Augmenting the Core Battery With Supplementary Subtests: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—IV Measurement Invariance Across the United States and Canada
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2011
Augmenting the Core Battery With Supplementary Subtests: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—IV Measurement Invariance Across the United States and Canada
Examination of measurement invariance provides a powerful method to evaluate the hypothesis that the same set of psychological constructs underlies a set of test scores in different populations. If measurement invariance is observed, then the same psychological meaning can be ascribed to scores in both populations. In this study, the measurement model including core and supplementary subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth edition (WAIS-IV) were compared across the U.S. and Canadian standardization samples. Populations were compared on the 15 subtest version of the test in people aged 70 and younger and on the 12 subtest version in people aged 70 or older. Results indicated that a slightly modified version of the four-factor model reported in the WAIS-IV technical manual provided the best fit in both populations and in both age groups. The null hypothesis of measurement invariance across populations was not rejected, and the results provide direct evidence for the generalizability of convergent and discriminant validity studies with the WAIS-IV across populations. Small to medium differences in latent means favoring Canadians highlight the value of local norms.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. ( 1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Benson, N., Hulac, D.M., & Kranzler, J.H. (2009). Independent examination of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV): What does the WAIS-IV measure?Psychological Assessment, 22, 121-130.
3.
Bontempo, D.E., & Hofer, S.M. ( 2007). Assessing factorial invariance in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. In A. D. Ong & M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 153-175). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4.
Bowden, S.C., Cook, M.J., Bardenhagen, F.J., Shores, E.A., & Carstairs, J.R. (2004). Measurement invariance of core cognitive abilities in heterogeneous neurological and community samples . Intelligence, 33, 363-389.
5.
Bowden, S.C., Weiss, L.G., Holdnack, J.A., & Lloyd, D. ( 2006). Age-related invariance of abilities measured with the Wechsler Adults Intelligence Scale-III. Psychological Assessment , 18, 334-339.
6.
Bowden, S.C., Gregg, N., Bandalos, D., Davis, M., Coleman, C., Holdnack, J.A., & Weiss, L.G. ( 2008). Latent mean and covariance differences with measurement equivalence in college students with developmental difficulties versus the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III/Wechsler Memory Scale-III normative sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 621-642.
7.
Bowden, S.C., Lange, R.T., Weiss, L.G., & Saklofske, D.H. (2008). Invariance of the measurement model underlying the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III in the United States and Canada. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 1024-1040.
8.
Bowden, S.C., Saklofske, D.H., & Weiss, L.G. ( 2010). Invariance of the measurement model underlying the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV in the United States and Canada. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9.
Brown, T.A. ( 2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
Byrne, B.M. ( 1998). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Byrne, B.M., Shavelson, R.J., & Muthen, B. ( 1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
12.
Carroll, J.B. ( 1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge , England: Cambridge University Press.
Daniel, M.H. ( 2010). The influence of subtest and index-score variability on the validity of WAIS-IV composite scores. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15.
Dawes, R.M. ( 1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571-582.
16.
Dudgeon, P.L. ( 2004). A note on extending Steiger’s (1998) multiple sample RMSEA adjustment to other noncentrality parameter-based statistics. Structural Equation Modelling, 11, 305-319.
17.
Fitzgerald, S., Gray, N.S., & Snowden, R.J. ( 2007). A comparison of WAIS-R and WAIS-III in lower IQ range: Implications for learning disability diagnosis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 323-330.
18.
Georgas, J., Weiss, L. G., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.). ( 2003). Culture and children’s intelligence: Cross-cultural analysis of the WISC-III. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
Glutting, J.J., Watkins, M.W., Konold, T.R., & McDermott, P.A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference: The utility of observed versus latent factors from the WISC-IV in estimating reading and math achievement on the WIAT-I. Journal of Special Education, 40, 103-114.
20.
Hancock, G.R. ( 2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and MIMIC approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika , 66, 373-388.
21.
Horn, J.L., & McArdle, J.J. ( 1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144.
Oh, H., Glutting, J.J., Watkins, M.W., Youngstrom, E.A., & McDermott, P.A. (2004). Correct interpretation of latent versus observed abilities: Implications from structural equation modeling applied to the WISC-III and WIAT linking sample. Journal of Special Education, 38, 159-173.
28.
Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. ( 1988). Some theory and applications for confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 23, 51-67.
29.
Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. ( 2000). A review and synthesis of the measurements invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-69.
30.
Widaman, K.F., & Reise, S.P. ( 1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance abuse domain. In K. J. Bryant & M. Windle (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advance from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281-324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
31.
Wechsler, D. ( 1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
32.
Wechsler, D. ( 1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
33.
Wechsler, D. ( 2003). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV) (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
34.
Wechsler, D. ( 2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
