Multiple studies have shown that performance on behavioral decision-making tasks, such as the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), is influenced by external factors, such as mood. However, the research regarding the influence of worry is mixed, and no research has examined the effect of math or test anxiety on these tasks. The present study investigated the effects of anxiety (including math anxiety) and math performance on the IGT and BART in a sample of 137 undergraduate students. Math performance and worry were not correlated with performance on the IGT, and no variables were correlated with BART performance. Linear regressions indicated math anxiety, physiological anxiety, social concerns/stress, and test anxiety significantly predicted disadvantageous selections on the IGT during the transition from decision making under ambiguity to decision making under risk. Implications for clinical evaluation of decision making are discussed.
AkanbiS. T. (2013). Comparisons of test anxiety level of senior secondary school students across gender, year of study, school type and parental educational background. IFE Psychologia, 21, 40-54.
2.
AklinW. M.LejuezC. W.ZvolenskyM. J.KahlerC. W.GwadzM. (2005). Evaluation of behavioral measures of risk taking propensity with inner city adolescents. Behavior Research and Therapy, 43, 215-228. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.12.007
3.
AshcraftM. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 181-185. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00196
4.
AshcraftM. H.FaustM. W. (1994). Mathematics anxiety and mental arithmetic performance: An exploratory investigation. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 97-125. doi:10.1080/02699939408408931
5.
AshcraftM. H.KirkE. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 224-237. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.224
BecharaA.DamasioA. R.DamasioH.AndersonS. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3
8.
BetzN. E. (1978). Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 441-448. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.25.5.441
9.
BishopS. J.DuncanJ.BrettM.LawrenceA. (2004). Prefrontal cortical function and anxiety: Controlling attention to threat-related stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 184-188. doi:10.1038/nn1173
10.
BorkovecT. D.RoemerL. (1995). Perceived functions of worry among generalized anxiety disorder subjects: Distraction from more emotionally distressing topics. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 25-30. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(94)00064-S
11.
BrandM.FujiwaraE.BorsutzkyS.KalbeE.KesslerJ.MarkowitschH. J. (2005). Decision-making deficits of Korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: Associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology, 19, 267-277. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.267
12.
BrandM.RecknorE. C.GrabenhorstF.BecharaA. (2007). Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 86-99. doi:10.1080/13803390500507196
13.
BrandM.SchiebenerJ.PertlM-T.DelazerM. (2014). Know the risk, take the win: How executive functions and probability processing influence advantageous decision making under risk conditions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 36, 914-929. doi:10.1080/13803395.2014.955783
14.
BuelowM. T.BlaineA. L. (2015). The assessment of risky decision making: A factor analysis of performance on the Iowa Gambling Task, Balloon Analogue Risk Task, and Columbia Card Task. Psychological Assessment, 27, 777-785. doi:10.1037/a0038622
15.
BuelowM. T.FrakeyL. L. (2013). Math anxiety differentially affects WAIS-IV arithmetic performance in undergraduates. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28, 356-362. doi:10.1093/arclin/act006
16.
BuelowM. T.SuhrJ. A. (2009). Construct validity of the Iowa Gambling Task. Neuropsychology Review, 19, 102-114. doi:10.1007/s11065-009-9083-4
17.
CassadayJ. C.JohnsonR. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270-295. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
18.
Castro e CoutoT.NevesF. S.MachadoM. C. L.VasconcelosA. G.CorreaH.Malloy-DinizL. F. (2012). Assessment of impulsivity in bipolar disorder (BD) in comorbidity with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): Revisiting the hypothesis of protective effect. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 9, 102-106.
19.
ChapellM. S.BlandingZ. B.SilversteinM. E.TakahashiM.NewmanB.McCannN. (2005). Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 268-274. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.268
20.
de VisserL.van der KnaapL. J.van de LooA. J. A. E.van der WeerdC. M. M.OhlF.van den BosR. (2010). Trait anxiety affects decision-making differently in healthy men and women: Towards gender-specific endophenotypes of anxiety. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1598-1606. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.027
21.
DevineA.FawcettK.SzucsD.DowkerA. (2012). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8, 33. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-8-33
22.
DewK. H.GalassiJ. P. (1983). Mathematics anxiety: Some basic issues. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 443-446. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.30.3.443
23.
DrostJ.SpinhovenP.KruijtA. W.van der DoesW. (2014). The influence of worry and avoidance on the Iowa Gambling Task. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45, 74-80. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.08.001
24.
DunnB. D.DalgleishT.LawrenceA. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 239-271. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001
25.
EysenckM. W.CalvoM. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 409-434. doi:10.1080/02699939208409696
26.
EysenckM. W.DerakshanN.SantosR.CalvoM. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336-353. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
27.
FignerB.MackinlayR. J.WilkeningF.WeberE. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 709-730. doi:10.1037/a0014983
28.
FignerB.VoelkiN. (2004). Risky decision making in a computer card game: An information integration experiment. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 135-139.
29.
GigerenzerG.GaissmaierW.Kurz-MilckeE.SchwartzL. M.WoloshinS. (2008). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 53-96. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x
30.
GuillaumeS.JollantF.JaussentI.LawrenceN.MalafosseA.CourtetP. (2009). Somatic markers and explicit knowledge are both involved in decision-making. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2120-2124. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.003
31.
HartleyC. A.PhelpsE. A. (2012). Anxiety and decision-making. Biological Psychiatry, 72, 113-118.
32.
HembreeR. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47-77. doi:10.3102/00346543058001047
33.
HembreeR. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33-46. doi:10.2307/749455
34.
HopkoD. R.CrittendonJ. A.GrantE.WilsonS. A. (2005). The impact of anxiety on performance IQ. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 18, 17-35. doi:10.1080/10615800412336436
35.
HopkoD. R.McNeilD. W.LejuezC. W.AshcraftM. H.EifertG. H.RielJ. (2003). The effects of anxious responding on mental arithmetic and lexical decision task performance. Anxiety Disorders, 17, 647-665. doi:10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00240-2
36.
HopkoD. R.MahadevanR.BareR. L.HuntM. K. (2003). The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10, 178-182. doi:10.1177/1073191103010002008
37.
HopkoD. R.McNeilD. W.ZvolenskyM. J.EifertG. H. (2001). The relation between anxiety and skill in performance-based anxiety disorders: A behavioral formulation of social phobia. Behavior Therapy, 32, 185-207. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(01)80052-6
38.
IkedaM.IwanagaM.SeiwaH. (1996). Test anxiety and working memory system. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 82, 1223-1231. doi:10.2466/pms.1996.82.3c.1223
39.
JonesW. J.ChildersT. L.JiangY. (2012). The shopping brain: Math anxiety modulates brain responses to buying decisions. Biological Psychology, 89, 201-213. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.011
40.
KirschM.WindmannS. (2009). The role of anxiety in decision-making. Review of Psychology, 16, 19-28.
41.
KoC. H.HsiaoS.LiuG. C.YenJ. Y.YangM. J.YenC. F. (2010). The characteristics of decision making, potential to take risks, and personality of college students with Internet addiction. Psychiatry Research, 175, 121-125. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.10.004
42.
LejuezC. W.AklinW. M.BornovalovaM. A.MoolchanE. T. (2005). Differences in risk-taking propensity across inner-city adolescent ever- and never-smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 7, 71-79. doi:10.1080/14622200412331328484
43.
LejuezC. W.AklinW. M.JonesH. A.RichardsJ. B.StrongD. R.ReadJ. P. (2003). The balloon analogue risk task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 26-33. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26
44.
LejuezC. W.ReadJ. P.KahlerC. W.RichardsJ. B.RamseyS. E.BrownR. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75
45.
LevineG. (1995). Closing the gender gap: Focus on mathematics anxiety. Contemporary Education, 67, 42-45.
46.
LiewJ.LenchH. C.KaoG.YehY.KwokO. (2014). Avoidance temperament and social-evaluative threat in college students’ math performance: A mediation model of math and test anxiety. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 27, 650-661. doi:10.1080/10615806.2014.910303
47.
LoweP. A.PeytonV.ReynoldsC. R. (2007). Test score stability and the relationship of adult manifest anxiety scale-college version scores to external variables among graduate students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 69-81. doi:10.1177/0734282906293698
48.
MaX. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal of Research in Math Education, 30, 520-540. doi: 10.2307/749772
49.
MaX.XuJ. (2004). Determining the causal ordering between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. American Journal of Education, 110, 256-281.
50.
MaiaT. V.McClellandJ. L. (2004). A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa Gambling Task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 16075-16080. doi:10.1073/pnas.0406666101
51.
ManerJ. K.RicheyA.CromerK.MallottM.LejuezC. W.SchmidtN. B. (2007). Dispositional anxiety and risk-avoidant decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 665-675. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.016
52.
MarkhamR.DarkeS. (1991). The effects of anxiety on verbal and spatial task performance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 107-111. doi:10.1080/00049539108259108
53.
MathewsA.MacLeodC. (1986). Discrimination of threat cues without awareness in anxiety states. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 131-138. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.95.2.131
54.
MillerH.BichselJ. (2004). Anxiety, working memory, gender, and math performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 591-606. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.029
55.
MiuA. C.HeilmanR. M.HouserD. (2008). Anxiety impairs decision-making: Psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biological Psychology, 77, 353-358. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.010
56.
MorsanyiK.BusdraghiC.PrimiC. (2014). Mathematical anxiety is linked to reduced cognitive reflection: A potential road from discomfort in the mathematics classroom to susceptibility biases. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 10, 31-43. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-10-31
57.
MuellerE. M.NguyenJ.RayW. J.BorkovecT. D. (2010). Future-oriented decision-making in generalized anxiety disorder is evident across different versions of the Iowa Gambling Task. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 165-171. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.12.002
58.
MuschJ.BroderA. (1999). Test anxiety versus academic skills: A comparison of two alternative models for predicting performance in a statistics exam. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 105-116. doi:10.1348/000709999157608
59.
NgE.LeeK. (2015). Effects of trait anxiety and state anxiety on children’s working memory task performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 141-148. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.007
60.
Nichols-HoppeK. T.BeachL. R. (1990). The effects of test anxiety and task variables on predecisional information search. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 163-172. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(90)90014-W
61.
NoelX.BecharaA.DanB.HanakC.VerbanckP. (2007). Response inhibition deficit is involved in poor decision making under risk in nonamnesic individuals with alcoholism. Neuropsychology, 21, 778-786. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.21.6.778
62.
PajkossyP.DezsoL.PaprikaZ. Z. (2009). The opposite effect of trait and state anxiety on Iowa Gambling Task. Learning & Perception, 1, 279-295. doi:10.1556/LP.1.2009.2.110
63.
PaulusM. P.RogalskyC.SimmonsA.FeinsteinJ. S.SteinM. B. (2003). Increased activation in the right insula during risk-taking decision making is related to harm avoidance and neuroticism. NeuroImage, 19, 1439-1448. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00251-9
64.
PlakeB. S.ParkerC. S. (1982). The development and validation of a revised version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 551-557. doi:10.1177/001316448204200218
65.
PutwainD.DalyA. L. (2014). Test anxiety prevalence and gender differences in a sample of English secondary school students. Educational Studies, 40, 554-570. doi:10.1080/03055698.2014.953914
66.
ReynaV. F.NelsonW.HanP.DieckmannN. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943-973. doi:10.1037/a0017327
67.
ReynoldsC. R.RichmondB. O.LoweP. A. (2003). The Adult Manifest Anxiety Scale: Professional manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
68.
RichardsonF. C.SuinnR. M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551-554. doi:10.1037/h0033456
69.
RydellR. J.Van LooK. J.BoucherK. L. (2014). Stereotype threat and executive functions: Which functions mediate different threat-related outcomes?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 377-390. doi:10.1177/0146167213513475
70.
SarasonI. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929-938. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.929
71.
ScafidiT.BuiK. (2010). Gender similarities in math performance from middle school through high school. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37, 252-255.
72.
SchiebenerJ.ZamarianL.DelazerM.BrandM. (2011). Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: What does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions?Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 1025-1039. doi:10.1080/13803395.2011.595702
73.
SeippB. (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings. Anxiety Research, 4, 27-41. doi:10.1080/08917779108248762
74.
SkeelR. L.NeudeckerJ.PilarskiC.PytlakK. (2007). The utility of personality variables and behaviorally-based measures in the prediction of risk-taking behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 203-214. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.025
75.
TapiaM. (2004). The relationship of math anxiety and gender. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8, 130-134.
76.
ThamesA. D.PanosS. E.ArentoftA.ByrdD. A.HinkinC. H.ArbidN. (2015). Mild test anxiety influences neurocognitive performance among African Americans and European Americans: Identifying interfering and facilitating sources. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21, 105-113. doi:10.1037/a0037530
77.
ToplakM. E.SorgeG. B.BenoitA.WestR. F.StanovichK. E. (2010). Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 562-581. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.002
78.
van den BosR.HombergJ.de VisserL. (2013). A critical review of sex differences in decision-making tasks: Focus on the Iowa Gambling Task. Behavioural Brain Research, 238, 95-108. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.002
79.
WernerN. S.DuschekS.SchandryR. (2009). Relationships between affective states and decision-making. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74, 259-265. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.010
80.
WilkinsonG. S.RobertsonG. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test-4: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: PAR.
81.
WittchenH. U.CarterR. M.PfisterH.MontgomeryS. A.KesslerR. C. (2000). Disabilities and quality of life in pure and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in a national survey. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15, 319-328.
82.
WorthyD. A.ByrneK. A.FieldsS. (2014). Effects of emotion on prospection during decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 591. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00591
