinhibition: A latent phenotyping study across 33 impulsive and compulsive behaviours. Neuropsychopharmacology, 46(2), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-020-00848-9

81.

Samuel

D. B.

Riddell

A. D.

Lynam

D. R.

Miller

J. D.

Widiger

T. A.

(2012). A five-factor measure of obsessive-compulsive personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.677885

82.

Sass

D. A.

Schmitt

T. A.

Marsh

H. W.

(2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658

83.

Savalei

Rhemtulla

(2012). On obtaining estimates of the fraction of missing information from full information maximum likelihood. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.687669

84.

Simms

L. J.

Goldberg

L. R.

Roberts

J. E.

Watson

Welte

Rotterman

J. H.

(2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.577475

85.

Simms

L. J.

Zelazny

Williams

T. F.

Bernstein

(2019). Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000648

86.

Spear

L. P.

(2000). The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(4), 417–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00014-2

87.

Stark

Chernyshenko

O. S.

Drasgow

(2006). Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1292–1306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292

88.

Tay

Meade

A. W.

Cao

(2015). An overview and practical guide to IRT measurement equivalence analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 18(1), 3–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114553062

89.

Tiego

Chamberlain

S. R.

Harrison

B. J.

Dawson

Albertella

Youssef

G. J.

… Yucel

(2020). Heritability of overlapping impulsivity and compulsivity dimensional phenotypes. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 14378. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71013-x

90.

Tiego

Oostermeijer

Prochazkova

Parkes

Dawson

Youssef

… Yucel

(2018). Overlapping dimensional phenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity explain co-occurrence of addictive and related behaviors. CNS Spectrums, 24(4), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852918001244

91.

Vandenberg

R. J.

(2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102005002001

92.

Vandenberg

R. J.

Lance

C. E.

(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002

93.

van den Heuvel

O. A.

van Wingen

Soriano-Mas

Alonso

Chamberlain

S. R.

Nakamae

… Veltman

D. J

. (2016). Brain circuitry of compulsivity. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(5), 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.005

94.

van Kampen

de Beurs

Andrea

. (2008). A short form of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ): The DAPP-SF. Psychiatry Research, 160(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.05.002

95.

Wright

A. G. C.

Simms

L. J.

(2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Personality Disorders, 5(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000037

96.

Yücel

Fontenelle

L. F.

(2012). Compulsivity as an endophenotype: The search for a hazy moving target. Addiction, 107(10), 1735–1736.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.32 MB

Measuring Compulsivity as a Self-Reported Multidimensional Transdiagnostic Construct: Large-Scale ( N = 182,000) Validation of the Cambridge–Chicago Compulsivity Trait Scale

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material