Evaluating the Brief Resilience Scale in 21 Countries: Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance Across Sex,Age,and Countries

Abstract

The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) is widely used for assessing resilience. However, evaluations of the BRS’s measurement invariance across different countries are scarce. This study examines the psychometric properties of the BRS across 21 countries, using a sample of 10,259 participants from the COVIDiSTRESS II Global Survey dataset. It investigates the reliability, factor structure, criterion validity, and measurement invariance across age, sex, and countries. The results indicate that the BRS has high reliability, and the two-factor structure is the most widely applicable optimal structure. Full measurement invariance across sex was achieved, while partial measurement invariance across age was established. With respect to geographical heterogeneities, the Central American subgroup achieved full measurement invariance while partial measurement invariance was observed in the South American subgroup. Regarding cultural differences, partial measurement invariance was obtained in the Latin American subgroup. However, the full country group and the other country subgroups did not achieve measurement invariance. The significant correlations between the BRS and factors like stressors, perceived stress, loneliness, social support, and emotion regulation support its criterion validity. These findings suggest that the BRS is a valuable psychometric tool for resilience research. However, caution is needed when applying it across different age groups and countries.

Keywords

resilience the brief resilience scale psychometric evaluation measurement invariance cross-cultural study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alıcı

Y. H.

Hasanli

Saygılı

Koçak

O. M.

(2023). The importance of mentalization, coping mechanisms, and perceived stress in the prediction of resilience of healthcare workers. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 28(9), 2635–2646. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13548506.2022.2131855

Amat

Subhan

Jaafar

W. M. W.

Mahmud

Johari

K. S. K.

(2014). Evaluation and psychometric status of the brief resilience scale in a sample of Malaysian International students. Asian Social Science, 10(18), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n18p240

Balzarotti

(2021). The emotion regulation questionnaire: Factor structure and measurement invariance in an Italian sample of community dwelling adults. Current Psychology, 40(10), 4918–4929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00426-3

Betancourt

T. S.

Khan

K. T.

(2008). The mental health of children affected by armed conflict: Protective processes and pathways to resilience. International Review of Psychiatry, 20(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260802090363

Blackburn

A. M.

Vestergren

, & the COVIDiSTRESS II Consortium. (2022). COVIDiSTRESS diverse dataset on psychological and behavioural outcomes one year into the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Data, 9(1), 331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01383-6

Boardman

Griffiths

Kokanovic

Potiriadis

Dowrick

Gunn

(2011). Resilience as a response to the stigma of depression: A mixed methods analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 135(1), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.08.007

Bonanno

G. A.

(2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20

Bonanno

G. A.

Mancini

A. D.

(2011). Toward a lifespan approach to resilience and potential trauma. In Litz

B. T.

Charney

Friedman

M. J.

Southwick

S. M.

(Eds.), Resilience and mental health: Challenges across the lifespan (pp. 120–134). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511994791.010

Bonanno

G. A.

Westphal

Mancini

A. D.

(2011). Resilience to loss and potential trauma. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 511–535. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104526

10.

Broll

Schäfer

S. K.

Chmitorz

Meule

Voderholzer

Helmreich

Lieb

(2024). Psychometric properties of the German version of the brief resilience scale in persons with mental disorders. BMC Psychiatry, 24(1), 631. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06062-x

11.

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

12.

Chmitorz

Wenzel

Stieglitz

R.-D.

Kunzler

Bagusat

Helmreich

Gerlicher

Kampa

Kubiak

Kalisch

Lieb

Tüscher

(2018). Population-based validation of a German version of the Brief Resilience Scale. PLoS One, 13(2), e0192761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192761

13.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

14.

Cohen

Kamarck

Mermelstein

(1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404

15.

Connor

K. M.

Davidson

J. R. T.

(2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113

16.

da Silva-Sauer

de la Torre-Luque

Smith

B. W.

Lins

M. C. M. C.

Andrade

Fernández-Calvo

. (2021). Brief resilience scale (BRS) Portuguese version: Validity and metrics for the older adult population. Aging & Mental Health, 25(8), 1554–1563. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13607863.2020.1753015

17.

de Holanda Coelho

G. L.

Hanel

P. H. P.

Cavalcanti

T. M.

Rezende

A. T.

Gouveia

V. V

. (2016). Brief resilience scale: Testing its factorial structure and invariance in Brazil. Universitas Psychologica, 15(2), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-2.brst

18.

DeVellis

R. F.

Thorpe

C. T.

(2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. SAGE Publications.

19.

Edward

Welch

Chater

(2009). The phenomenon of resilience as described by adults who have experienced mental illness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(3), 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04912.x

20.

Falk

C. F.

Muthukrishna

(2023). Parsimony in model selection: Tools for assessing fit propensity. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000422

21.

Fergus

Zimmerman

M. A.

(2005). Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357

22.

Fletcher

Sarkar

(2013). Psychological resilience. European Psychologist, 18(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000124

23.

Fung

(2020). Validity of the brief resilience scale and brief resilient coping scale in a Chinese sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041265

24.

Hiebel

Rabe

Maus

Peusquens

Radbruch

Geiser

(2021). Resilience in adult health science revisited—A narrative review synthesis of process-oriented approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659395

25.

Hughes

M. E.

Waite

L. J.

Hawkley

L. C.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574

26.

Huntington

S. P.

(1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.

27.

Jacobs

Horsch

(2019). Psychometric properties of the French brief resilience scale. European Journal of Health Psychology, 26(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1027/2512-8442/a000022

28.

Kalisch

Müller

M. B.

Tüscher

(2015). A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400082X

29.

Kaniasty

Norris

F. H.

(1995). In search of altruistic community: Patterns of social support mobilization following Hurricane Hugo. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(4), 447–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506964

30.

Karadaş

Duran

(2022). The effect of social support on work stress in health workers during the pandemic: The mediation role of resilience. Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3), 1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22742

31.

Kirmayer

L. J.

Sehdev

Whitley

Dandeneau

S. F.

Isaac

(2009). Community resilience: Models, metaphors and measures. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 5(1), Article 1. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/ijih/article/view/28978

32.

Konaszewski

Niesiobędzka

Surzykiewicz

(2020). Validation of the polish version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). PLoS One, 15(8), e0237038. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237038

33.

Kyriazos

T. A.

Stalikas

Prassa

Galanakis

Yotsidi

Lakioti

(2018). Psychometric evidence of the brief resilience scale (BRS) and modeling distinctiveness of resilience from depression and stress. Psychology, 9(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.97107

34.

Leys

Kotsou

Shankland

Firmin

Péneau

Fossion

(2021). Resilience predicts lower anxiety and depression and greater recovery after a vicarious trauma. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312608

35.

Lock

Rubin

G. J.

Murray

Rogers

M. B.

Amlôt

Williams

(2012). Secondary stressors and extreme events and disasters: A systematic review of primary research from 2010–2011. PLoS Currents, 4, ecurrents.dis.a9b76fed1b2dd5c5bfcfc13c87a2f24f. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.a9b76fed1b2dd5c5bfcfc13c87a2f24f

36.

Luong

Flake

J. K.

(2023). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000441

37.

Mak

W. W. S.

I. S. W.

Wong

C. C. Y.

(2011). Resilience: Enhancing well-being through the positive cognitive triad. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(4), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025195

38.

Martins Barroso

. (2021). Evidences of validity of the Brief Resilience Scale for Brazil. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 53, 172–179. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2021.v53.19

39.

Mehta

C. M.

Arnett

J. J.

Palmer

C. G.

Nelson

L. J.

(2020). Established adulthood: A new conception of ages 30 to 45. The American Psychologist, 75(4), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000600

40.

Yang

Mezo

P. G.

Liu

(2022). Age disparities in mental health during the COVID19 pandemic: The roles of resilience and coping. Social Science & Medicine, 305, 115031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115031

41.

Ntontis

Blackburn

A. M.

Han

Stöckli

Milfont

T. L.

Tuominen

Griffin

S. M.

Ikizer

Jeftic

Chrona

Nasheedha

Liutsko

Vestergren

(2023). The effects of secondary stressors, social identity, and social support on perceived stress and resilience: Findings from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 88, 102007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102007

42.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

43.

Panter-Brick

(2015). Culture and resilience: Next steps for theory and practice. In Theron

L. C.

Liebenberg

Ungar

(Eds.), Youth resilience and culture: Commonalities and complexities (pp. 233–244). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9415-2_17

44.

Pineda

C. N.

Ortiz

Ouano

E. L.

Padua

N. P.

Paronable

Pelayo

J. M.

Regalado

M. C.

Torres

G. C. S.

(2022). Resilience, social support, loneliness and quality of life during COVID-19 pandemic: A structural equation model. Nurse Education in Practice, 64, 103419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103419

45.

Preston

C. C.

Colman

A. M.

(2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5

46.

Reifman

Niehuis

(2023). Extending the five psychological features of emerging adulthood into established adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 30(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-022-09412-9

47.

Rodríguez-Rey

Alonso-Tapia

Hernansaiz-Garrido

(2016). Reliability and validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Spanish Version. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), e101–e110. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000191

48.

Ruisoto

López-Guerra

V. M.

Paladines

M. B.

Vaca

S. L.

Cacho

(2020). Psychometric properties of the three versions of the Perceived Stress Scale in Ecuador. Physiology & Behavior, 224, 113045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113045

49.

Rutkowski

Svetina

(2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413498257

50.

Sánchez

Estrada-Hernández

Booth

Pan

(2021). Factor structure, internal reliability, and construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): A study on persons with serious mental illness living in the community. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 94(3), 620–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12336

51.

Sapienza

J. K.

Masten

A. S.

(2011). Understanding and promoting resilience in children and youth. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 24(4), 267. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32834776a8

52.

Saris

W. E.

Satorra

Sorbom

(1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 17, 105. https://doi.org/10.2307/271030

53.

Schermelleh-Engel

Moosbrugger

Müller

(2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/∼snijders/mpr_Schermelleh.pdf

54.

Shrivastava

Desousa

(2016). Resilience: A psychobiological construct for psychiatric disorders. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 58(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.174365

55.

Simms

L. J.

Zelazny

Williams

T. F.

Bernstein

(2019). Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000648

56.

Smith

B. W.

Dalen

Wiggins

Tooley

Christopher

Bernard

(2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972

57.

Smith

B. W.

Tooley

E. M.

Christopher

P. J.

Kay

V. S.

(2010). Resilience as the ability to bounce back from stress: A neglected personal resource? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(3), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.482186

58.

Sun

Stewart

(2007). Development of population-based resilience measures in the primary school setting. Health Education, 107(6), 575–599.

59.

Steenkamp

J.-B. E. M.

Baumgartner

(1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528

60.

Theron

L. C.

Liebenberg

Ungar

(Eds.). (2015). Youth resilience and culture: Commonalities and complexities (Vol. 11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9415-2

61.

Thomas

Zolkoski

(2020). Preventing stress among undergraduate learners: The importance of emotional intelligence, resilience, and emotion regulation. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00094

62.

Troy

A. S.

Willroth

E. C.

Shallcross

A. J.

Giuliani

N. R.

Gross

J. J.

Mauss

I. B.

(2023). Psychological resilience: An affect-regulation framework. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 547–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020122-041854

63.

Ungar

(2008). Resilience across Cultures. The British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl343

64.

Ungar

(2011). The social ecology of resilience: Addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01067.x

65.

Ungar

(2013). Resilience, trauma, context, and culture. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838013487805

66.

United Nations (Ed.). (1999). Standard country or area codes for statistical use: Current information as at 31 august 1999. United Nations Publ.

67.

Vandenberg

R. J.

Lance

C. E.

(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002

68.

Vernon

Gage

D. D.

(2016). Late adulthood: Emotional and social development. In Capuzzi

Stauffer

M. D.

(Eds.), Human growth and development across the lifespan (pp. 543–572). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394258925.ch18

69.

Wagnild

G. M.

Young

H. M.

(1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1(2), 165–178.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB