Empathy, the ability to infer and share others’ affective states, plays a vital role in social interactions. However, no existing scale comprehensively assesses empathy’s cognitive and affective components across positive and negative emotional valence domains. This article explores the latent structure of the empathy construct and attempts to remedy past measurement limitations by developing and validating a new 20-item self-report measure, the Perth Empathy Scale (PES). In Study 1 (N = 316), factor analyses revealed a coherent empathy construct comprised of cognitive and valence-specific affective components. Study 2 (N = 331) replicated this factor structure, showed measurement invariance between males and females, and highlighted the importance of assessing negative and positive emotions in empathy. The PES showed convergent and discriminant validity from comparisons with alexithymia and other empathy measures. Overall, this article empirically establishes a conceptually clear structure of the multidimensional empathy construct, which the PES reliably and validly measures.
AndreychikM. R.MigliaccioN. (2015). Empathizing with others’ pain versus empathizing with others’ joy: Examining the separability of positive and negative empathy and their relation to different types of social behaviors and social emotions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(5), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1071256
2.
BanzhafC.HoffmannF.KanskeP.FanR.WalterH.SpenglerS.SchreiterS.SingerT.BermpohlF. (2018). Interacting and dissociable effects of alexithymia and depression on empathy. Psychiatry Research, 270, 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.045
3.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning Autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
4.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.LawsonJ.GriffinR.HillJ. (2002). The exact mind: Empathizing and systemizing in autism spectrum conditions. In GoswamiU. (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 491–508). Blackwell Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996652.ch22
5.
BatchelderL.BrosnanM.AshwinC. (2017). The development and validation of the empathy components questionnaire (ECQ). PLOS ONE, 12(1), Article e0169185. https://doi.org/10.1371.journal.pone.0169185
6.
BatsonC. D. (2010). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 15–34). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-001
7.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
8.
BirdG.VidingE. (2014). The self to other model of empathy: Providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.021
9.
BloomZ. D.LambieG. W. (2020). The adolescent measure of empathy and sympathy in a sample of emerging adults. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 53(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2019.1667243
10.
BrownS.HarkinsL.BeechA. R. (2012). General and victim-specific empathy: Associations with actuarial risk, treatment outcome, and sexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(5), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211423944
BukowskiH.TikM.SilaniG.RuffC. C.WindischbergerC.LammC. (2020). When differences matter: rTMS/fMRI reveals how differences in dispositional empathy translate to distinct neural underpinnings of self-other distinction in empathy. Cortex, 128, 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.009
13.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
14.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
15.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
16.
ChrysikouE. G.ThompsonW. J. (2016). Assessing cognitive and affective empathy through the interpersonal reactivity index: An argument against a two-factor model. Assessment, 23(6), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115599055
17.
ClarkA. J. (2010). Empathy and sympathy: Therapeutic distinctions in counselling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 32(2), 95–101.
18.
CollM.VidingE.RütgenM.SilaniG.LammC.CatmurC.BirdG. (2017). Are we really measuring empathy?Proposal for a New Measurement Framework. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 83, 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.009
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differencs in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
22.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
23.
DecetyJ.JacksonP. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
24.
DecetyJ.LammC. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. The Scientific World Journal, 6, 1146–1163. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.221
25.
DecetyJ.MichalskaK. J. (2010). Neurodevelopmental changes in the circuits underlying empathy and sympathy from childhood to adulthood. Developmental Science, 13(6), 886–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00940.x
26.
DecetyJ.MoriguchiY. (2007). The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: Implications for intervention across different clinical conditions. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 1, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-1-22
de WaalF. B. M. (2010). The age of empathy. Harmony Books.
30.
DziobekI.RogersK.FleckS.BahnemannM.HeekerenH. R.WolfO. T.ConvitA. (2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger Syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x
31.
EisenbergN.FabesR. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behaviour. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 131–149.
32.
EklundJ. H.MeraniusM. S. (2021). Toward a consensus on the nature of empathy: A review of reviews. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(2), 300–3007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.022
33.
EkmanP. (1999). Basic emotions. In DalgleishT.PowerM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). New York: Wiley.
34.
EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J. (1978). Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: Their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychological Reports, 43(3), 1247–1255. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1978.43.3f.1247
35.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.
36.
GerdesK. E.LietzC. A.SegaE. Z. (2011). Measuring empathy in the 21st century: Development of an empathy index rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. Social Work Research, 35(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.83
37.
GignacG. E. (2014). On the inappropriateness of using items to calculate total scale score reliability via coefficient for multidimensional scales. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000181
38.
GignacG. E. (2016). The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better. Intelligence, 55, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.01.006
39.
GignacG. E.SzodoraiE. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
40.
Groth-MarnatG. (2009). Handbook of psychological assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
41.
GrynbergD.LuminetO.CorneilleO.GrèzesJ.BerthozS. (2010). Alexithymia in the interpersonal domain: A general deficit of empathy?Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 845–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.013
42.
HeinG.SingerT. (2008). I feel how you feel but not always: The empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.012
43.
HoffmanM. L. (2008). Empathy and prosocial behaviour. In LewisM.Haiviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 440–455). The Guilford Press.
44.
HoganR. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027580
InnamoratiM.EbischJ. H.GalleseV.SagginoA. (2019). A bidimensional measure of empathy: Empathic experience scale. PLOS ONE, 14(4), Article e0216164. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216164
47.
JohnsonJ. E.BurlingameG. M.OlsenJ. A.DaviesD. R.GleaveR. L. (2005). Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group therapy: Multilevel structural equation models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.310
JordanM. R.AmirD.BloomP. (2016). Are empathy and concern psychologically distinct?Emotion, 16, 11071116. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000228
50.
JöreskogK. G.GoldbergerA. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(351), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.2307/2285946
51.
KhosravaniV.ArdestaniS. M. S.AlvaniA.AmirinezhadA. (2020). Alexithymia, empathy, negative affect and physical symptoms in patients with asthma. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 27(5), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2458
52.
KingS.Jr.HoloskoM. J. (2012). The development and initial validation of the empathy scale for social workers. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511417136
53.
LammC.BukowskiH.SilaniG. (2016). From shared to distinct self-other representations in empathy: Evidence from neurotypical function and socio-cognitive disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371, 20150083. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0083
54.
LawrenceE. J.ShawP.BakerD.Baron-CohenS.DavidA. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34(5), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291703001624
55.
LeiP.ShiverdeckerL. K. (2020). Performance of estimators for confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(4), 584–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1680292
56.
LietzC. A.GerdesK. E.SunF.GeigerJ. M.WagamanM. A.SegalE. A. (2011). The Empathy Assessment Index (EAI): A confirmatory factor analysis of a multidimensional model of empathy. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 2(2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2011.6
57.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
58.
MazzaM.PinoM. C.MarianoM.TempestaD.FerraraM.De BarardisD.MaseduF.ValentiM. (2014). Affective and cognitive empathy in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(8), 791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00791
59.
MorelliS. A.RamesonL. T.LiebermanM. D. (2014). The neural components of empathy: Predicting daily prosocial behaviour. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss088
60.
MorinJ. S.MarshH. W.NagengastB. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modelling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 395–436). Information Age Publishing.
61.
MorrisonA. S.MateenM. A.BrozovichF. A.ZakiJ.GoldinP. R.HeimbergR. G.GrossJ. J. (2016). Empathy for positive and negative emotions in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 87, 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.10.005
62.
MulC.StaggS. D.HerbelinB.AspellJ. E. (2018). The feeling of me feeling for you: Interoception, alexithymia and empathy in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(9), 2953–2967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3564-3
63.
MundfromD. J.ShawD. G.KeT. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
64.
MurphyB. A.CostelloT.WattsA.CheongY. F.BergJ.LilienfeldS. O. (2020). Strengths and weaknesses of two empathy measures: A comparison of the measurement precision, construct validity, and incremental validity of two multidimensional indices. Assessment, 27(2), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118777636
65.
MurphyB. A.LilienfeldS. O. (2019). Are self-report cognitive empathy ratings valid proxies for cognitive empathy ability? Negligible meta-analytic relations with behavioural task performance. Psychological Assessment, 31(8), 1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000732
66.
MuthénB. O. (1989). Latent variable modelling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54(4), 557–585.
MyersN. D.AhnS.JinY. (2011). Sample size and power estimates for a confirmatory factor analytic model in exercise and sport: A Monte Carlo approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599773
OlderbakS.SassenrathC.KellerJ.WilhelmO. (2014). An emotion-differentiated perspective on empathy with the emotion specific empathy questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 653. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00653
71.
PreeceD.BecerraR.AllanA.RobinsonK.DandyJ. (2017). Establishing the theoretical components of alexithymia via factor analysis: Introduction and validation of the attention-appraisal model of alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.003
72.
PreeceD.BecerraR.RobinsonK.DandyJ.AllanA. (2018). The psychometric assessment of alexithymia: Development and validation of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 132, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.011
73.
RaineA.ChenF. R. (2018). The cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scales (CASES) for children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 47(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1295383
74.
ReiseS. P.BonifayW.HavilandM. (2013). Scoring and modelling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
75.
ReniersR. L. E. P.CorcoranR.DrakeR.ShryaneN. M.VöllmB. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484
76.
RhemtullaM.Brosseau-LiardP. É.SavaleiV. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
77.
RodebaughT. L.WoodsC. M.HeimbergR. G. (2007). The reverse of social anxiety is not always the opposite: The reverse-scored items of the social interaction anxiety scale do not belong. Behavior Therapy, 38(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2006.08.001
78.
RyderA. G.SunoharaM.DereJ.Chentsova-DuttonY. E. (2018). The cultural shaping of alexithymia. In LuminetO.BagbyR. M.TaylorG. J. (Eds.), Alexithymia (1st ed., pp. 33–48). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241595.005
79.
Shamay-TsooryS. G.Aharon-PeretzJ.PerryD. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132(3), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn279
SmithA. (2009). The empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: A theoretical approach to cognitive and emotional empathy in autistic development. The Psychological Record, 59(2), 489–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395663
82.
SotoJ. A.PerezC. R.KimY. H.LeeE. A.MinnickM. R. (2011). Is expressive suppression always associated with poorer psychological functioning? A cross-cultural comparison between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion, 11(6), 1450–1455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023340
83.
SprengR. N.McKinnonM. C.MarR. A.LevineB. (2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381
StevensJ. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Erlbaum.
86.
VachonD. D.LynamD. R. (2016). Fixing the problem with empathy: Development and validation of the affective and cognitive measure of empathy. Assessment, 23(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114567941
87.
ValdespinoA.AntezanaL.GhaneM.RicherJ. A. (2017). Alexithymia as a transdiagnostic precursor to empathy abnormalities: The functional role of the insula. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02234
88.
van SonderenE.SandermanR.CoyneJ. C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLOS ONE, 8(7), Article e68967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068967
89.
VossenH. G. M.PiotrowskiJ. T.ValkenburgP. M. (2015). Development of the adolescent measure of empathy and sympathy (AMES). Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.040
90.
VrtickaP.LordierL.BediouB.SanderD. (2014). Human amygdala response to dynamic facial expressions of positive and negative surprise. Emotion, 14(1), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034619
91.
WattsA. L.PooreH. E.WaldmanI. D. (2019). Riskier tests of the validity of the bifactor model of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(6), 1285–1303. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619855035
92.
WolfE. R.HarringtonK. M.ClarkS. L.MillerM. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
93.
YangH.ShiH.NiK.WangY.CheungE. F. C.ChanR. K. C. (2020). Exploring the links between alexithymia, empathy and schizotypy in college students using network analysis. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 25(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2020.1749039
94.
ZakiJ.OchsnerK. N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 675–680. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3085
95.
ZiaeiM.OestreichL.ReutensD. C.EbnerN. C. (2021). Age-related differences in negative cognitive empathy but similarities in positive affective empathy. Brain Structure and Function, 226, 1823–1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02291-y
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
