Psychometric Properties,Factor Structure,and Gender and Educational Level Invariance of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) in Spanish Children and Adolescents

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the factor structure and degree of measurement invariance of a Spanish adaptation of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) in primary and secondary school students (N = 1,504 students, 46.08% males, 7-19 years of age). The results of confirmatory factor analysis corroborated the original two-factor structure, although a modified two-factor model with one item loading simultaneously on both factors was better supported. Full measurement invariance was observed across gender, and partial measurement invariance was achieved across educational levels (primary and secondary education). The AMAS showed reasonable internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and convergent validity. These results highlight the utility of the AMAS as a measure of math anxiety in primary and secondary school students whose scores can be compared by gender and educational level.

Keywords

math anxiety factor structure measurement invariance psychometrics properties children adolescents Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashcraft

M. H.

(2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196

Ashcraft

M. H.

Ridley

K. S.

(2005). Math anxiety and its cognitive consequences: A tutorial review. In Campbell

J. I. D.

(Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 315-327). Psychology Press.

Beauducel

Herzberg

P. Y.

(2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(2), 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2

Brown

J. L.

Sifuentes

L. M.

(2016). Validation study of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale: Spanish adaptation. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 5(2), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v5n2p76

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Carey

Hill

Devine

Szűcs

. (2017). The modified Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale: A valid and reliable instrument for use with children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00011

Caviola

Primi

Chiesi

Mammarella

I.C.

(2017). Psychometric properties of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) in Italian primary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 55(April), 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.006

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

10.

Cipora

Szczygieł

Willmes

Nuerk

H. C.

(2015). Math anxiety assessment with the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale: Applicability and usefulness: Insights from the polish adaptation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01833

11.

Cipora

Willmes

Szwarc

Nuerk

H. C.

(2018). Norms and validation of the online and paper-and-pencil versions of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) for Polish adolescents and adults. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(3), 667-693. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i3.121

12.

Diedenhofen

Musch

(2015). cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945

13.

Dimitrov

D. M.

(2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459

14.

Dowker

Bennett

Smith

(2012). Attitudes to mathematics in primary school children. Child Development Research, 2012, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/124939

15.

Dowker

Sarkar

Looi

C. Y

. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508

16.

Dunn

T. J.

Baguley

Brunsden

(2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046

17.

Evans

Borriello

G. A.

Field

A. P.

(2018). A review of the academic and psychological impact of the transition to secondary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01482

18.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

19.

Flora

D. B.

Curran

P. J.

(2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466

20.

Foley

A. E.

Herts

J. B.

Borgonovi

Guerriero

Levine

S. C.

Beilock

S. L.

(2017). The math anxiety-performance link: A global phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416672463

21.

Ganley

C. M.

McGraw

A. L.

(2016). The development and validation of a revised version of the Math Anxiety Scale for young children. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01181

22.

Gierl

M. J.

Bisanz

(1995). Anxieties and attitudes related to mathematics in Grades 3 and 6. Journal of Experimental Education, 63(2), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1995.9943818

23.

Han

Colarelli

S. M.

Weed

N. C.

(2019). Methodological and statistical advances in the consideration of cultural diversity in assessment: A critical review of group classification and measurement invariance testing. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1481-1496. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000731

24.

Harari

R. R.

Vukovic

R. K.

Bailey

S. P.

(2013). Mathematics anxiety in young children: An exploratory study. Journal of Experimental Education, 81(4), 538-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.727888

25.

Hembree

(1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/749455

26.

Henseler

Ringle

C. M.

Sarstedt

(2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

27.

Hill

Mammarella

I. C.

Devine

Caviola

Passolunghi

M. C.

Szűcs

(2016). Maths anxiety in primary and secondary school students: Gender differences, developmental changes and anxiety specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 48(May), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.006

28.

Hopko

D. R.

Mahadevan

Bare

R. L.

Hunt

M. K.

(2003). The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10(2), 178-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103010002008

29.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

30.

Jorgensen

T. D.

Pornprasertmanit

Schoemann

A. M.

Rosseel

(2020). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R package version 0.5-3) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools

31.

Koziol

N. A.

Bovaird

J. A.

(2018). The impact of model parameterization and estimation methods on tests of measurement invariance with ordered polytomous data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(2), 272-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416683754

32.

Liu

Millsap

R. E.

West

S. G.

Tein

J.-Y.

Tanaka

Grimm

K. J.

(2017). Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 486-506. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000075

33.

Maloney

E. A.

Ansari

Fugelsang

J. A.

(2011). Rapid communication: The effect of mathematics anxiety on the processing of numerical magnitude. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F17470218.2010.533278

34.

Milovanović

Branovački

(2020). Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of Modified Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale for children in Serbia. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10066-w

35.

Moran

T. P.

(2016). Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 831-864. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000051

36.

Namkung

J. M.

Peng

Lin

(2019). The relation between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance among school-aged students: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 459-496. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319843494

37.

Passolunghi

M. C.

Ferreira

T. I. R.

Tomasetto

(2014). Math–gender stereotypes and math-related beliefs in childhood and early adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 34(August), 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.005

38.

Plake

Parker

(1982). The development and validation of a revised version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42(2), 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448204200218

39.

Primi

Busdraghi

Tomasetto

Morsanyi

Chiesi

(2014). Measuring math anxiety in Italian college and high school students: Validity, reliability and gender invariance of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS). Learning and Individual Differences, 34(August), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.012

40.

Primi

Donati

M. A.

Izzo

V. A.

Guardabassi

O’Connor

P. A.

Tomasetto

Morsanyi

(2020). The early elementary school Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (the EES-AMAS): A new adapted version of the AMAS to measure math anxiety in young children. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01014

41.

Putnick

D. L.

Bornstein

M. H.

(2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41(September), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

42.

R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

43.

Ramirez

Shaw

S. T.

Maloney

E. A.

(2018). Math anxiety: Past research, promising interventions, and a new interpretation framework. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1447384

44.

Richardson

F. C.

Suinn

R. M.

(1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551-554. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033456

45.

Rosseel

(2012). lavaan: An R Package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

46.

Sadiković

Milovanović

Oljača

(2018). Another psychometric proof of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale usefulness: IRT analysis. Primenjena Psihologija, 11(3), 301-323. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2018.3.301-323

47.

Sass

D. A.

Schmitt

T. A.

Marsh

H. W.

(2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658

48.

Satorra

Bentler

P. M.

(2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192

49.

Schillinger

F. L.

Vogel

S. E.

Diedrich

Grabner

R. H.

(2018). Math anxiety, intelligence, and performance in mathematics: Insights from the German adaptation of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS-G). Learning and Individual Differences, 61(January), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.014

50.

Sorvo

Koponen

Viholainen

Aro

Räikkönen

Peura

Tolvanen

Aro

(2019). Development of math anxiety and its longitudinal relationships with arithmetic achievement among primary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 69(January), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.12.005

51.

Spielberger

C. D.

Edwards

C. D.

Lushene

R. E.

Montuori

Platzek

(1973). STAIC preliminary manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.

52.

Steenkamp

J. B. E. M.

Baumgartner

(1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528

53.

Stoet

Bailey

D. H.

Moore

A. M.

Geary

D. C.

(2016). Countries with higher levels of gender equality show larger national sex differences in mathematics anxiety and relatively lower parental mathematics valuation for girls. PLOS ONE, 11(4), Article e0153857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153857

54.

Szczygieł

(2019). How to measure math anxiety in young children? Psychometric properties of the modified Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale for elementary children (mAMAS-E). Polish Psychological Bulletin, 50(4), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.24425/ppb.2019.131003

55.

Vahedi

Farrokhi

(2011). A confirmatory factor analysis of the structure of Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 6(2), 47-53.

56.

Vandenberg

R. J.

Lance

C. E.

(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002

57.

Estabrook

(2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014-1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0

58.

Young

C. B.

S. S.

Menon

(2012). The neurodevelopmental basis of math anxiety. Psychological Science, 23(5), 492-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429134

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.11 MB