A challenge in the field of social and emotional learning is the lack of consensus regarding a framework to delineate key social and emotional skills (SE skills). Taking a conceptual approach, some have argued that the Big Five model from personality psychology offers a comprehensive framework to organize SE skills; however, little research has been done to empirically support this. In two studies—one using a factor analytic, data-driven approach, and one using an expert consensus approach—we provide multimethod evidence suggesting that there is a significant degree of overlap between SE skills and the Big Five, and we conclude that the Big Five can be used to organize SE skills.
AbrahamsL.PancorboG.PrimiR.SantosD.KyllonenP.JohnO. P.De FruytF. (2019). Social-emotional skill assessment in children and adolescents: Advances and challenges in personality, clinical, and educational contexts. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 460-473. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000591
2.
ACT. (2021). Mosaic™ by ACT®: Social emotional learning assessment. Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
4.
Benet-MartínezV.JohnO. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait–multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729
BoggT.RobertsB. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887-919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.887
7.
BurrusJ.BrennemanM. (2016). Psychosocial skills: Essential components of development and achievement in K-12. In LipnevichA. A.PreckelF.RobertsR. D. (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 3-27). Springer.
8.
CasillasA.WayJ.BurrusJ. (2015). Behavioral skills. In O’ConnorR.CamaraW.MatternK.HansonM. A. (Eds.), Beyond academics: A holistic framework for enhancing education and workplace success (pp. 25-38). ACT.
9.
ChernyshenkoO.KankarašM.DrasgowF. (2018). Social and emotional skills for student success and wellbeing: Conceptual framework for the OECD study on social and emotional skills. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/db1d8e59-en
10.
CiprianoC.TaylorJ. J.WeissbergR.BlythD.McKownC. (2020). Catalyzing future directions of SEL assessment. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
11.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412-1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626
CredéM.TynanM. C.HarmsP. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 492-511. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000102
14.
CronbachL. J.GleserG. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions (2nd ed.). University of Illinois Press.
15.
CrowderM. K.GordonR. A.BrownR. D.DavidsonL. A.DomitrovichC. E. (2019). Linking social and emotional learning standards to the WCSD Social-Emotional Competency Assessment: A Rasch approach. School Psychology, 34(3), 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000308
16.
de RaadB.MlačićB. (2015). The lexical foundation of the Big Five-Factor Model. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 191-216). Oxford University Press.
17.
DeYoungC. G.PetersonJ. B.HigginsD. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825-858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00330.x
18.
GiordanoC.OnesD. S.ViswesvaranC. (2018). Integrity testing and counterproductive work behavior. In CarducciB. J.MioJ. S.RiggioR. E. (Eds.), Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of personality and individual differences: Vol. IV. Clinical, applied, and cross-cultural research (pp. 539-544). John Wiley.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 3(1), 424-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
23.
HudsonN. W.BrileyD. A.ChopikW. J.DerringerJ. (2019). You have to follow through: Attaining behavioral change goals predicts volitional personality change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(4), 839-857. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000221
24.
JacksonJ. J.WoodD.BoggT.WaltonK. E.HarmsP. D.RobertsB. W. (2010). What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 501-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.06.005
25.
JanuzziJ. L.Jr.AhmadT.BinderL. G.HuckerW. J.KumbhaniD. J.MaddoxT. M.MarineJ. E.MorrisP. B. (2019). 2019 Methodology for creating expert consensus decision pathways. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 74(8), 1138-1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.035
26.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114-158). Guilford Press.
27.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). Guilford Press.
28.
JormA. F. (2015). Using the Delphi expert consensus method in method health research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49(10), 887-897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415600891
KotovR.GamezW.SchmidtF.WatsonD. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768-821. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020327
31.
KotovR.KruegerR. F.WatsonD.AchenbachT. M.AlthoffR. R.BagbyR. M.BrownT. A.CarpenterW. T.CaspiA.ClarkL. A.EatonN. R.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.GoldbergD.HasinD.HymanS. E.IvanovaM. Y.LynamD. R.MarkonK.. . . ZimmermanM. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454-477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258
32.
KyllonenP. C.LipnevichA. A.BurrusJ.RobertsR. D. (2014). Personality, motivation, and college readiness: A prospectus for assessment and development. Educational Testing Service.
33.
LipnevichA. A.PreckelF.RobertsR. D. (2016). Psychosocial constructs: Knowns, unknowns, and where do we go from here? In LipnevichA. A.PreckelF.RobertsR. D. (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 375-394). Springer.
34.
LynamD. R.WidigerT. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(3), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.401
35.
MahoneyJ. L.DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P. (2019). An update on social and emotional learning outcome research. Phi Beta Kappan, 100(4), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718815668
36.
MartinJ. E.MentenA.WaltonK. E.BurrusJ.Anguiano-CarrascoC.OlaruG.RobertsR. D. (2019). A Rosetta Stone for social and emotional skills: Using the Big Five personality factors to understand, assess, and enhance social and emotional skills in primary and secondary education worldwide. Asia Society & ACT, Inc. https://asiasociety.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/A_Rosetta_Stone_for_SEL_AS-ACT.pdf
37.
McCraeR. R.TerraccianoA., & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547-561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
38.
NyeC. D.DrasgowF. (2011). Assessing goodness of fit: Simple rules of thumb simply do not work. Organizational Research Methods, 14(3), 548-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110368562
39.
PierceM.HopeH.FordT.HatchS.HotopfM.JohnA.KontopantelisE.WebbR.WesselyS.McManusS.AbelK. M. (2020). Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7, 883-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4
40.
PoropatA. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
41.
PrimiR.SantosD.JohnO. P.De FruytF. (2016). Development of an inventory assessing social and emotional skills in Brazilian youth. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000343
42.
RobertsB. W.LuoJ.BrileyD. A.ChowP.SuR.HillP. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117-141. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000088
43.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
44.
SamuelD. B.LynamD. R.WidigerT. A.BallS. A. (2012). An expert consensus approach to relating proposed DSM-5 types and traits. Personality Disorders, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023787
45.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the Five-Factor Model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(8), 1326-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002
46.
SaulsmanL. M.PageA. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1055-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001
SimmsL. J.WatsonD. (2007). The construct validation approach to personality scale construction. In RobinsR.FraleyC.KruegerR. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 240-258). Guilford Press.
49.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.002
50.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2014). Traits in transition: The structure of parent-reported personality traits from early childhood to early adulthood. Journal of Personality, 82(3), 182-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12044
51.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 718-737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718
52.
SotoC. J.NapolitanoC. M.RobertsB. W. (2021). Taking skills seriously: Toward an integrative model and agenda for behavioral, emotional, and social skills. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420978613
53.
StyckK. M.MaleckiC. K.OggJ.DemarayM. K. (2021). Measuring COVID-19-related stress among 4th through 12th grade students. School Psychology Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1857658
54.
WeissbergR. P.DurlakJ. A.DomitrovichC. E.GullottaT. P. (2015). Social and emotional learning: Past, present, and future. In DurlakJ. A.DomitrovichC. E.WeissbergR. P.GullottaT. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 3-19). The Guilford Press.
55.
ZennerC.Herrnleben-KurzS.WalachH. (2014). Mindfulness-based interventions in schools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 603.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
