The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire shortened form (ZKA-PQ/SF) in 18 cultures and 13 languages of different African, American, Asian, and European cultures and languages. The results showed that the five-factor structure with 20 facets replicated well across cultures with a total congruence coefficient of .97. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) resulted in adequate fit indices for the five factors based on the comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis index (TLI; >.90), and RMSEA (.031-.081). A series of CFA to assess measurement invariance across cultures resulted in adequate CFIs and TLIs for configural and metric invariance. However, factors did not show scalar invariance. Alpha internal consistencies of five factors ranged between .77 (Sensation Seeking) and .86 (Neuroticism). The average alpha of the 20 facets was .64 with a range from .43 (SS4) to .75 (AG1). Nevertheless, alpha reliabilities were lower in some facets and cultures, especially for Senegal and Togo. The average percentage of the variance explained based on the adjusted R2 was 2.9%, 1.7%, and 5.1% for age, sex, and, cultures, respectively. Finally, multidimensional scaling suggested that geographically or culturally close cultures share mean profile similarities.
AbadF. J.SorrelM. A.GarcíaL. F.AlujaA. (2016). Modeling general, specific, and method variance in personality measures: Results for ZKA-PQ and NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 25, 959-977. doi:10.1177/1073191116667547
2.
AllikJ.ChurchA. T.OrtizF. A.RossierJ.HřebíčkováM.de FruytF.. . . McCraeR. R. (2017). Mean profiles of the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 402-420. doi:10.1177/0022022117692100
3.
AllikJ.McCraeR. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 13-28. doi:10.1177/0022022103260382
4.
AlujaA.CuevasL.GarcíaL. F.GarcíaO. (2007). Zuckerman’s personality model predicts MCMI-III personality disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1311-1321. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.009
5.
AlujaA.EscorialS.GarcíaL. F.GarcíaÓ.BlanchA.ZuckermanM. (2013). Reanalysis of Eysenck’s, Gray’s, and Zuckerman’s structural trait models based on a new measure: The Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 192-196. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.030
6.
AlujaA.GarcíaO.GarcíaL. F. (2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman’s three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg’s 50-bipolar adjectives. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 713-725. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00186-6
7.
AlujaA.GarcíaO.GarcíaL. F. (2004). Replicability of the three, four and five Zuckerman’s personality super-factors: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the EPQ-RS, ZKPQ and NEO-PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1093-1108. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00203-4
8.
AlujaA.KuhlmanM.ZuckermanM. (2010). Development of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ): A factor/facet version of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 1-17. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.497406
9.
AlujaA.LucasI.BlanchA.GarcíaO.GarcíaL. F. (2018). The Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire shortened form (ZKA-PQ/SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 174-181. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.015
10.
AlujaA.RossierJ.GarcíaL. F.AngleitnerA.KuhlmanM.ZuckermanM. (2006). A cross-cultural shortened form of the ZKPQ (ZKPQ-50-CC) adapted to English, French, German, and Spanish languages. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 619-628. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.001
11.
ArthurW.Jr.DoverspikeD.MuñozG. J.TaylorJ. E.CarrA. E. (2014). The use of mobile devices in high-stakes remotely delivered assessments and testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 113-123. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12062
12.
BarrettP.EysenckS. (1984). The assessment of personality factors across 25 cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 615-632. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(84)90110-7
13.
BarrettP. T.PetridesK. V.EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J. (1998). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: An examination of factorial similarity of P, E, N, and L across 34 cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 805-819. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
14.
BlanchA.AlujaA. (2016). Text mining a self-report back-translation. Psychological Assessment, 28, 750-764. doi:10.1037/pas0000213
15.
BlanchA.AlujaA.GallartS. (2013). Personality assessment through Internet: Factor analyses by age groups of the ZKA Personality Questionnaire. Psychologica Belgica, 53, 101-119. doi:10.5334/pb-53-4-101
16.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
17.
BorgI.LingoesJ. C. (1987). Multidimensional similarity structure analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
18.
BowdenS. C.SaklofskeD. H.van de VijverF. J. R.SudarshanN. J.EysenckS. B. G. (2016). Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire across 33 cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 53-60. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.028
19.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230-258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
20.
BussA. H.PlominR. (1975). A temperament theory of personality development. New York, NY: Wiley.
21.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
ByrneB. M.van de VijverF. J. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107-132. doi:10.1080/15305051003637306
23.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
24.
CoffmanD. L.MacCallumR. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 235-259. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4
25.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
CostaP. T.Jr.TerraccianoA.McCraeR. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.322
27.
De PascalisV.RussoP. M. (2003). Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: Preliminary results of the Italian version. Psychological Reports, 92, 965-974. doi:10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.965
28.
GarcíaL. F.EscorialS.GarcíaO.BlanchA.AlujaA. (2012). Structural analysis of the facets and dimensions of the Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA–PQ) and the NEO PI–R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 156-163. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.645935
29.
GarcíaO.AlujaA.GarcíaL. F.EscorialS.BlanchA. (2012). Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ) and Cloninger’s Temperament and Character Inventory Revised (TCI-R): A comparative study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 247-257. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00943.x
30.
Gomà-i-FreixanetM.ValeroS.PuntíJ.ZuckermanM. (2004). Psychometric properties of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire in a Spanish Sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 134-146. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.20.2.134
31.
GoodmanJ. K.CryderC. E.CheemaA. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213-224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753
32.
HendriksA. A. J.PeruginiM.AngleitnerA.OstendorfF.JohnsonJ. A.De FruytF.. . . RuiselI. (2003). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory: Cross-cultural generalizability across 13 cultures. European Journal of Personality, 17, 347-373. doi:10.1002/per.491
33.
KajoniusP.Mac GiollaE. (2017). Personality traits across countries: Support for similarities rather than differences. PloS ONE, 12(6), e0179646. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179646
34.
KajoniusP. J. (2017). Cross-cultural personality differences between East Asia and Northern Europe in IPIP-NEO. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 3(1), 1-7. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13397
35.
KajoniusP. J.JohnsonJ. (2018). Sex differences in 30 facets of the five factor model of personality in the large public (N = 320,128). Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 126-130. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.026
36.
KruskalJ. B.WishM. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
KruyenP. M.EmonsW. H.SijtsmaK. (2013). On the shortcomings of shortened tests: A literature review. International Journal of Testing, 13, 223-248. doi:10.1080/15305058.2012.703734
38.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151-173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
39.
McCraeR. R.TerraccianoA. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547-561. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
40.
McCraeR. R.ZondermanA. B.CostaP. T.Jr.BondM. H.PaunonenS. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552-566. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552
41.
McCredieM. N.MoreyL. C. (2018). Who are the Turkers? A characterization of MTurk workers using the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1073191118760709
42.
MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
OstendorfF.AngleitnerA. (1994). A comparison of different instruments proposed to measure the Big Five. European Review of Applied Psychology, 44, 45-53.
44.
RossierJ.AlujaA.BlanchA.BarryO.HansenneM.CarvalhoA. F.. . . SuranyiZ. (2016). Cross-cultural generalizability of the alternative five-factor model using the Zuckerman–Kuhlman–Aluja Personality Questionnaire. European Journal of Personality, 30, 139-157. doi:10.1002/per.2045
45.
RossierJ.AlujaA.GarcíaL. F.AngleitnerA.De PascalisV.WangW.KuhlmanM.ZuckermanM. (2007). The cross-cultural generalizability of Zuckerman’s alternative five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 188-196. doi:10.1080/00223890701468618
46.
RossierJ.HansenneM.BaudinN.MorizotJ. (2012). Zuckerman’s revised alternative five-factor model: Validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire in four French-speaking cultures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 358-365. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.657024
47.
RossierJ.OuedraogoA.DahourouD. (2017). Personality structure and assessment in French-speaking African cultures. In ChurchA. T. (Eds.), The Praeger handbook of personality across cultures (Vol. 1, pp. 73-103), Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
48.
RossierJ.VerardiS.MassoudiK.AlujaA. (2008). Validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ) at the domain and facet level in a French-speaking sample. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 8, 203-217.
49.
SavickasM. L.PorfeliE. J. (2012). The Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 661-673. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011
50.
ShiomiK.KuhlmanD. M.ZuckermanM.JoreimanJ. A.SatoM.YataS. (1996). Examining the validity of a Japanese version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Hyago University of Teacher Education Journal, 2, 1-13.
51.
SurányiZ.AlujaA. (2014). Catalan and Hungarian validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ). Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, E24. doi:10.1017/sjp.2014.25
52.
ThomasA.ChessS. (1977). Temperament and development. New York, NY: Bruner/Mazel.
53.
van de VijverF. J. R.LeungK. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In MatsumotoD.van de VijverF. J. R. (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 17-45). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
54.
WuY.-X.WangW.DuW.-Y.LiJ.JiangX.-F.WangY.-H. (2000). Development of a Chinese version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: Reliabilities and gender/age effects. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 241-250. doi:10.2224/sbp.2000.28.3.241
55.
ZeccaG.VerardiS.AntoniettiJ.-P.DahourouD.AdjahouissoM.Ah-KionJ.. . . RossierJ. (2013). African cultures and the Five-Factor Model of personality: Evidence for a specific pan-African structure and profile?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 684-700. doi:10.1177/0022022112468943
56.
ZuckermanM. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57.
ZuckermanM. (2002). Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): An alternative five factorial model. In de RaadB.PeruginiM. (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 377-396). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
58.
ZuckermanM.AlujaA. (2015). Measures of sensation seeking. In BoyleG. J.SaklofskeD. H.MatthewsG. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 352-380). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
59.
ZuckermanM.EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J. (1978). Sensation Seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 139-149.
60.
ZuckermanM.KuhlmanD. M.CamacC. (1988). What lies beyond E and N? Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96-107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.96
61.
ZuckermanM.KuhlmanD. M.JoiremanJ.TetaP.KraftM. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.757
62.
ZuckermanM.KuhlmanD. M.ThornquistM.KiersH. (1991). Five (or three) Robust Questionnaire Scale factors of personality without culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 929-941. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90182-B
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
