Empathy is essential for social functioning and is relevant to a host of clinical conditions. This COSMIN review evaluated the empirical support for empathy self-report measures used with autistic and nonautistic adults. Given autism is characterized by social differences, it is the subject of a substantial proportion of empathy research. Therefore, this review uses autism as a lens through which to scrutinize the psychometric quality of empathy measures. Of the 19 measures identified, five demonstrated “High-Quality” evidence for “Insufficient” properties and cannot be recommended. The remaining 14 had noteworthy gaps in evidence and require further evaluation before use with either group. Without tests of measurement invariance or differential item functioning, the extent to which observed group differences represent actual trait differences remains unknown. Using autism as a test case highlights an alarming tendency for empathy measures to be used to characterize, and potentially malign vulnerable populations before sufficient validation.
AllisonC.Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. J.StoneM. H.MuncerS. J. (2011). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 51(7), 829-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.005
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Author.
ArgottP. J.TownsendD. B.PoulsonC. L. (2017). Acquisition and generalization of complex empathetic responses among children with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0171-7
7.
AuyeungB.WheelwrightS.AllisonC.AtkinsonM.SamarawickremaN.Baron-CohenS. (2009). The Children’s Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient: Sex differences in typical development and in Autism Spectrum Conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(11), 1509-1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0772-x
8.
BaileyP. E.HenryJ. D.Von HippelW. (2008). Empathy and social functioning in late adulthood. Aging & Mental Health, 12(4), 499-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607860802224243
9.
BakerD. K. (2006). Neurodiversity, neurological disability and the public sector: Notes on the autism spectrum. Disability & Society, 21(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590500373734
10.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
11.
BatchelderL.BrosnanM.AshwinC. (2017). The development and validation of the Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ). PLOS ONE, 12(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169185
12.
BeardonL. (2008). Asperger Syndrome and perceived offending conduct: A qualitative study [Doctoral dissertation]. Sheffield Hallam University. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/7155/
13.
BirdG.VidingE. (2014). The self to other model of empathy: Providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 47(November), 520-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.021
14.
BlankeE. S.RauersA.RiedigerM. (2016). Does being empathic pay off? Associations between performance-based measures of empathy and social adjustment in younger and older women. Emotion, 16(5), 671-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000166
BurksD. J.KobusA. M. (2012). The legacy of altruism in health care: The promotion of empathy, prosociality and humanism. Medical Education, 46(3), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04159.x
CasciaJ.BarrJ. J. (2017). Associations among vocabulary, executive function skills and empathy in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(4), 627-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12257
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
23.
DethierV.BruneauN.PhilippotP. (2015). Attentional focus during exposure in spider phobia: The role of schematic versus non-schematic imagery. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 65(February), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.016
24.
Di GiuntaL.EisenbergN.KupferA.StecaP.TramontanoC.CapraraG. V. (2010). Assessing perceived empathic and social self-efficacy across countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000012.
25.
DziobekI.RogersK.FleckS.BahnemannM.HeekerenH. R.WolfO. T.ConvitA. (2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger Syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 464-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x
26.
ElliottR.BohartA. C.WatsonJ. C.MurphyD. (2018). Therapist empathy and client outcome: An updated meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000175
27.
ErolA.KirdokA. A.ZorluN.PolatS.MeteL. (2017). Empathy, and its relationship with cognitive and emotional functions in alcohol dependency. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 71(3), 205-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2016.1263683
GoldR.FaustM.GoldsteinA. (2010). Semantic integration during metaphor comprehension in Asperger Syndrome. Brain and Language, 113(3), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.002
30.
GoldingayS.StagnittiK.SheppardL.McGillivrayJ.McLeanB.PepinG. (2013). An intervention to improve social participation for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: Pilot study. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 18(2), 122-130. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2013.855275
31.
GrahamH. E. (2017, May). Who is the fairest of them all: The development and validation of the Just Leader measure [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Texas. https://rc.library.uta.edu/uta-ir/handle/10106/26790
32.
GrühnD.RebucalK.DiehlM.LumleyM.Labouvie-ViefG. (2008). Empathy across the adult lifespan: Longitudinal and experience-sampling findings. Emotion, 8(6), 753-765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014123
33.
HarrisonJ. L.IrelandM.PiovesanaA. M.BrownlowC. (2019, June20-23). Empathy measurement in autism [Paper presentation]. Asia Pacific Autism Conference, Sentosa Island, Singapore.
34.
HoffmannF.KoehneS.SteinbeisN.DziobekI.SingerT. (2016). Preserved self-other distinction during empathy in autism is linked to network integrity of right supramarginal gyrus. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 637-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2609-0
35.
HoganR. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027580
36.
HolzhauerC. G.WemmS.WulfertE. (2017). Distress tolerance and physiological reactivity to stress predict women’s problematic alcohol use. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 25(3), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000116
37.
IngogliaS.CocoA. L.AlbieroP. (2016). Development of a Brief Form of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (B-IRI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(5), 461-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1149858
38.
JawaidA.RibyD. M.OwensJ.WhiteS. W.TararT.SchulzP. E. (2012). “Too withdrawn” or “too friendly”: Considering social vulnerability in two neuro-developmental disorders. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(4), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01452.x
39.
JohnsonS. A.FilliterJ. H.MurphyR. R. (2009). Discrepancies between self- and parent-perceptions of autistic traits and empathy in high functioning children and adolescents on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(12), 1706-1714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0809-1
KappS. K.Gillespie-LynchK.ShermanL. E.HutmanT. (2013). Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028353
43.
KlapwijkE. T.AghajaniM.ColinsO. F.MarijnissenG. M.PopmaA.van LangN. D. J.van der WeeN. J. A.VermeirenR. R. J. M. (2016). Different brain responses during empathy in autism spectrum disorders versus conduct disorder and callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(6), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12498
44.
KochS. C.MehlL.SobanskiE.SieberM.FuchsT. (2015). Fixing the mirrors: A feasibility study of the effects of dance movement therapy on young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 19(3), 338-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314522353
45.
KoehneS.BehrendsA.FairhurstM. T.DziobekI. (2016). Fostering social cognition through an imitation- and synchronization-based dance/movement intervention in adults with autism spectrum disorder: A controlled proof-of-concept study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441111
46.
KosonogovV. (2014). The psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Empathy Quotient. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 7(1), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2014.0110
47.
LawrenceE. J.ShawP.BakerD.Baron-CohenS.DavidA. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34(5), 911-924. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291703001624
48.
LyonsM. T.BrewerG.BethellE. J. (2017). Sex-specific effect of recalled parenting on affective and cognitive empathy in adulthood. Current Psychology, 36(2), 236-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9405-z
49.
MartinI.McDonaldS. (2004). An exploration of causes of non-literal language problems in individuals with Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(3), 311-328. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000029553.52889.15
50.
MathersulD.McDonaldS.RushbyJ. A. (2013). Understanding advanced theory of mind and empathy in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(6), 655-668. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2013.809700
51.
MelchersM.MontagC.MarkettS.ReuterM. (2015). Assessment of empathy via self-report and behavioural paradigms: Data on convergent and discriminant validity. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 20(2), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2014.991781
52.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Med, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
53.
MokkinkL. B.de VetH. C. W.PrinsenC. A. C.PatrickD. L.AlonsoJ.BouterL. M.TerweeC. B. (2018). COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171-1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
54.
MontgomeryC.AllisonC.LaiM.-C.CassidyS.LangdonP.Baron-CohenS. (2016). Do adults with high functioning autism or Asperger Syndrome differ in empathy and emotion recognition?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(6), 1931-1940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2698-4
55.
MuncerS. J.LingJ. (2006). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1111-1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.020
PaveyL.GreitemeyerT.SparksP. (2012). “I help because I want to, not because you tell me to”: Empathy increases autonomously motivated helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 681-689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211435940
60.
PrinsenC. A. C.MokkinkL. B.BouterL. M.AlonsoJ.PatrickD. L.de VetH. C. W.TerweeC. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
61.
ReniersR. L. E. P.CorcoranR.DrakeR.ShryaneN. M.VöllmB. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484
62.
RobinsonA.RobertE. (2016). Brief report: An observational measure of empathy for autism spectrum: A preliminary study of the development and reliability of the Client Emotional Processing Scale. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(6), 2240-2250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2727-3
63.
RogersK.DziobekI.HassenstabJ.WolfO. T.ConvitA. (2007). Who cares? Revisiting empathy in Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(4), 709-715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0197-8
64.
RuedaP.Fernández-BerrocalP.Baron-CohenS. (2015). Dissociation between cognitive and affective empathy in youth with Asperger Syndrome. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.950221
65.
RustJ.GolombokS. (2009). Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment (3rd ed.). Routledge.
SprengR. N.McKinnonM. C.MarR. A.LevineB. (2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381
68.
StocksE. L.LishnerD. A.DeckerS. K. (2009). Altruism or psychological escape: Why does empathy promote prosocial behavior?European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.561
TerweeC. B.PrinsenC. A. C.ChiarottoA.WestermanM. J.PatrickD. L.AlonsoJ.BouterL. M.de VetH. C. W.MokkinkL. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1159-1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
71.
TrimmerE.McDonaldS.RushbyJ. A. (2017). Not knowing what I feel: Emotional empathy in autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 21(4), 450-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316648520
72.
WakabayashiA.Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.GoldenfeldN.DelaneyJ.FineD.SmithR.WeilL. (2006). Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 929-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.017
YanE. G.MunirK. M. (2004). Regulatory and ethical principles in research involving children and individuals with developmental disabilities. Ethics & Behavior, 14(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1401_3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
