We examined associations among cognitive processing measures that varied on a continuum from maximum to typical performance tasks in the context of an ego depletion study. Our intent was to replicate and extend the findings of Charek, Meyer, and Mihura, which showed that ego depletion had an expected effect on selected scores from the Rorschach inkblot task. We hypothesized that Rorschach variables indicative of cognitive sophistication would correlate with neuropsychological measures of cognitive ability and that Rorschach variables theoretically unassociated with cognitive processing would not correlate with those criterion measures. These hypotheses were supported, providing evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. We also hypothesized ego depletion effects on all measures; however, none were evident. Methodological considerations and implications of the findings are discussed.
AnnottiL. A.TeglasiH. (2017). Functioning in the real world: Using storytelling to improve validity in the assessment of executive functions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 254-264. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1205075
2.
BanduraA. (1954). The Rorschach white space response and perceptual reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 113-118. doi:10.1037/h0063608
3.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.MuravenM.TiceD. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252
4.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.TiceD. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351-355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
5.
BentonA. L.SivanA. B.HamsherK.VarneyN.SpreenO. (1994). Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: A clinical manual (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BeusJ. M.WhitmanD. S. (2012). The relationship between typical and maximum performance: A meta-analytical examination. Human Performance, 25, 355-376. doi:10.1080/08959285.2012.721831
7.
BornsteinR. F.BonnerS.KildowA. M.McCallC. A. (1997). Effects of individual versus group test administration on Rorschach Oral Dependency scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 2215-228. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6901_13
8.
CarterE. C.KoflerL. M.ForsterD. E.McCulloughM. E. (2015). A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 796-815. doi:10.1037/xge0000083
9.
CharekD. B. (2016). Differentiating maximal and typical performance measures: The impact of ego depletion on measures of maximal and typical cognition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.
10.
CharekD. B.MeyerG. J.MihuraJ. L. (2016). The impact of an ego depletion manipulation on performance-based and self-report assessment measures. Assessment, 23, 637-649. doi:10.1177/1073191115586580
11.
ChaytorN.Schmitter-EdgecombeM. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review, 13, 181-197. doi:10.1023/B:NERV.0000009483.91468.fb
12.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
13.
CronbachL. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
ExnerJ. E. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system, Vol. 1: Basic foundations (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
16.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN. D.AlbertsH.AnggonoC. O.BataillerC.BirtA.. . . ZwienenbergM. (2016). A multi-lab pre-registered replication of the ego depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 546-573. doi:10.1177/1745691616652873
17.
HaggerM. S.WoodC.StiffC.ChatzisarantisN. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495-525. doi:10.1037/a0019486
18.
Harrower-EricksonM. R.SteinerM. E. (1945). Large scale Rorschach techniques: A manual for the group Rorschach and multiple choice test. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
19.
HornS. L.MeyerG. J.MihuraJ. L. (2009). Impact of card rotation on the frequency of Rorschach reflection responses. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 346-356. doi:10.1080/00223890902936090
20.
HsiaoWMeyerG. J.MihuraJ. L.HornS. L. (2011, March). Corralling the Rorschach’s locus of effectiveness by using films. In BombelG. (Chair), Recent Rorschach research. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality Assessment, Boston, MA.
21.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
MihuraJ. L.DumitrascuN.RoyM.MeyerG. J. (2018). The centrality of the response process in construct validity: An illustration via the Rorschach Space response. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 233-249. doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1306781
26.
MihuraJ. L.MeyerG. J.DumitrascuN.BombelG. (2013). The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 548-605. doi:10.1037/a0029406
27.
MountD. L.HoggJ.JohnstoneB. (2002). Applicability of the 15-item versions of the Judgement of Line Orientation Test for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 16, 1051-1055. doi:10.1080/02699050210154259
28.
MuzioE. (2016). Inkblots and neurons: Correlating typical cognitive performance with brain structure and function. Rorschachiana, 37, 1-6. doi:10.1027/1192-5604/a000073
29.
PerryW.PotteratE. G. (1997). Beyond personality assessment: The use of the Rorschach as a neuropsychological instrument in patients with amnestic disorders. In MeloyJ.AcklinM. W.GaconoC. B.MurrayJ. F. (Eds.), Contemporary Rorschach interpretation (pp. 557-575). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
RitzlerB.NalesnikD. (1990). The effect of inquiry on the Exner Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 647-656. doi:10.1080/00223891.1990.9674099
31.
RorschachH. (1942). Psychodiagnostic: A diagnostic test based on perception (4th ed.). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
32.
SbordoneR. J. (2008). Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing: Critical issues. In HortonA. R.WeddingD. (Eds.), The neuropsychology handbook (3rd ed., pp. 367-394). New York, NY: Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
