With 20 items, the State Self-Esteem Scale (SSES) can be cumbersome in settings that demand efficiency. The present research created an efficient six-item version of the SSES that preserves score reliability and validity and its three-dimensional structure: social, appearance, and performance self-esteem. Item response theory and confirmatory factor analyses identified the “best” six items—two from each dimension (Study 1). Participants completed the SSES four times at 2-week intervals (Studies 2 and 3). The six-item SSES’ scores showed adequate test–retest reliability, explained substantial variance in trait-relevant measures, and showed convergent validity with related self-esteem measures. Participants completed the SSES and a laboratory experiment where they received negative feedback on an essay they had written and could retaliate against their evaluator by allocating hot sauce for them to consume (Study 4). The six-item SSES interacted with self-esteem instability in expected ways to predict hot sauce allocated.
AckermanT. A.GierlM. J.WalkerC. M. (2003). Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate educational and psychological tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(3), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00136.x
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
3.
AlickeM. D.KlotzM. L.BreitenbecherD. L.YurakT. J.VredenburgD. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 804-825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.804
4.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: What happened to actual behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
BushmanB. J.BaumeisterR. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.219
7.
ChesneyM. A.NeilandsT. B.ChambersD. B.TaylorJ. M.FolkmanS. (2006). A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11(3), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910705X53155
8.
ChristensenT. C.BarrettL. F.Bliss-MoreauE.LeboK.KaschubC. (2003). A practical guide to experience-sampling procedures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(1), 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023609306024
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.
11.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
12.
DonnellanM. B.OswaldF. L.BairdB. M.LucasR. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
13.
FleesonW. (2001). Toward a structure-and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011-1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011
FrenchS. A.PerryC. L.LeonG. R.FulkersonJ. A. (1996). Self-esteem and change in body mass index over 3 years in a cohort of adolescents. Obesity Research, 4(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1550-8528.1996.tb00509.x
16.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
17.
HeathertonT. F.PolivyJ. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 895-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895
HowellJ. L.ShepperdJ. A. (2016). Establishing an Information Avoidance Scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(12), 1695-1708. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000315
20.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
21.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
22.
JuddC. M.McClellandG. H.RyanC. S. (2017). Data analysis: A model comparison approach (3rd ed.). Routledge.
23.
KernisM. H.GrannemannB. D.BarclayL. C. (1989). Stability and level of self-esteem as predictors of anger arousal and hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(6), 1013-1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.1013
24.
KirkpatrickL. A.EllisB. J. (2001). An evolutionary approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In FletcherG. J. O.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2: Interpersonal processes (pp. 411-436). Blackwell. [Reprinted (2004) in BrewerM. B.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Self and social identity (pp. 52-77). Blackwell.] https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998557.ch16
25.
KirkpatrickL. A.WaughC. E.ValenciaA.WebsterG. D. (2002). The functional domain-specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 756-767. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.5.756
26.
KleinR. A.RatliffK. A.VianelloM.AdamsR. B.Jr.BahníkŠ.BernsteinM. J.BocianK.BrandtM. J.BrooksB.BrumbaughC. C.CemalcilarZ.ChandlerJ.CheongW.DavisW. E.DevosT.EisnerM.FrankowskaN.FurrowD.GallianiE. M.. . . NosekB. A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability. Social Psychology, 45(3), 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
27.
KleinR. A.VianelloM.HasselmanF.AdamsB. G.AdamsR. B.Jr.AlperS.AveyardM.AxtJ. R.BabalolaM. T.BahníkS.BatraR.BerkicsM.BernsteinM. J.BerryD. R.BialobrzeskaO.BinanE. D.BocianK.BrandtM. J.BuschingR.. . . NosekB. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
28.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
29.
KreftI. G. G.de LeeuwJ. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Sage.
30.
LeeI. A.PreacherK. J. (2013, September). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org
ManapatP. D.EdwardsM. C.MacKinnonD. P.PoldrackR. A.MarschL. A. (2019). A psychometric analysis of the Brief Self-Control Scale. Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119890021
34.
McClellandG. H.JuddC. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
35.
MorizotJ.AinsworthA. T.ReiseS. P. (2007). Toward modern psychometrics: Application of item response theory models in personality research. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 407-423). Guilford Press.
NezlekJ. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event-and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 771-785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277001
38.
NezlekJ. B.GableS. L. (2001). Depression as a moderator of relationships between positive daily events and day-to-day psychological adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12), 1692-1704. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012712012
39.
NezlekJ. B.PleskoR. M. (2001). Day-to-day relationships among self-concept clarity, self-esteem, daily events, and mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272006
40.
NicholsA. L.WebsterG. D. (2013). The Single-Item Need to Belong Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(2), 189-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.018
41.
NicholsA. L.WebsterG. D. (2015). Designing a brief measure of social anxiety: Psychometric support for a three-item version of the Interaction Anxiousness Scale (IAS-3). Personality and Individual Differences, 79(June), 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.043
42.
OkadaR. (2010). A meta-analytic review of the relation between self-esteem level and self-esteem instability. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2), 243-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.012
43.
PaulhusD. L.VazireS. (2007). The self-report method. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224-239). Guilford Press.
44.
RammstedtB.JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
45.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
46.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CongdonR. (2004). HLM 6 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
47.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
48.
RodriguezL. M.WebsterG. D. (2020). The Three-Item Thinking about Your Partner’s Drinking Scale (TPD-3): Item response theory, reliability, and validity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(3), 471-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12399
49.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
50.
SamejimaF. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 34(1), 1-97 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372160
51.
SamejimaF. (2016). Graded response models. In van der LindenW. J. (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory (Vol. 1, pp. 123-136). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315374512
52.
ScollonC. N.PrietoC. K.DienerE. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strength and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023605205115
WebsterG. D.CryselL. C. (2012). “Hit me, maybe, one more time”: Brief measures of impulsivity and sensation seeking and their prediction of blackjack bets and sexual promiscuity. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 591-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.07.001
55.
WebsterG. D.DeWallC. N.PondR. S.Jr.DeckmanT.JonasonP. K.LeB. M.NicholsA. L.SchemberT. O.CryselL. C.CrosierB. S.SmithC. V.PaddockE. L.NezlekJ. B.KirkpatrickL. A.BryanA. D.BatorR. J. (2014). The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Psychometric and behavioral evidence for an efficient measure of trait aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 40(2), 120-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21507
56.
WebsterG. D.DeWallC. N.PondR. S.Jr.DeckmanT.JonasonP. K.LeB. M.NicholsA. L.SchemberT. O.CryselL. C.CrosierB. S.SmithC. V.PaddockE. L.NezlekJ. B.KirkpatrickL. A.BryanA. D.BatorR. J. (2015). The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Structure, validity, reliability, and generalizability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(6), 638-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093
57.
WebsterG. D.JonasonP. K. (2013). Putting the “IRT” in “dirty”: Item response theory analyses of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen—an efficient measure of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 302-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.027
58.
WebsterG. D.KirkpatrickL. A. (2006). Behavioral and self-reported aggression as a function of domain-specific self-esteem. Aggressive Behavior, 32(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20102
59.
WebsterG. D.KirkpatrickL. A.NezlekJ. B.SmithC. V.PaddockE. L. (2007). Different slopes for different folks: Self-esteem instability and gender as moderators of the relationship between self-esteem and attitudinal aggression. Self and Identity, 6(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860600920488
60.
WebsterG. D.SmithC. V.BrunellA. B.PaddockE. L.NezlekJ. B. (2017). Can Rosenberg’s (1965) Stability of Self Scale capture within-person self-esteem variability? Meta-analytic validity and test–retest reliability. Journal of Research in Personality, 69(August), 156-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.005
61.
WidamanK. F.LittleT. D.PreacherK. J.SawalaniG. M. (2011). On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. In TrzesniewskiK. H.DonnellanM. B.LucasR. E. (Eds.), Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists (pp. 39-61). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12350-003
62.
YzerbytV. Y.MullerD.JuddC. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 424-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
