The factorial invariance of the Asian American Family Conflicts Scale—Likelihood (FCS-L) was examined in a sample of 1,012 participants. Results support the use of the FCS-L in future research with diverse Asian subgroups. Limitations and future directions for research are discussed.
Ang, R.P., Lau, S., Tan, A., & Lim, K.M. ( 2007). Refining the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help scale: Factorial invariance across two Asian samples. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 40, 130-141.
2.
Bentler, P.M. ( 1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
Berkel, L.A., & Constantine, M.G. (2005). Relational variables and life satisfaction in African American and Asian American college women. Journal of College Counseling, 8, 5-13.
5.
Bontempo, D.E., & Hofer, S.M. ( 2007). Assessing factorial invariance in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 153-175). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Brislin, R. ( 1993). Understanding culture’s influence on behavior. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.
7.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. ( 1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258.
8.
Byrne, B.M. ( 1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Byrne, B.M., Shavelson, R.J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
10.
Cao, J., & Miller, M.J. ( 2008). Cultural factors impacting Chinese students’ career development and family relationship. Unpublished manuscript.
Chun, K.M., Morera, O.F., Andal, J.D., & Skewes, M.C. ( 2007). Conducting research with diverse Asian American groups . In F. T. L. Leong, A. Ebreo, L. Kinoshita , A. G. Inman, L. H. Yang, & M. Fu (Eds.), Handbook of Asian American psychology (2nd ed., pp. 47-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Constantine, M.G., & Flores, L.Y. ( 2006). Psychological distress, perceived family conflict, and career development issues in college students of color. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 354-369.
14.
Dimitrov, D.M. ( 2006). Comparing groups on latent variables: A structural equation modeling approach. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 26, 429-436.
15.
Fu, M. ( 2002). Acculturation, ethnic identity, and family conflict among first and second generation Chinese Americans. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, Los Angeles.
16.
Horn, J.L., & McArdle, J.J. ( 1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144.
17.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
18.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
19.
Huang, C.M.C. ( 2006). Acculturation, Asian cultural values, family conflict, and perceived stress in Chinese immigrant female college students in the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, Los Angeles.
20.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
21.
Kang, S.M. ( 2006). Measurement of acculturation, scale formats, and language competence: Their implications for adjustment. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 669-693.
22.
Lee, R.M., Choe, J., Kim, G., & Ngo, V. ( 2000). Construction of the Asian American Family Conflict Scale . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 211-222.
23.
Lee, R.M., Jung, K.R., Su, J.C., Tran, A.G.T.T., & Bahrassa, N. ( 2009). The family life and adjustment of Hmong American sons and daughters. Sex Roles, 60, 549-558.
24.
Lee, R.M., & Liu, H.-T.T. (2001). Coping with intergenerational family conflict: Comparison of Asian American, Hispanic, and European American college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 410-419.
25.
Lee, R.M., Su, J., & Yoshida, E. ( 2005). Coping with intergenerational family conflict among Asian American college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 52, 389-399.
26.
Leong, C.W. ( 2005). Asian American parent-teen conflicts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, St. John’s University, New York.
27.
Liang, C. ( 2005). The relationship of intergenerational family conflict, racism-related stress, and psychological well-being and the role of collective self-esteem among Asian American college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Maryland-College Park.
28.
Lin, L., Grome, R., & Miller, M.J. ( 2007, August). Acculturation, acculturative stress, and the likelihood of family conflict of Asian Americans. Poster presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association , San Francisco.
29.
Messick, S. ( 1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
30.
Min, P. G. (Ed.). (2006). Asian Americans: Contemporary trends and issues (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
31.
Nagayama Hall, G.C., & Barongan, C. ( 2002). Multicultural psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
Nagayama Hall, G. C., & Okazaki, S. (Eds.). (2002). Asian American psychology: The science of lives in context. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
Nguyen, G.H. ( 2003). The relationship between differential acculturation levels, family conflict, and self-esteem among Vietnamese Americans. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, Los Angeles.
34.
Okazaki, S. ( 2002). Beyond questionnaires: Conceptual and methodological innovations for Asian American psychology. In G. Nagayama Hall & S. Okazaki (Eds.), Asian American psychology: The science of lives in context (pp. 13-39). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
Reise, S.P., Widaman, K.F., & Pugh, R.H. ( 1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552-566.
36.
Sandhu, D.S. ( 1997). Psychocultural profiles of Asian and Pacific Islander Americans: Implications for counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 25, 7-22.
37.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors on covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. ( 2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis, Psychometrika, 66, 507-514.
39.
Steenkamp, J.E.M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research , 25, 78-90.
40.
Su, J., Lee, R.M., & Vang, S. ( 2005). Intergenerational family conflict and coping among Hmong American college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 52, 482-489.
41.
Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (Eds.). (2008). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
42.
Tatman, A.W. ( 2004). Hmong history, culture, and acculturation: Implications for counseling the Hmong. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 32, 222-233.
43.
Van de Vijver, E.J.R., & Leung, K. ( 1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. ( 2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
45.
Widaman, K.F., & Reise, S.P. ( 1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant & M. Windle (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281- 324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
