Coercive control is defined as the systematic use of demands, threats, and surveillance behaviors to gain control over an individual. Content validity appears to be an issue for existing measures of coercive control tactics, as they do not assess all of these behaviors. This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Demand, Threat, Surveillance, and Response to Demands subscales of the Coercion in Intimate Partner Relationships (CIPR) scale. Participants (N = 541) completed online measures of coercive control, physical intimate partner violence, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology. Confirmatory factor analyses, linear regressions, and correlational analyses investigated the construct (i.e., concurrent, convergent, and discriminant) validity of the CIPR subscales. Internal consistency of the subscales and test–retest reliability were also examined. Results provided support for the validity and reliability of the CIPR. Implications and usage of the CIPR in research and practice are discussed. We report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions, all manipulations, and all measures in the study.
ArmstrongT. G.WernkeJ. Y.MedinaK. L.SchaferJ. (2002). Do partners agree about the occurrence of intimate partner violence? A review of the current literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3(3), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380020033002
4.
AttalaJ. M.HudsonW. W.McSweenyM. (1994). A partial validation of two short-form partner abuse scales. Women & Health, 21(2-3), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v21n02_08
5.
BlevinsC.WeathersF.DavisM.WitteT.DominoJ. (2015). The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28(6), 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22059
6.
Bubriski-McKenzieA.JasinskiJ. (2013). Mental health effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence among Black and Hispanic women. Violence Against Women, 19(12), 1429-1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213517515
7.
CicchettiD. V.SparrowS. A. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86(2), 127-137. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7315877
8.
CokerA. L.DavisK. E.AriasI.DesaiS.SandersonM.BrandtH. M.SmithP. H. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00514-7
9.
DayA.BowenE. (2015). Offending competency and coercive control in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 20(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.12.004
10.
DuttonM. A.GoodmanL. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52(11-12), 743-756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4196-6
11.
DuttonM. A.GoodmanL.TerrellD.SchmidtR. J.FujimotoA. (2007). Coercion in Intimate Partner Relationships (CPR): A measure of demands, surveillance, coercive tactics, and behavioral response to coercive tactics. Final report submitted to National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
12.
FawsonP. (2015). Controlling behaviors as a predictor of partner violence among heterosexual female and male adolescents. Partner Abuse, 6(2), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.6.2.217
13.
FranklandA.BrownJ. (2014). Coercive control in same-sex intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 29(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9558-1
14.
FrenchJ. R. P.Jr.RavenB. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 118-149). University of Michigan Press.
15.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2005). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 12.0 update (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
16.
Graham-KevanN.ArcherJ. (2005). Investigating three explanations of women’s relationship aggression. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(3), 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00221.x
17.
HambergerK.LarsenS.LehrnerA. (2017). Coercive control in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.08.003
HardestyJ.CrossmanK.HaselschwerdtM.RaffaelliM.OgolskyB.JohnsonM. (2015). Toward a standard approach to operationalizing coercive control and classifying violence types. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 833-843. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12201
20.
JohnsonM. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(2), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.2307/353683
21.
JohnsonM. P.LeoneJ. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26(3), 322-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X04270345
22.
JonesM. (2020). Exploring coercive control, PTSD, and the use of physical violence in the pre-prison heterosexual relationships of incarcerated women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(10), 1299-1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820920661
23.
LehmannP.SimmonsC.PillaiV. (2012). The validation of the Checklist of Controlling Behaviors: Assessing coercive control in abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 18(8), 913-933. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212456522
24.
LevineA.FritzP. (2016). Coercive control, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression among homeless women. Partner Abuse, 7(1), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.7.1.26
25.
LovestadS.LoveJ.VaezM.KrantzG. (2017). Prevalence of intimate partner violence and its association with symptoms of depression: A cross-sectional study based on a female population sample in Sweden. BioMed Central Public Health, 17(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4222-y
26.
PituchK. A.StevensJ. P. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge.
27.
PolicastroC.FinnM. (2017). Coercive control and physical violence in older adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(3), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515585545
RushJ.TrivediM.IbrahimH.CarmodyT.ArnowB.KleinD.MarkowitzJ.NinanP.KornsteinS.ManberR.ThaseM.KocsisJ.KellerM. (2003). The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), Clinician rating (QIDS-C), and Self-Report (QIDS-SR): A psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biological Psychiatry, 54(5), 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(03)01866-
30.
SargentK. S.JourilesE. N.RosenfieldD.McDonaldR. (2017). A high school based evaluation of TakeCARE, a video bystander program to prevent adolescent relationship violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(3), 633-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0622-z
31.
StrausM.HambyS.Boney-MccoyS.SugarmanD. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001
32.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
33.
TanhaM.BeckC. J. A.FigueredoA. J.RaghavanC. (2010). Sex differences in intimate partner violence and the use of coercive control as a motivational factor for intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(10), 1836-1854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354501
34.
Terrazas-CarrilloE.McWhirterC.MartelP. (2016). Depression among Mexican women: The impact of nonviolent coercive control, intimate partner violence and employment status. Journal of Family Violence, 31(6), 721-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9827-x
35.
TrivediM.RushA.IbrahimH.CarmodyT.BiggsM.SuppesT.CrismonM.Shores-WilsonK.TopracM.DennehyE.WitteB.KashnerT. (2004). The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: A psychometric evaluation. Psychological Medicine, 34(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291703001107
36.
TropeY.FergusonM.RaghunathanR. (2001). Mood as a resource in processing self-relevant information. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 256-274). Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
WeathersF. W.LitzB. T.KeaneT. M.PalmieriP. A.MarxB. P.SchnurrP. P. (2013). The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)—Standard [Measurement instrument]. http://www.ptsd.va.gov/
38.
WhitakerM. (2013). Centrality of control seeking in men’s intimate partner violence perpetration. Prevention Science, 14(5), 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109913519790
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
