Validation of the Intention Attribution Test for Children (IAC)

Abstract

The Intention Attribution Test for Children (IAC) was created to assess hostile attribution bias in preschool- and early school-aged children. It comprises 16 cartoon strips presenting situations in which one character (either a child or an adult) causes harm to another, either intentionally, accidentally (nonintentional), or without his or her intention being clear (ambiguous). Its validity was tested on 233 children aged 4 to 12 years. Exploratory factor analysis and item response theory models demonstrated support for a single factor of hostile attribution bias for the ambiguous and nonintentional items. Analyses revealed, however, that the intentional items did not contribute to this same overall construct of hostile intention attribution bias. Correlations with the Social Perception Test and with sociometry suggest good validity of the IAC. The IAC may be a useful instrument for research and in the context of therapeutic intervention addressing socially inappropriate behavior in childhood.

Keywords

assessment social cognition hostile attribution bias development children

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carlson

S. M.

Claxton

L. J.

Moses

L. J.

(2015). The relation between executive function and theory of mind is more than skin deep. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 186-197. doi:10.1080/15248372.2013.824883

Cassidy

Asher

S. R.

(1992). Loneliness and peer relations in young children. Child Development, 63, 350-365. doi:10.2307/1131484

Chalmers

R. P.

(2012). mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1-29. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i06

Costello

A. B.

Osborne

J. W.

(2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.

Crick

N. R.

Dodge

K. A.

(1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74

Cushman

Sheketoff

Wharton

Carey

(2013). The development of intent-based moral judgment. Cognition, 127, 6-21. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008

Dick

A. S.

(2014). The development of cognitive flexibility beyond the preschool period: An investigation using a modified flexible item selection task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 125, 13-34. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.021

Dodge

K. A.

(2006). Translational science in action: Hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems. Developmental Psychopathology, 18, 791-814.

Dodge

K. A.

Frame

C. L.

(1982). Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys. Child Development, 53, 620-635. doi:10.2307/1129373

10.

Dodge

K. A.

Malone

P. S.

Lansford

J. E.

Sorbring

Skinner

A. T.

Tapanya

. . . Pastorelli

(2015). Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context. PNAS, 112, 9310-9315. doi:10.1073/pnas.1418572112

11.

Dodge

K. A.

Murphy

R. R.

Buchsbaum

(1984). The assessment of intention-cue detection skills in children: Implications for developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 163-173.

12.

Dodge

K. A.

Price

J. M.

(1994). On the relation between social information processing and socially competent behavior in early school-aged children. Child Development, 65, 1385-1397.

13.

Dodge

K. A.

Tomlin

A. M.

(1987). Utilization of self-schemas as a mechanism of interpretational bias in aggressive children. Social Cognition, 5, 280-300. doi:10.1521/soco.1987.5.3.280

14.

Feldman

Dodge

K. A.

(1987). Social information processing and sociometric status: Sex, age, and situational effects. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 211-227. doi:10.1007/BF00916350.

15.

Fitzgerald

Asher

S. R

. (1987). Aggressive-rejected children’s attributional biases about liked and disliked peers. In the 95th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York, NJ.

16.

Flavell

J. H.

(1999). Cognitive development: Children’s knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 21-45. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.21

17.

Flora

D. B.

Flake

J. K.

(2017). The purpose and practice of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in psychological research: Decisions for scale development and validation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 49(2), 78-88. doi:10.1037/cbs0000069

18.

Guerra

N. G.

Slaby

R. G.

(1989). Evaluative factors in social problem solving by aggressive boys. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 211-289. doi:10.1007/BF00917399

19.

Horn

J. L.

(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-85.

20.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118

21.

IBM. (2014). Introduction to structural equation modeling using IBM SPSS Amos (v22), Student Guide, Course Code: 0G203. New York, NY: IBM Corp.

22.

Keane

S. P.

Brown

K. P.

Crenshaw

T. M.

(1990). Children’s intention-cue detection as a function of maternal social behavior: Pathways to social rejection. Developmental Psychology, 26, 1004-1009.

23.

MacCallum

R. C.

Browne

M. W.

Sugawara

H. M.

(1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.

24.

Meganck

Markey

Vanheule

(2012). Reliability and factor structure in an adolescent sample of the Dutch 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Psychological Reports, 111, 393‑404. doi:10.2466/02.08.15.PR0.111.5.393-404

25.

Nagin

Tremblay

R. E.

(1999). Trajectories of boys’ physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Development, 70, 1181-1196.

26.

Nelson

D. A.

Crick

N. R.

(1999). Rose-colored glasses: Examining the social information-processing of prosocial young adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 17-38. doi:10.1177/0272431699019001002

27.

Parke

R. D.

Ladd

G. W.

(Eds.). (1992/2016). Family-peer relations: Modes of linkage. London, England: Taylor & Francis.

28.

Pettit

G. S.

Dodge

K. A.

Brown

M. M

. (1988). Early family experience, social problem solving patterns, and children’s social competence. Child Development, 59, 107-120.

29.

Preacher

K. J.

MacCallum

R. C.

(2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13-43. doi:10.1207/S15328031US0201_02

30.

Quiggle

N. L.

Garber

Panak

W. F.

Dodge

K. A.

(1992). Social information processing in aggressive and depressed children. Child Development, 63, 1305-1320. doi:10.2307/1131557

31.

R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

32.

Revelle

(2018). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych

33.

Robins

L. N.

(1978). Sturdy childhood predictors of adult antisocial behavior: Replication from longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine, 8, 611-622.

34.

Runions

K. C.

Keating

D. P.

(2007). Young children’s social information processing: Family antecedents and behavioral correlates. Developmental Psychology, 43, 838-849. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.838

35.

Suess

G. J.

Grossmann

K. E.

Sroufe

L. A.

(1992). Effects of infant attachment to mother and father on quality of adaptation in preschool: From dyadic to individual organization of self. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15, 43-65. doi:10.1177/016502549201500103

36.

Tran

U. S.

Formann

A. K.

(2009). Performance of parallel analysis in retrieving unidimensionality in the presence of binary data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 50-61. doi:10.1177/0013164408318761

37.

Villanueva

Clemente

R. A.

Garcia

F. J.

(2000). Theory of mind and peer rejection at school. Social Development, 9, 271-283.

38.

Waas

G. A.

(1988). Social attributional biases of peer-rejected and aggressive children. Child Development, 59, 969-992. doi:10.2307/1130263

39.

Wechsler

(2002). WPPSI-III. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Third edition. London: Pearson.

40.

Wechsler

(2003). WISC-IV. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth edition. London: Pearson.

41.

Weng

L. J.

Cheng

C. P.

(2005). Parallel analysis with unidimensional binary data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 697-716. doi:10.1177/0013164404273941

42.

Wolfe

K. R.

Vannatta

Nelin

M. A.

Yeates

K. O.

(2015). Executive functions, social information processing, and social adjustment in young children born with very low birth weight. Child Neuropsychology, 21, 41-54. doi:10.1080/09297049.2013.866217

43.

Woodward

A. L.

Sommerville

J. A.

Gerson

Henderson

A. M. E.

Buresh

(2009). The emergence of intention attribution in infancy. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 187-222. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51006-7

44.

Yagmurlu

(2014). Relations among socio-cognitive abilities and prosocial behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 591-603. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9726-1

45.

Yang

Xia

(2015). On the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis for ordered categorical data. Behavioral Research, 47, 756-772. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0499-2

46.

Ziv

(2007). Social information processing in preschool children: Preliminary evidence regarding a promising new measurement tool. In Zebrowski

J. A.

(Ed.), New research on social perception (pp. 47-74). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

47.

Ziv

Sorongon

(2011). Social information processing in preschool children: Relations to sociodemographic risk and problem behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 412-429. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.009

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

5.46 MB