This study aimed to validate a parent-report measure of child adjustment and parenting efficacy (Child Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale [CAPES]) in a Chinese cultural context. Six hundred and fifty Chinese parents in China participated in the study and completed a set of questionnaires including the CAPES, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC), and the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS). The factorial, convergent, and concurrent validity as well as internal consistency were evaluated. The results provided support for a new 2-factor structure of child behavioral and emotional adjustment. The 1-factor structure of parenting efficacy was confirmed. The three constructs obtained satisfactory internal consistency. Moreover, the CAPES scores correlated significantly with the SDQ, PSOC, and PAFAS in the expected pattern, which indicated its excellent convergent and concurrent validity. Therefore, it is a promising measure, due to its brevity and comprehensiveness, with the first indications of satisfactory internal consistency and validity among Chinese parents. However, a revision of the instrument is needed to avoid the ordering effects of positive and negative items, and further hypothesis-driven research is also needed to validate the (revised) instrument in different Chinese samples.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
2.
AnselmiL.BarrosF. C.TeodoroM. L. M.PiccininiC. A.MenezesA. M. B.AraujoC. L.RohdeL. A. (2008). Continuity of behavioral and emotional problems from pre-school years to pre-adolescence in a developing country. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 499-507. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01865.x
AsparouhovT.MuthenB. O. (2010). Multiple imputation with Mplus. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
5.
BandalosD. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0901_5
6.
BeauducelA.HerzbergP. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186-203. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
7.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445-455.
9.
CheungF. M.HoR. M. (1997). Standardization of the Chinese MMPI-A in Hong Kong: A preliminary study. Psychological Assessment, 9, 499-502. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.9.4.499
DolanC. V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5 and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 309-326.
12.
EybergS. M.PincusD. (1999). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory and Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory–Revised: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13.
FanJ.DuY. S.WangL. (2005). Conners fu mu zheng zhuang wen juan de zhong guo cheng shi chang mo he xin du yan jiu [The norm and reliability of the Conners Parent Symptom Questionnaire in Chinese urban children]. Shanghai Jing Shen Yi Xue, 17, 321-323.
14.
FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J.RidderE. M. (2005). Show me the child at seven: The consequences of conduct problems in childhood for psychosocial functioning in adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 46, 837-849. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00387.x
15.
FloydF. J.WidamanK. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
16.
GoodmanR. (1999). The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 791-799. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00494
17.
GoodmanR. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345.
18.
GrahamJ. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
19.
GuoM.MorawskaA.FilusA. (2016). Validation of the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) to measure parenting skills and family adjustment in Chinese parents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0748175615625754
20.
HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In CudeckR.JöreskogK. G.SörbomD.Du ToitS. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 195-216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
21.
Hangzhou Statistics Bureau (2015). 2014 nian hang zhou shi guo min jing ji he she hui fa zhan tong ji gong bao [A public statistic report on the national economy and societal development of Hangzhou in 2014]. Retrieved from http://hzdaily.hangzhou.com.cn/hzrb/html/2015-03/03/content_1907341.htm
22.
HuL.-T.BentlerP. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
23.
JohnstonC.MashE. J. (1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18, 167-175.
24.
JonesT. L.PrinzR. J. (2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 341-363.
25.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
KouJ.DuY.XiaL. (2005). Er tong Chang Chu he kun nan wen Juan (Fu mu ban) Shang Hai Chang mu de Xin du he Xiao du [Evaluation of the reliability and validity of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Parent version) in Shanghai]. Shanghai Jing Shen Yi Xue, 17(1), 25-28.
27.
LeungP. W. L.WongM. M. T. (2003). Measures of child and adolescent psychopathology in Asia. Psychological Assessment, 15, 268-279. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.3.268
28.
LiK. H.MengX. L.RaghunathanT. E.RubinD. B. (1991). Significance levels from p values and multiply imputed data. Statistica Sinica, 1, 65-92.
29.
LiH. T.YeR. W.RenA. G.GaoJ. J.ZhangT.LiuJ. M. (2009). Behavioral problems of children aged 4-6 years in 26 cities and counties in China. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 23, 415-420.
30.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1
31.
LiuJ. H.ChengH.LeungP. W. L. (2011). The application of the Preschool Child Behavior Checklist and the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form to Mainland Chinese children: Syndrome structure, gender differences, country effects, and inter-informant agreement. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 251-264. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9452-8
32.
LiuS. J. (2006). SDQ zhong wen ban de xin xiao du yan jiu [Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the SDQ] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
33.
MarshH. W.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.LüdtkeO.RobitzschA.MorinA. J.TrautweinU. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439-476.
34.
MatsunagaM. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97-110.
35.
MejiaA.CalamR.SandersM. R. (2012). A review of parenting programs in developing countries: Opportunities and challenges for preventing emotional and behavioral difficulties in children. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15, 163-175. doi:10.1007/s10567-012-0116-9
36.
MejiaA.FilusA.CalamR.MorawskaA.SandersM. R. (2015). Validation of the Spanish version of the CAPES: A brief instrument for assessing child psychological difficulties and parental self-efficacy. Advance online publication. International Journal of Behavioral Development. doi:10.1177/0165025415591229
37.
MorawskaA.SandersM. R. (2007). Concurrent predictors of dysfunctional parenting and maternal confidence: Implications for parenting interventions. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33, 757-767. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00758.x
38.
MorawskaA.SandersM. R.HaslamD. M.FilusA.FletcherR. (2014). Child Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale (CAPES): Development and initial validation of a parent report measure. Australian Psychologist, 49, 241-252.
39.
MuthenB.KaplanD. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45(1), 19-30. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1992.tb00975.x
40.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
41.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2013). Quan ti ji cheng xiang ju min shou zhi ji ben qing kuang [The income and expediture of residents in China]. Retrieved from http://data.stats.gov.cn/workspace/index?m=hgnd
42.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
43.
NgaiF. W.ChanS. W. C.HolroydE. (2007). Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the parenting sense of competence scale in Chinese mothers. Nursing Research, 56, 348-354. doi:10.1097/01.nnr.0000289499.99542.94
44.
RaubenheimerJ. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximize scale reliability and validity. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59-64.
45.
RhemtullaM.Brosseau-LiardP. E.SavaleiV. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354-373.
46.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation from nonresponse survey. New York, NY: Wiley.
47.
SandersM. R. (2008). Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 506-517. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.506
48.
SandersM. R.MorawskaA. (2010). Family Background Questionnaire. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: Parenting and Family Support Centre, University of Queensland.
49.
SandersM. R.MorawskaA.HaslamD.FilusA.FletcherR. (2014). Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS): Validation of a brief parent-report measure for use in assessment of parenting skills and family relationships. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 45, 255-272. doi:10.1007/s10578-013-0397-3
50.
SatorraA. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In HeijmansR. D. H.PollockD. S. G.SatorraA. (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis. A Festschrift for Heinz Neudecker (pp. 233-247). London, England: Kluwer Academic.
51.
SchumanH.PresserS. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
52.
StevensJ. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
SuL.LiX.LuoX.WanG.YangZ. (1998). Achenbach er tong xing wei liang biao de zai biao zhun hua ji xiao du jian yan [Revalidation and standardization of Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist] Zhong Guo Xin Li wei Sheng Za Zhi, 12(2), 67-70.
54.
SuL.LiX.WanG.YangZ.LuoX. (1996). Achenbach er tong xing wei liang biao de hu nan chang mo [The norms of Achenbach Behavior Checklist in Hunan Province]. Zhong Guo Lin Chuang Xin Li Xue Za Zhi, 4(1), 24-29.
55.
WangS. (2015). Zhong guo gao deng jiao yu mao ru xue lv da 37.5%, yin shi ling ren kou liang jian shao [Chinese enrolment rate of higher education goes up to 37.5%, caused by the decreased population of college age]. Retrieved from http://www.qianzhan.com/analyst/detail/220/150817-e8129fab.html
56.
WeinbergerA. H.DarkesJ.Del BocaF. K.GreenbaumP. E.GoldmanM. S. (2006). Items as context: Effects of item order and ambiguity on factor structure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 17-26. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2801_2
57.
YaoS.GongY. (1993a). Er tong shi ying xing wei ping ding liang biao de bian zhi ji cheng xiang qu yu xing chang mo de bian zhi [Constructing the Chinese adaptive behavior rating scale for 3-12 year-old children]. Xin Li Ke Xue, 16(1), 38-43.
58.
YaoS.GongY. (1993b). Er tong shi ying xing wei ping ding liang biao quan guo chang mo de zhi ding [Development of national norms of Chinese Child Adaptive Behavior Scale]. Zhong Guo Lin Chuang Xin Li Xue Za Zhi, 1(2), 76-80.
59.
ZhangX. H.WuY. Q.LuW. (2006). Prevalence of behavior problem of school-aged children. Modern Preventive Medicine, 33, 2375-2376.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
