Despite widespread interest in variance in affect, basic questions remain pertaining to the relative proportions of between-person and within-person variance, the contribution of days and moments, and the reliability of these estimates. We addressed these questions by decomposing negative affect and positive affect variance across three levels (person, day, moment), and calculating reliability using a coordinated analysis of seven daily diary, ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and diary-EMA hybrid studies (across studies age = 18-84 years, total Npersons = 2,103, total Nobservations = 45,065). Across studies, within-person variance was sizeable (negative affect: 45% to 66%, positive affect: 25% to 74%); in EMA more within-person variance was attributable to momentary rather than daily level. Reliability was adequate to high at all levels of analysis (within-person: .73-.91; between-person: .96-1.00) despite different items and designs. We discuss the implications of these results for the design of future intensive studies of affect variance.
AlmeidaD. M.McGonagleK.KingH. (2009). Assessing daily stress processes in social surveys by combining stressor exposure and salivary cortisol. Biodemography and Social Biology, 55, 219-237. doi:10.1080/19485560903382338
2.
BiscontiT. L.BergemanC. S.BokerS. M. (2004). Emotional well-being in recently bereaved widows: A dynamical systems approach. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 59, P158-P167. doi:10.1093/geronb/59.4.P158
BroseA.ScheibeS.SchmiedekF. (2013). Life contexts make a difference: Emotional stability in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 28, 148-159. doi:10.1037/a0030047
5.
CarstensenL. L.TuranB.ScheibeS.RamN.Ersner-HershfieldH.Samanez-LarkinG. R.. . . NesselroadeJ. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26, 21-33. doi:10.1037/a0021285
6.
CharlesS. A.MogleJ.LegerK. A.AlmeidaD. M. (2017). Age and the factor structure of emotional experience in adulthood. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, gbx116, doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx116
7.
CranfordJ. A.ShroutP. E.IidaM.RafaeliE.YipT.BolgerN. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917-929. doi:10.1177/0146167206287721
8.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81-100.
9.
DamaskeS.SmythJ. M.ZawadzkiM. J. (2014). Has work replaced home as a haven? Re-examining Arlie Hochschild’s Time Bind proposition with objective stress data. Social Science & Medicine, 115, 130-138. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.047
10.
de Haan-RietdijkS.KuppensP.HamakerE. L. (2016). What’s in a day? A guide to decomposing the variance in intensive longitudinal data. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00891
11.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105-1117.
12.
Ebner-PriemerU. W.EidM.KleindienstN.StabenowS.TrullT. J. (2009). Analytic strategies for understanding affective (in)stability and other dynamic processes in psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 195-202. doi:10.1037/a0014868
13.
EidM.DienerE. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 662-676. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.662
14.
GorinA. A.StoneA. A. (2001). Recall biases and cognitive errors in retrospective self-reports: A call for momentary assessments. Handbook of Health Psychology, 23, 405-413.
15.
GrossJ. J.JazaieriH. (2014). Emotion, emotion regulation, and psychopathology: An affective science perspective. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 387-401. doi:10.1177/2167702614536164
16.
HoferS. M.PiccininA. M. (2009). Integrative analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 14, 150-164.
17.
JahngS.WoodP. K.TrullT. J. (2008). Analysis of affective instability in ecological momentary assessment: Indices using successive difference and group comparison via multilevel modeling. Psychological Methods, 13, 354-375. doi:10.1037/a0014173
18.
KuppensP.Van MechelenI.NezlekJ. B.DosscheD.TimmermansT. (2007). Individual differences in core affect variability and their relationship to personality and psychological adjustment. Emotion, 7, 262-274. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.262
19.
LarsenR. J. (1987). The stability of mood variability: A spectral analytic approach to daily mood assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1195-1204. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1195
20.
MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (2011). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
MogleJ.MuñozE.HillN. L.SmythJ. M.SliwinskiM. J. (2017). Daily memory lapses in adults: Characterization and influence on affect. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, gbx012. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx012
22.
MoskowitzD. S.ZuroffD. C. (2004). Flux, pulse, and spin: Dynamic Additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 880-893. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.880
23.
MroczekD. K.KolarzC. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333-1349.
24.
NezlekJ. B. (2016). A practical guide to understanding reliability in studies of within-person variability. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 149-155. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.020
RamN.ConroyD. E.PincusA. L.LorekA.RebarA.RocheM. J.. . . GerstorfD. (2014). Examining the interplay of processes across multiple time-scales: Illustration with the Intraindividual Study of Affect, Health, and Interpersonal Behavior (iSAHIB). Research in Human Development, 11, 142-160. doi:10.1080/15427609.2014.906739
27.
RamN.GerstorfD. (2009). Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778-791.
28.
RuizJ.TaylorD.UchinoB. N.SmithT.AllisonM.AhnC.. . . SmythJ. M. (2017). Evaluating the longitudinal risk of social vigilance on atherosclerosis: Study protocol for the North Texas Heart Study. BMJ Open, 7(8). Retrieved from https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/8/e017345
29.
RussellJ. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
30.
RussellJ. A.BarrettL. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805-819. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805
31.
RyanR. M.BernsteinJ. H.BrownK. W. (2010). Weekends, work, and well-being: Psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 95-122.
32.
ScottS. B.Graham-EngelandJ. E.EngelandC. G.SmythJ. M.AlmeidaD. M.KatzM. J.. . . SliwinskiM. J. (2015). The Effects of Stress on Cognitive Aging, Physiology and Emotion (ESCAPE) Project. BMC Psychiatry, 15, 146. doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0497-7
33.
SegerstromS. C.BoggeroI. A.SmithG. T.SephtonS. E. (2014). Variability and reliability of diurnal cortisol in younger and older adults: Implications for design decisions. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 49, 299-309. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.07.022
34.
SmythJ. M.SliwinskiM. J.ZawadzkiM. J.ScottS. B.ConroyD.LanzaS. T.. . . AlmeidaD. M. (2018). Everyday stress response targets in the science of behavior change. Behavior Research and Therapy, 101, 20-29. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.09.009
35.
SmythJ. M.ZawadzkiM. J.SantuzziA. M.FilipkowskiK. B. (2014). Examining the effects of perceived social support on momentary mood and symptom reports in asthma and arthritis patients. Psychology & Health, 29, 813-831. doi:10.1080/08870446.2014.889139
36.
StoneA. A.ShiffmanS.AtienzaA.NebelingL. (2007). The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
SulsJ.GreenP.HillisS. (1998). Emotional reactivity to everyday problems, affective inertia, and neuroticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 127-136. doi:10.1177/0146167298242002
38.
TrullT. J.SolhanM. B.TragesserS. L.JahngS.WoodP. K.PiaseckiT. M.WatsonD. (2008). Affective instability: Measuring a core feature of borderline personality disorder with ecological momentary assessment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 647-661. doi:10.1037/a0012532
39.
WatsonD. (1988). Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: Their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1020-1030. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1020
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
